Beginner Voter Perception of Presidential Candidates (Case Study of the Presidential Election in 2019)

The Constitutional Court granted part of the judicial review Law No. 42 of 2008, namely Article 3 paragraph (5), Article 12 paragraph (1) and (2), Article 14 paragraph (2), and Article 112, but the Constitutional Court does not grant the judicial review of Article 9. Article 9 of Law No. 42 of 2008 states "Candidate pairs are proposednby political parties orna combination of politicalnparties participating innelections that meetnthe requirements fornobtaining seats at leastn20% (twenty percent) of thennumber of seats in the DPR ornobtain 25% (twenty five percent) of nationalnlegitimate votes in electionnof DPR members, before the electionnof the President andNVicenPresident". This is thenncalled the votenacquisition thresholdnfor political parties or a combinationmof political parties in carryingnout candidates for President andnVice President, or better known as thenpresidential threshold. The issuancenof the decision of the ConstitutionalnCourt No. 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 raises thenconsequences of the simultaneousnimplementation of the LegislativenElection and the Presidentnand Vice President. 2019 is a politicalnyear because this year willnbe held the largestnand simultaneousndemocratic party in Indonesia.nElection of membersnof Regency / City DPRD, ProvincialmDPRD, DPRmRI, DPDnRI and of coursenthe election of the President and DeputynPresident of Indonesia heldnsimultaneously on 17mApriln2019. Election designnsimultaneously in mostnother countries asnstated by Abstract


I. Introduction
The Constitutional Court granted part of the judicial review Law No. 42 of 2008, namely Article 3 paragraph (5), Article 12 paragraph (1) and (2), Article 14 paragraph (2), and Article 112, but the Constitutional Court does not grant the judicial review of Article 9. Article 9 of Law No. 42 of 2008 states "Candidate pairs are proposednby political parties orna combination of politicalnparties participating innelections that meetnthe requirements fornobtaining seats at leastn20% (twenty percent) of thennumber of seats in the DPR ornobtain 25% (twenty five percent) of nationalnlegitimate votes in electionnof DPR members, before the electionnof the President andNVicenPresident". This is thenncalled the votenacquisition thresholdnfor political parties or a combinationmof political parties in carryingnout candidates for President andnVice President, or better known as thenpresidential threshold.
The issuancenof the decision of the ConstitutionalnCourt No. 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 raises thenconsequences of the simultaneousnimplementation of the LegislativenElection and the Presidentnand Vice President. 2019 is a politicalnyear because this year willnbe held the largestnand simultaneousndemocratic party in Indonesia.nElection of membersnof Regency / City DPRD, ProvincialmDPRD, DPRmRI, DPDnRI and of coursenthe election of the President and DeputynPresident of Indonesia heldnsimultaneously on 17mApriln2019. Election designnsimultaneously in mostnother countries asnstated by Jones andnmany other researchersnin Latin America (Wijayanti & Purwaningsih,n2015) statesnthat the legislativenand executive electoral systems in multipartynpresidentialnsystems mustncombine simultaneous implementationmtimes, proportional systemsnin legislative elections,mand plurality systemsnin determining the winnersnof their presidentialnelections. The plurality systemnitself tends to producenfewer presidentialncandidates.
The firstncandidate figure wasn01 JokonWidodo, born in June 21, 1961, a candidate, a politicalncareer began as Solo 2005 mayornwho wasnpaired with FX HadinRudyatmo, then in 2010 re-nominated for thensecond time as mayor of Solo. However, in the secondnperiod JokonWidodo only lasted two yearsnbecause he became ancandidate for the Governor of DKI Jakartanin 2012 in pairs with BasukinTjahaja Purnama.Onlynserving as governor ofnDKI Jakarta in less than twonyears, in 2014 JokonWidodo advanced as a Presidentialncandidate in pairs with JusufnKalla. In 2019 JokonWidodo moved back as andefense paired withnMar'uf Amin.
Second candidate figure 02 PrabowonSubianto was born on October 21, 1951. The political traces innIndonesia began as one of the founders of PartanGerindra or the Great IndonesianMovement Party which was established onnFebruary 6, 2008. Gerindramparty was one of JokonWidodo's supporters -Basuki TjahajaNPurnama when advancing as candidate for Governor -Deputy Governor ofmDKInJakarta in 2012.
This paper aims to review between the two presidential figures in the 2019 election. Moreover, two presidential figures who fought over the votes of the Indonesian people were the same figures during the 2014 election. This paper discusses perceptionsnnewbie voter, how retired retainers in this case is part of the community to see and assess the two presidential figures according to their respective perceptions. This is what attracts the attention of researchers to examine the perceptions of newbie voter in SMAN 5 Surakartanon the two figures of the president in then2019 election. The ideologynof each President figurenand the bearer party and other thingsnwill influence perceptions, whichnwill be examined in thisnstudy.

