Evaluation of PJOK Learning In Sman I Karangan Trenggalek

Via Diah Rohmana, I Made Sriundy Mahardika, Abdul Rachman Syam Tuasikal


The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of physical education, sport, and health (PJOK) learning in SMAN I Karangan Trenggalek using the CIPP model (context, input, process, product) developed by Stufflebeam. Evaluation research uses a mix analysis method. Sources of research data are Physical Education Teachers, representatives of the curriculum, as well as Principals who are in SMA Negeri 1 Karangan Trenggalek. Primary data collection uses observation instruments while secondary data is obtained through documentation and interviews. Data obtained from observations were then analyzed quantitatively while data from documentation and interviews were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. From the results of research conducted showed that the implementation of PJOK learning programs in SMAN I Karangan Trenggalek included in the very good category.


Evaluation model; physical education, sport, and health (PJOK).

Full Text:



Azmi, C, and Sunarno, A. (2017). Intensive Training Program Evaluation of the Indonesian National Sports Committee of North Sumatera. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 06(04): 33-36.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design (Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran) Edisi 4. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Firharmawan, H. (2015). CIPP-Based Evaluation on English for Sport Science at Sport Education Study Program of the The University of Ma’Arif Nahdlatul Ulama (Umnu) Kebumen. Journal of Higher Education and Outreach Engagement. 06(01): 40-58

Hakan, K. and Seval, F. (2011). CIPP Evaluation Model Scale; Devolopment, Reability, and Validity. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science. 00(2011)1-8. www.sciencederect.com

Jamaludin, Awal Akbar. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan jasmani, Kesehatan, dan Olahraga di SMP Negeri 3 Malang Menggunakan Model CIPP. Journal of Physical Education, Sport and Recreation. 02(01). 34-40.

Rousseau and Ronald (2012). Journal Evaluation Technical and Practical issues. Library Trends. 50(3), 418-439.

Stufflebeam and Crish (2015). Evaluation Theory, Models & Aplicationns. Journal of Mult Disciplinary Evaluation. Volume 11, Issue 25, p. 93-96.

Stufflebeam, D.L. and Coryn, C.L. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Fransisco. Jossey Bass

Surla, et.al. (2012). Rules for Evaluation of Scientific Result Publisherd Scientific Journal. Managemen Information System. Col. 7(3), p 3-10.

Tseng, K. et.al. (2010). Using CIPP Model to assess an Enginering Curikulum. Word Transaction on Enginering and Technology Education. 8.3, 2010.

Undang-Undang nomor 22 tahun 2016. Standart Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Permendiknas

Warju. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation Using CIPP Model. Jurnal UPI. 12(01): 36-42.

Widoyoko, Eko P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zhang, Q, et al. (2011). A Comprehensive Model for Evaluation of Sport Coaches’ Perfomance. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT). Volume 3, Issue 9, 265-271

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v2i4.672

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 106 times
PDF - 51 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.