Environmental Literacy in Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru (A Naturalistic Inquiry Study at Adiwijaya School National Level)

Zaka Hadikusuma Ramadan, Elpri Darta Putra, Agus Baskara

Abstract


This research aims to; 1) describe the condition of the physical environment at Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru in the implementation of environmental literacy; 2) describe the implementation of Adiwiyata program at Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru in an effort to implement environmental literacy; 3) describe the learning at Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru in the effort to apply environmental literacy; and 4) describe the obstacles and solutions attempted by the schools at Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru in the implementation of environmental literacy. The method used in this study is naturalistic inquiry. The location of this study was conducted at Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru. Data collection techniques in this study are; 1) interview; 2) observation; and 3) documentation. Data analysis of the results of the study used Miles and Huberman model, namely, data reduction, data display, and drawing conclusion. The research results obtained that First, efforts to increase students' environmental literacy through the condition of the physical environment of Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru was dominated by the existence of Adiwiyata physical evidence. Second, efforts to increase environmental literacy of students in Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru through the Adiwiyata program are more dominated by the existence of Adiwiyata physical evidence and the application of an environment-based curriculum (monolithic curriculum for Environmental education subjects). Third, efforts to improve environmental literacy of students are made through learning, namely the selection of Basic Competencies in 2013 curriculum which has an environmental content and utilizes the school environment as a learning laboratory. Fourth, that is related to the obstacles encountered and the solutions pursued by Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru in an effort to increase environmental literacy of students. As for the obstacles including: accustoming students to love the environment, uniting the perspectives and goals of classroom action research, students, and parents, the solution pursued by Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru is to keep trying to accustom, give examples, give advices, provide guidance, and return to the written rules. The next obstacle is that there are still some teachers who sometimes give bad examples, the solution pursued by Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru is to inter-inspect each other related to activities in the school environment. The next obstacle is that some teachers are still trying to adjust to the implementation of 2013 curriculum, and the solution sought by Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru is to interact, learn and ask more experienced teachers.


Keywords


environmental literacy; elementary school 111 Pekanbaru

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, W. L. & Krathwohl. (2015). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Arsana, M., et al. (2013). Implementasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbantuan Media Lingkungan Sekitar Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Univeristas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Pendidikan Dasar (Volume 3 Thun 2013)

Atmodiwirjo, P. (2013). School Ground As Environmental Learning Resource: Teachers’ And Pupils’ Perspectives On Its Potentials, Uses And Accessibility. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education Vol. 3, Issue 2. Page 101-119

Aziz, F. (2014). Pengambilan Kebijakan Berbasis Education Management Information. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, Volume III, Nomor 1, Juni 2014, Hal 135-162

Bakry, A. (2010). Kebijakan Pendidikan Sebagai Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal MEDTEK, Volume 2, Nomor 1, April 2010.

Blessing, Igbokwe, A. (2012). Environmental Literacy Assessment: Exploring the Potential for the Assessment of Environmental Education/Programs in Ontario Schools. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2012. Page 648-656. Diakses 3 Juni 2015, 1:47 PM

Dahar, W. R. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga

Danis, P. (2013). New definition of environmental literacy and proposal for its international assessment in PISA 2015. Envigogika: Charles University E-journal for Environmental Education. Published 31. 12. 2013 DOI: Page 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.419

Duron, R. Et al. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework Any Disciplin. Internastional Joural of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Volume 17, Number 2, Page 160-166

Hosnan. 2014. Pendekatan saintifik dan Konekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia

Iqbal, M. M., et al. (2015). Gauging and Comparing Level of Environmental Literacy: A Case of Southern Punjab. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS) Vol. 35, No. 2 (2015), pp. 839-848.

Imelda, Anzelina, D. (2019). Students’ Activities in Learning with Problem Based Learning Based Module to Enhance Students’ HOTS on the Subject of Straight Line Equations. Budapest International Research in Linguistics and Education Sciences (BirLE) Journal, 2 (4), 552-559.

Jannah, M., et al. (2013). Impact of Environmental Education Kit on Students’ Environmental Literacy. Asian Social Science; Vol. 9, No. 12; 2013. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. Page 1-12

Kaliaman P. J., et al. (2014). Kajian Hukum Pengaruh Program Adiwiyata Terhadap Perlindungan dan Penglolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Sektor Pendidikan di Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Beraja Niti Volume 3 Nomor 8. Hal. 1-16

Kubiatko, M. (2014). The Environmetal Literay of lower Secondary School Pupils High School and College Students. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering Technology, 2014, 2, Page 2-8

Landriany, E. (2014). Implementasi Kebijakan Adiwiyata Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup di SMA Kota Malang. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Volume 2, Nomor 1, Januari 2014; 82-88.

Lestari, S. (2014). Pembelajaran Kontekstual Bermedia Objek Nyata pada Perkalian dan Pembagian untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol. 2, No. 4, Desember 2014, Hal 238-249

Lee, K. H. (2005). The Relationship Between Creative Thinking Ability and Creative Personality of Preschoolers. International Education Journal, 2005, 6 (2), Page 194-199.Shannon Research Press

Lickona, T. (2013). Mendidik untuk Membentuk Karakter: Bagaimana Sekolah Dapat Mengajarkan Sikap Hormat dan Tanggung Jawab. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Majid, A. (2014). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Maryani, Ika. (2014). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Sekolah Adiwiyata Ditinjau Dari Aspek Kegiatan Partisipatif di SDN Ungaran 1 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar Jilid 1, Nomor 3, April 2014. Hal. 170-185

Meimudayanti, L. & Rukmi, S. A. (2013). Pemanfaatan Lingkungan Sekolah Sebagai Sumber Belajar Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Deskripsi Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal PGSD Volume 01 Nomor 02 Tahun 2013, 0-216 Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Hal. 1-12

Mulyasa, E. H. (2014). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rahmah Y. D., dkk. (2014). Implementasi Program Sekolah Adiwiyata (Studi pada SDN Manukan Kulon III/540 Kota Surabaya). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), Vol. 2, No. 4, Hal. 753-757

Rakhmawati, D., dkk. (2016). Peran Program Adiwiyata dalam Pengembangan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan Siswa: Studi Kasus di SMK Negeri 2 Semarang. Unnes Science Education Journal 5 (1), Hal. 1137-1142

Santrock, J. W. (2012). Perkembangan Masa-Hidup, Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga

Supardan, D. (2015). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran: Jilid 2. Bandung: Yayasan Rahardja.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i1.809

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.