II. Research Methods
This research was conducted at SMAN 5 Surakarta and the study was conducted in 2019. The samples used in this study were 56 beginner voters in SMAN 5 Surakarta. The research method used was quantitative research with a descriptive approach. According to Sugiyono (2012) "Research methods based on the philosophy of positivism, are used to examine a particular population or sample, data collection using research instruments, quantitative / statistical data analysis, with the aim to test the hypothesis that has been set". According to Sugiyono (2012) descriptive research that is, research conducted to determine the value of an independent variable, either one variable or more (independent) without making comparisons, or connecting with other variables.
Based on this theory, quantitative descriptive research, is data obtained from a sample of the study population analyzed according to the statistical methods used. Descriptive research in this study is intended to get the perception of novice voters towards presidential candidates in the 2019 general election. The reason why choosing novice voters is because first-time voters use their voting rights for the first time and have different characteristics and characters, backgrounds, experiences and challenges with voters in the previous generation. For example, novice voters use social media, from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and so on.
The perception in this study is thenperception of presidential candidates, basednon that, the same main element is used by thenAlvara Research Centern(ARC) survey institution, which is based on image attributes,nwhich are divided into 4 categories, namelyn (Hassanudin, 2014): 1. Vertical Leaders,nThis candidate has an image with the characteristics of leaders who are assertive, authoritative,nand lead. 2. Horizontal Leaders,nthis candidate is known and perceived by the public as frank, honest and freenof corruption. 3. Legacy Leaders,nThis candidate is a longtime player because it has been knownnby the public and alsonperceived by the nationalist public. 4. Change-Drivers Leaders,nThis candidate is considered to represent a young figure and is alsonperceived to be capablenof bringing aboutnchange. Brennan andnLomasky (1977) andnFlorina (1981 state that thendecision to vote during an election is "expressive" behavior.nThis behavior is not much different from thenbehavior of supportersnwho provide support to the footballnteam. According to them,nvoting behavior is stronglyninfluenced by loyaltynand ideology. Lukman Hakim (2009), that the media has a very strong influence on the formation of one's cognition. The media provides information and knowledge which in turn can shape perception. And perception influences a person's attitude and behavior. Various media reports provide input to individual cognition, and cognition will shape attitudes.
There are variousnissuesnas a consideration fornsomeonenmaking a choice. There are issues related tonimproving people's welfare, unemployment, race, gender,nreligion, andnso on. A voternisnusually not the same response to thesenissues, so the influencenof eachnissue on voting behaviornisnalso not the same. Seen by a number ofncontestants, both political parties or individualncandidates,noften position them selves and raise the politicalnissue to the fullest extent (Downs,n1957;Franklin 1991;nGlazer, 1990 Evans andnOver (1996, 1997 distinguish two concepts of rationality. First, rationality is interpreted as thinking, talking,nsharing, making decisions and acting to achieve goals efficiently and effectively (personalnreasons for personnel sales). Second, rationality is defined as thinking,ntalking, arguing, taking decisions and acting based on a certain normative system (emphasizing the degree of equality of individual decisions withnthe truth ofnsociety).
Ideology is not something standard.nUsing Giddens's structurationntheory (1984) and dialectic theory of actionnfrom Sewell (1988), ideology isnconsidered as a major factor for voters in determining choices.nBreen (1999) shows that value systems cannchange in the course and experience of humannlife. There is andialectic between voter ideology and partynideology or contestant ideology. Scotto (2004) that the role of ideology in influencing voters is verynimportant. During an election campaign, a political partynor a contestant who uses a mass mobilization strategy usually optimizes ideological closeness with its participantsn (Rohrschneider, 2002). This will have two effects ofncommunication on the ideological identitynof parties and contestants, (1) strengthening thenidentity of the masses through symbolicnpolitical rituals such as grand meetings, and (2) extending ideological identity to the floating masses andnpartisans of parties and otherncontestants.
In determining candidates, each voter also has characteristics that influence his choice as expressed by Cletusnin Charaka (2018), namely as follows: 1. Socio-economic status,nincludingnthe level of education, income, and occupation. 2. Demographics, includingnage and gender. 3. Politicalnefficacy, including political interest and political trust. 4. Social connectedness, including marital status, home ownership,nattendance at places of worship andnorganizational membership. Azhar (2018) states that political information that is often debated concerns two things, namely related to political parties and elites who become candidates in a political contestation. Political participation is the involvement of self, mental, thoughts and emotions or feelings of a person from various levels of political activity such as election activities of state leaders through elections as a form of awareness and responsibility of a person against government regulations or policies (Amrizal, 2018). While according to Budiarjo in Matondang (2018) Political participation is the activity of a group of people to actively participate in political life, among others by choosing a state leader, directly or indirectly, influencing government action (public policy), this includes actions such as voting in general elections, attending public meetings, holding relations (contacting) or lobbying with government officials or members of parliament, becoming members of the party or one of the social movements with direct action and so on.
The researcher wanted tonexamine the perceptions of newbie voter as a voter. How to see the two candidates for Presidentnin the 2019 election. Any factors that shape the perception of the twoncandidate figures include the vision and mission that each stretcher for the next five years. Firmanzah (2012)nThus it will be able to mapnwhat kind of voter typology, there are four types of voter typologies namely rational, critical,nskeptical and traditional. Maps the typology ofnvoters into four types as follows:

RationalnVoters
This type ofnvoter has a characteristic that is not so concernednwith ideology to a party or ancontestant. Factors such as understanding, origins, traditionalnvalues, culture, religion, and psychographicsnare indeed considered too, but not a significant thing. The most important thing for this typenof voter is what can be (and hasnbeen) done by a party or ancandidate, rather thannthe understanding andnvalue of the party or contestant.

