Benefits and Challenges in Utilizing E-Portfolio among Ucas Students’ EFLClasses in Palestine

Dawood A. Al-Hidabi, Muhammad K. Kabilan, Mahmoud D. Shakfa


The widely spread usage of technology at tertiary level has stimulated professors and policymakers to search for new methods of assessment that fit the new digital generation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the benefits and challenges students get from utilizing e-portfolio in UCAS students' EFL classes. The total number of students in English Language social work classes under the humanitarian department at UCAS is 60 (30 males and 30 females). Those are officially enrolling in English Language course (DIPL 1303) at first semester of 2017/2018 academic year. A qualitative method was used to collect data for one semester. The results from the qualitative data indicated that students got four benefits from utilizing e-portfolio: Promoting feedback, improving ICT skills, enhancing quality of e-portfolio's content and holding responsibility as well as independence in the learning process. However, the students were reported to have faced some problems during implementation of e-portfolio such as: time factor, lack of efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing e-portfolio, lack of infrastructural facilities, and inability to speak English fluently. Therefore, it can be concluded that integrating e-portfolio at the tertiary level would facilitate the learning process and create a real change among the new digital generation. 


E-portfolio; benefits; challenges; UCAS & Palestine

Full Text:



Jalambo, M. O. A. (2012). Investigatiing english language target needs of social work students at the University College of Applied Sciences, Palestine. (Master Degree), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Al-Serhani, F. W. (2007). The effect of portfolio assessment on the writing performance of EFL secondary school students in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished MA thesis), Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Hirvela, A., & Sweetland, Y. L. (2005). Two case studies of L2 writers’ experiences across learning-directed portfolio contexts. Assessing Writing, 10(3), 192-213.

Klenowski, V. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles: Routledge.

Nunes, A. (2004). Portfolios in the EFL classroom: Disclosing an informed practice. ELT Journal, 58(4), 327-335.

Mourtaga, K. R. (2005). Investigating writing problems among Palestinian students studying English as a foreign language: THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI.

Sobeh, H. M. (2007). Evaluating English Writing Assessment in the 10th Grade at Gaza Schools with Regards to the Contemporary Trends.

El-Helou, H. A. R. (2010). Difficulties Facing English Teachers in Teaching Literature in English for Palestine Grade Twelve Textbook, (Master Degree Thesis), The Islamic University - Gaza

Ghoorchaei, B., Tavakoli, M., & Ansari, D. N. (2010). The impact of portfolio assessment on Iranian EFL students’ essay writing: A process-oriented approach. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 10(2), 35-51.

McDonough, S. H. (1983). Psychology in foreign language teaching. George Allen & Unwin:: London.

Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: New York: Prentice Hall.

Atta, M. A., & Jamil, A. (2012). Effects of motivation and parental influence on the educational attainments of students at secondary level. Academic Research International, 2, 427-431.

Hamp-Lyons, L., & Heasley, B. (2006). Study writing: A course in written English for academic purposes: Cambridge University Press.

Le, Q. (2012). E-Portfolio for enhancing graduate research supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 54-65.

Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2007). The use of portfolio to assess student's performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 75-90.

Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: supporting personal development and reflective learning: Routledge New York.

Erice, D., & Ertaş, A. (2011). The impact of e-portfolio on foreign language writing skills. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 44, 73-94.

Fakir, S. A. A. (2010). Assessment portfolios in an intensive English writing program: Opportunities and challenges. The university of memphis.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation: Cambridge university press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge: Harvard Business Press.

Schlager, M., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace, 129-158.

Kabilan, M. K., & Khan, M. A. (2012). Assessing Pre-service English Language Teachers’ Learning Using E-portfolios: Benefits, Challenges and Competencies Gained. Computers & Education.

Huang, J. J., Yang, S. J., Huang, Y.-M., & Hsiao, I. Y. (2010). Social Learning Networks: Build Mobile Learning Networks Based on Collaborative Services. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 78-92.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 2: Do they really think differently? On the horizon, 9(6), 1-6.

Kilbane, C. R., & Milman, N. B. (2003). The digital teaching portfolio handbook: A how-to guide for educators: Allyn & Bacon.

Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: New York: Prentice Hall.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.