The Hermeneutic Method in Modern Domestic Jurisprudence

Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov


This scientific article deals with the problem of the use of the hermeneutic method of obtaining knowledge of legal phenomena. The purpose of the article is to show the potential of the hermeneutic method in the field of law.  In the furtherance of this goal, the following objectives were set: 1) to justify the significance of the methodological basis of jurisprudence; 2) to consider the concept of hermeneutics in the historical aspect (views of Aristotle, Wilhelm Diltey, Friedrich Schleiermacher, Friedrich Nietzsche, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Max Weber and others); 3) to analyze the views of domestic scientists who justifying the necessity of using of the hermeneutic method by the study of legal phenomena (Djangir Abbasovich Kerimov, Mikhail Mikhailovich Rassolov, Petr Moiseyevich Rabinovich, Vitaly Andreevich Suslov, Ilya Lvovich Chestnov); 4) to show weak points of the hermeneutic method in jurisprudence, arguments of opponents of this approach (Vladimir Mikhailovich Syryh, Igor Yurevich Kozlikhin, Vyacheslav Nikolayevich Zhukov and others). The result of the conducted research were the following provisions: 1) without denying some fruitfulness of the metaphysics which is the basis of the analyzed method, we notice that the hermeneutics method is not applied practically in the law because there is no the corresponding technique and it is replaced with a historical method of interpretation of legal norms. In conclusion, it should be stressed that even those scientists who placed certain research hopes on the legal hermeneutics have now begun to doubt its potential, believing that this approach of the study of the law as an independent one has not yet taken place.


Methodology; legal phenomena; hermeneutics method; dialogue character; interpretation; historical method of interpretation; metaphysics

Full Text:



Atarshchikova, E., N. (1998). Hermeneutica in law: history and modernity. SPb: SPB University the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation.

Aristotle. (2019). On Interpretation. // (date of appeal: June 24)

Cherdantsev, A., F. (2003). Interpretation of Soviet law. M.:YUNITI-DANA.

Chestnov, I., L. (2002). Legal understanding in the post-modern era: monograph. SPb.: St. Petersburg Institute of Foreign Economic Relations, Economics and Law.

Dal, V. (1978). The interpreted dictionary of the living Great Russian language in 4 volumes. T.1. Moscow: Russian language.

Demidov, A., I. (2001). On methodological situation in law. Law.

Diltey, W. (2019) Hermeneutics. sources//Wilhelm Diltej's Hermeneutics. Fundamentals of hermeneutics.// ›731690/filosofiya...dilteya (date of appeal: June 24)

Ellinek, G. (1908). General teaching of the state. SPb: N.K. Martynov.

Freud. (2019). The situation of Freud hermeneutics. // (date of appeal: June 24).

Gadamer, H., G. Truth and method. T.1. Hermeneutics. Foundations of philosophical hermeneutics. M.: Progress.

Gizo, F. (1905). History of civilization in Europe. SPb: Published by Pavlenkova.

Golovistikova, A., N. (2008). Method of Science of Theory of State and Law. Theory of State and Law: textbook//under ed. Albert Semisovich Pigolkin, Yuri Albertovich Dmitriev. M.: Higher Education.

Ivanovich, K., A. (2012). Historiosophy of State and Law: monograph. M.: Jurlitinform,

Kerimov, D., B. (2004). Theory of State and Law as Science. Theory of State and Law: textbook. //under the ed. Michail Michailovich Rassolov. M.: UNITA-Dana. Law and Law.

Kozhevnikov, V., V. (2008). Methodology and history of law: learning guide in 2 parts. Ch.1.Omsk: Omsk Dostoevsky State University.

Kozlikhin, I., Y. (2006). On unconventional approaches to law//Law.

Kozhevnikov, V., V. (2017). Interpretation of law//Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich, Kozhenevsky Victor Boleslavovich, Rybakov V.A. Theory of state and law: textbook //executive ed. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. M.: Avenue.

Kuznetsov. V., G. (1992). Hermeneuve and methodology of humanitarian knowledge//dis. Doctor of Philosophical Sciences. M: Lomonosov Moscow State University Surilov, A., V. (1989). Theory of State and Law: a learning guide. Kiev-Odessa: The highest school.

Lyubashitz, V., Y., Mordovtsev A., Y., and Mamychev A., Y. (2010). Theory of State and Law: textbook. Rostov: Phenix.

Martyshin, O., V. (2004). Introductory Article. History of Political and Legal Teachings: textbook//under ed. Oresta Vladimirovich Martyshin. M.: Norm,

Nersesyantz, V., S. (2005). Subject and method of history of political and legal teachings. History of political and legal teachings: training course. Under ed. Vladik Sumbatovich Nersesyants. M.: Norma.

Nietzsche, F. (2019). Will to the power. Experience of the revaluation of all values// (date of appeal: June 24).

Ovchinnikov, A., I. (2007). Legal thinking in the hermeneutic paradigm: monograph. Rostov: Rostov City Office.

Pigolkin, A., S, and Dmitriev, Y., A. (2008). Higher Education. M.: Higher education, Theory of State and Law: a textbook// under ed.

Polyakov, A., V. (2004). General theory of law: problems of interpretation in the context of communicative approach: course of lectures. SPb: publish. House of St. Petersburg State University.

Protasov, V., N, and Protasova N., V. (2010). Lectures on general theory of law and theory of the state. M.: Published. The Dom "Gorodez".

Rabinovich, P., M. (2005). Philosophy of Law: Problems and Approaches: Tutorial//executive ed.. Lvov: Ivan Franco lvov National University.

Rassolov, M., M, Malakhov V., P, Ivanov A., A. (2010). Current problems of state theory and law: a tutorial. UNITY-DANA, Legal and Law.

Rassolov, M., M. (2007). Problems of state theory and law: a tutorial. M.: UNITA-Dana, Law and Law.

Riker, P. (1995). Conflict of Interpretation. Essays on hermeneutics. M.: Medium.

Rusanov, V., V. (2016). Unconventional Methods in Legal Science of the 20th Century. History and Methodology of Legal Science: textbook. Under the ed. Vitaliya Victorovich Sorokina. Barnaul: Noviy Format,

Schleiermacher, F., H. (2004). SPb: European House.

Suslov V., A. (2001). Hermeneutica law.

Suslov, V., A. (1997). Hermeneutic aspect of legislative interpretation//Jurisprudence

Soviet encyclopedia dictionary. (1982). M.: Soviet Encyclopedia.

Smirnov, A., V. (2008). Manukyan Artem Heinrikovich. Interpretation of the norms of Law: Educational and Practical Manual. M.: Prospect.

Syryh, V., M. (2007). Hermeneutic Circle as a methodological impasse. Modern methods of research in law//under the ed. Nikolai Ignanievich Matuzov, Alexander Vasilevich Malko. Saratov.

Syryh, V., M. (2004). Logical bases of general theory of law in 2 volumes. T.1. Elemental composition. M.: Yusticinform,

Vlasenko, N., A. (2019). Methodological Problems of Modern Law Theory. Journal of Russian Law.

Zhukov, V., N. (2019). Philosophy of Law: textbook. M.: World of Philosophy. Algorithm.

Zotov, A., F., Mironov V., V., Razin A., V. (2004) Philosophy. M.: Academic project; Triksa.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 88 times
PDF - 70 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.