CriticalnVoter
This typenof voter is a combination of the high orientation on thenability of politicalnparties or a contestant in resolvingnthe nation's problems andntheir high orientation towardsnideologicalnmatters.nThe importance ofnideological tiesnmakes voter loyalty to anpoliticalnparty or a contestant high enough and not as easy as 'rational voter' to turn to another party. This type of voter is a critical voter, meaning that they will always analyze the link between the party's value system (ideology) and the policynthat will be made. This type of voter must be managednas well as possible by a political party or ancontestant, voters have the desire and ability to continue to improve party performance, while the possibility of disappointment that can end in frustration and the making of rival political parties is also great.

Traditionalnvoters
Voters in this type have a very high ideologicalnorientation and do not really see political party policies or a contestant as important in decision making.nTraditional votersnstrongly prioritizensocio-cultural closeness, origin, understanding,nand religion as a measure to choose a political party.nUsually this type of voter prefers the leader figure and personality, myth and historical value of a political party or a contestant. One of the fundamental characteristics of this type of voter is a low level of education and conservatives in holding thenvalues and ideology adopted. Traditional voters are a type of voter who can be mobilized during the campaign period, high loyalty is one of the most visible characteristics for this type of voter.

SkepticalnVoter
Skeptical voters are voters who do not have a high ideological orientation with a political party or a contestant, as well asnsomething important. The desire to be involved in a political party in thisntype of voters is very lacking, because their ideological ties are indeednvery low.nTheynalso ignored the work program or 'platform' and the policies of a political party. In certain aspects, this type of voter emphasizes pragmatism more, for example because of money politics. Money politics as a form of political pragmatism is not always in the sense of givingna number of money to voters, but it can be in rather softnforms so that it is not suggested ton"buy" votes such as basicnfood assistance, building mosques and so on. Anwar Arifin (2006) states that some studies show thentendency of votersnin general elections to drop their choice of political heroes,nnamely candidates who fit the image of the ideal position for him.nThe ideal image of the position in question is politicians who have maturity, honesty, courage and so on. That is the nature of political heroism.nThus political heroes have theirnown attraction, in the process of political communicationnto influence audiences, especially prospective voters. Anpolitical figure who is called a political hero is basically a formal and informal leader, who gets public or public trust.
The study from Benedictanand Anita (2018) illustrates that the level of respondents' interest in candidates for the President of the Republicnof Indonesia is high, so respondents expect that the candidates of the Republic ofnIndonesia must be assertive, authoritative, have leadership, populist, honest, free of corruption, publicly known (public), nationalist soul, able to represent young figuresnand able to bring change.
Based on the research ofnBenedicta and Anita (2018), the results obtained above, PresidentnPrabowo's figure is more prominent in the attributes of being assertive, authoritative and having a leadership spirit, while PresidentnJokowi's figure stands out on the attributes of people, honesty, free of corruption,nknown by the public, nationalist spirit, representing figures youngnand able to bring change.
Meanwhile, Chappel andnVeiga (2000) stated that the economic performance and political responsibility of contestants simultaneously influence the final results of elections. Economic issues are the center of attention because they are closely related to welfare.nVoters tend to choosencontestants who offer the most attractive solutions to solveneconomic problems such as unemployment, inflation, investmentnand taxes.

IV. Conclusion
The first elections in 2019 were held simultaneously in Indonesia, the Indonesian people electing members of the DPR, DPD, Provincial DPRD, Regency / City DPRD as well as the President and Vice President. For Incumbent, the figure of JokonWidodo in the 2019 election took Ma'rufnAmin as a Vice-Presidential candidate. Then Figure PrabowonSubianto took SandiaganUno. The fight in fighting over the position of President for office in 2019-2024. This research focuses on assessing the perception of the researcher wanted tonexamine the perceptions of newbie voter in SMANn5 Surakarta. There are several things that can influence the perception of the President's figure, namely leadership, anti-corruption, welfare, nationalism and changes for the better state of Indonesia. No less important is the figure of the President can be close to all levels of the people so that it is expected to know what the people want for the future, especially providing a concrete solution such as the problem of welfare, unemployment, politics and investment for business people as well as the ideology carried by each of the President's figures. So from these things can be assessed through the vision and mission carried. With this research, it can be judged to include what kind of voter configuration, whether voters are rational, critical, skeptical and traditional. The description is the things that affect the perception of voters in determining their choice in the 2019 election. Novice voters in SMAN 5 Surakarta are in the category of critical voters because with knowledge of social media and issues in the media are able to judge whether the prospective leader is eligible to be elected in the general election.