THE DISCLOSURE OF LIFE EXPERIENCE AND ITS EXPRESSION IN CULTURAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVE

Dwi Retnani Srinarwati

Abstract


One of the key concepts of cultural studies in dealing with "living culture" is the experience and how to articulate it. The articulation of an experience must avoid pure meaning and the addition of excessive analysis. The pattern of interaction, lifestyle, and mind-set observed will bring the ethnographer at the correct level of articulation. In research, cultural studies develop ethnographic methods. Ethnography is a form of socio-cultural research characterized by an in-depth study of the diversity of socio-cultural phenomena of a society. The study was conducted using primary data collection with interview guidelines; research in one or more cases in depth and comparability; data analysis through the interpretation of the function and meaning of thought and action, resulting in the description and analysis verbally. Reality shows that ethnographs often express the experience of "large groups" and reveal less "disadvantaged" parties. Finally a new approach to the research of "new ethnography" is proposed that aims at developing a way of learning and writing that allows the ethnographer to more accurately understand and reveal and articulate the reality of others' lives. New ethnographic practices are often characterized by various strategies, such as collaboration, self-reflexivity, and polvocality. However, coming to its logical conclusion, the new ethnographic search to become a reality for the different realities of life makes one unable to judge between them.


Keywords


cultural studies; life; experience articulation; ethnography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Clifford, J. and Marcus, G.E. (eds) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and Social Identity. Annual Rev. Psychology Vol. 53, 161-186.

Flick, U. (2007). Designing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication.

Gray, Ann. (2003). Research Practice for Cultural Studies: Ethnographic Methods and Lived Cultures. California: SAGE Publications.

Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (eds.) (1997) Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Hall, S. (1996). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: SAGE Publication.

________. (1997). The Circuit of Culture.

Johnson, R. (1997). ‘Reinventing cultural studies: remembering for the best version’, in E. Long, From Sociology to Cultural Studies: New Perspectives. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Kearney, C. (2003) The Monkey’s Mask, Stoke on Trent, UK and Sterling, USA: Trentham Books.

McRobbie, A. (ed.) (1997) Back to Reality? Social Experience and Cultural Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Magee, B. (2003) Clouds of Glory: A Hoxton Childhood, London: Jonathan Cape.

Morris, M. (1997). “A question of cultural studies”, in A. McRobbie (ed.), Back to Reality? Social Experience and Cultural Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Negus, K. and Pickering, M. (2004) Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

Parker, I. (2005). Qualitive Psychology: Introducing Radical Research. New York: Open University Press.

Pickering, Michael. (2008). Research Methods for Cultural Studies. Edinburgh: Endinburgh University Press.

Probyn, E. (1993) Sexing the Self: Gendered Positions in Cultural Studies. NewYork: Routledge.

Saukko, Paula. (2003). Doing Research in Cultural Studies: An Introduction to Classical and New Methodological Approaches. London: SAGE Publication.

Sprears, R. (2011). Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective. In S. S. al, Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 201-223). London: Springer Science+Business Media.

Stewart, A. (1998). The Ethnographer's Method: Qualitative Research Methods Series Volume 46. California: SAGE Publications Inc.

Turner, J. (2000). Social Categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. Lawler, Advance in Group Processes Vol. 2 (pp. 77-122). Greenwich: JAI Press.

Williams. R. (1981). Culture. Glasgow: Collins




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v1i2.18

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 233 times
PDF - 230 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.