The Effect of Jigsaw Methode and Motivation on Students’ of Learning Outcomes

Yunita Yunita, Hidayat Hidayat, Harun Sitompul

Abstract


This study aims to: (1) investigate the effect of Jigsaw cooperative learning on students learning outcomes; (2) find the difference in learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation and (3) find the interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes. The population of the study is students of grade IVa, IVb, IVc at SD Kasih Ibu Patumbak and the sample in this study is grade IVa with 35 students and grade IVb with 35 students. The results show that: (1) the average student learning outcomes of jigsaw cooperative learning is 28.40 while conventional is 24.14. Thus, students learning outcomes that get cooperative learning of jigsaw type are higher than conventional learning, (2) Students who have high motivation get an average value = 30.74, while low motivation is 22.72. Thus, it can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes having high learning motivation and low learning motivation, and (3) students learning outcomes  taught by jigsaw cooperative learning are high learning motivation groups (32.94), and low learning motivation groups (24.58), while students taught with conventional learning are high learning motivation groups (28.40 ), and low motivation groups (20,95). Thus, there is no interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes.


Keywords


jigsaw methode; motivation; learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gregory, Anne. 2004. Campaign Planning and Management. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2001. Teaching and Learning Process. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Huda, Miftahul, 2011, Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Ibrahim. Muslim. 2000. Cooperative Learning. Surabaya: University Press.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Johnson-Holubec, E.J. 2003.Cooperation in the Graderoom.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Purwanto. 2011. Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ruseffendi, E.T. 2001. Basics of Educational Research and Other Non-exact Fields. IKIP Semarang Press.

Sani.Abdullah. 2013. Learning Innovation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Sanjaya, Wina, 2008. Learning Process Oriented Standards for the Education Process. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.

Sardiman, 2011. Interaction & Motivation of teaching and learning, PT Raja GrafindoPersada, Jakarta.

Schunk, Dale. H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspectives, 6th Edition. New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Slameto 2003. Learning and Factors That Influence it. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Slavin, R. E. 2009. Cooperative learning. (Practice Research Theory). Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Assessment of Teaching and Learning Process Results, Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Supratiknya, A. 2012. Assessment of Learning Outcomes with Nontes. Yogyakarta: USD.

Uno, Hamzah. B. 2008. Motivation Theory and Measuremen. Jakarta: BumiAksara.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i1.749

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.