Top Five Ranking of Sharia Financial Acades with the Potential of Fraud (Case Study of Three Sharia Commercial Banks) In North Sumatera

M. Yasir Nasution, Andri Soemitra, Wilchan Robain

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to find the top five rankings of sharia finance contracts with the potential for fraud (case study of three sharia commercial banks) in North Sumatra. This research uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods, data analysis with Analytical Networking Process (ANP) techniques through Super Decision Software, conducting open and in-depth interviews with 9 respondents, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with practitioners and sharia finance experts. In this case, it was found that the top five rankings of sharia financial contracts have the potential for fraud (a case study of three sharia commercial banks) in North Sumatra, namely Ijarah 23.34%, murabahah 14.86%, kafalah or kafalah bil ujrah 8.71%, musyarakah 8.22% and mudharabah 6.28%.


Keywords


sharia financial agreements; potential; fraud

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdoerrauf. (1970). Al Quran dan Ilmu Hukum:Comparative Study.Jakarta, Bulan Bintang.

Abu Zahrah, Muhammad, Usul al-Fiqh, Ttp., Dar al-Fikr al-“Arabi, tt.

Al-Bukhari, Shahih al-Bukhari. Ttp., Dar al-Fikr, 1994, III : 47, hadis no. 2204.

Al-Hakim, al-Mustadrak. Riyad, Maktabah wa Matabi’ an-Nasyr al-Haditsyah, tt.

Al-Kasani, Bada’i ash-shana’i fi Tartib asy-Syaraki’, Mesir, Matba’ah al-Jamaliah, 1990

Anwar Samsul, Hukum Perjanjian Syariah, Studi Tentang Teori Akad dalam Fikih Muamalah. Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Ascarya dalam Aam Slamet Rusydiana & Abrista Devi, Analytic Network Process: Pengantar Teori dan Aplikasi, Bogor, SMART Publishing, 2013.

Azhar Basyir, Ahmad. (2004). Asas-Asas Hukum Muamalat. Yogyakarta, UII Press.

Azila Ahmad Sarkawi, Akad-Akad Muamalah Dalam Fiqh, Satu Analisis, Jurnal Syariah 6

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. (1989). Alfiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh, jus IV. Damsyik, Dar al-Fikr.

Bala Shanmugam and Zaha Rina Zahari. (2009). A Primer On Islamic Finance, CFA Institute.

Basya, Mursyid al-Hairan ila Ma’rifah Ahwal al-Insan. Kairo, Dar al-Furjani, 1403/1983.

Budi Abdullah and Beni Ahmad Saebani. (2014). Metode Penelitian Ekonomi Islam (Muamalah), Bandung, Pustaka Setia.

Bunguin Burhan. (2009). Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta, Kencana.

Depatemen Agama RI. (2000). “Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya”. Semarang, CV. Toha Putra.

Departemen Agama RI, Al-qur’anul Karim watarjamah maaniyah ilal lughoh alIndonesiyyah.

Dewi Gemala, Wirdyaningsih, Yeni Salma Barlinti. (2005). Hukum Perikatan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta, Kencana.

Emzir. (2011). Analisis Data: Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.

Geri Hardianto, Harun Delamat, Ahmad Subeki, Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Fraud Di

Bank Syariah Yang Terdaftar Di Bank Indonesia. (2016). Akuntabalitas: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Akuntansi, Vol. 10, No. 1, Januari.

Haifa Najib, Rini. (2016). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Fraud di Bank Syariah, Lampung, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX.

Hendi Suhendi. (2010). Fiqh Muamalah, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hendri, Abrista Devi. (2013). Metode Penelitia Ekonomi Islam, Jakarta, Gramata Publishing.

Ibrahim Warde. (2000). Islamic Finance in the Global Economy, Edinburgh University Press.

Ichsan et al, (2021). Determinant of Sharia Bank's Financial Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P.298-309

Kreuger (1988), dalam Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

Koentjaraningrat, 1986, dalam Burhan Bungin. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.

Lexy J. Moleong. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Cet. Ke-20, Bandung, Remaja Rosda Karya.

Mardani. (2014). Fikih Ekonomi Syariah, Cet. 2, Jakarta, Kencana.

Miles, Mathew B., dan A. Michael Huberman. (1992). Analisis Data Kualiitatif, Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia-UI Press.

Muhadjir. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Yogjakarta, Rakesarasin.

Nawawi, Ismail. (2012).Fikih Muamalah, Bogor, Ghalia Indonesia.

Patton, Michael Quinn. (2006). Metode Evaluasi Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Permadi, Bambang, AHP Pusat Antar Universitas – Studi Ekonomi, Jakarta, Ul, 1992

Prayogo, I and Afrizal, T. (2021). Perceptions of Educators, Accounting Students and Accountants Public Accountant against Ethics of Financial Statement Preparation (Studies at University and KAP in Semarang). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 89-101.

Qomarul Huda. (2011). Fiqh Muamalah, Yogyakarta,Teras.

Rahmani Timorita Yulianti. (2008). Asas-Asas Perjanjian (Akad) Dalam Hukum Kontrak Syari’ah, La_Riba, Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, Vol. II, No. 1, Juli

Reskino dan Muhammad Fakhri Anshori, (2016), Model Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan

Keuangan Dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle. (2016). Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, Vol. 7, No. 2, h. 256-269, Agustus.

Rully Indrawan, Poppy Yuniawati. (2014). Metode Penelitian, Bandung, Penerbit Anditama.

Samsul Anwar. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian Syariah, Studi Tentang Teori Akad dalam Fikih Muamalah, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saaty dan Vargas. (2006). dalam Hendri. (2013). Metode Penelitian Ekonomi Islam, Jakarta, Gramata Publishing.

Steward & Samdasani (1990), dalam Moleong. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. (2003). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif, Yogjakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudarsono Heri. (2004). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah Deskripsi dan Ilustrasi, Yogyakarta, Ekonisia Kampus Fakultas Ekonomi UII, Ed. 2.

Syafe’I, Rachmat. (2001). Fiqih Muamalah. Bandung, Pustaka Setia.

Wahbah az-Zuhaili. (1989). Alfiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh, jus IV, Damsyik: Dar al-Fikr.

Zamir Iqbal and Abbas Mirakhor. (2008). Pengantar Keuangan Islam: Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta, Kencana.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i1.1644

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 157 times
PDF - 98 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.