Fair Criteria of Private Vocational School and Witnesses in the Perspective of Ushul Fiqh (Analysis Based on Istislahi and Ta'lili Reasoning)
Abstract
The validity of a marriage, if it is equipped with several conditions, including a fair guardian and witnesses. This is as stated in several Hadith narrations, which clearly state that. However, in practice that is carried out by the community there is confusion regarding the fair requirements of guardians and witnesses. The proof is that all parents remain guardians in the process of their daughter's marriage and everyone can be witnesses in the marriage council. Among the scholars, there were disputes over this issue. The Ulama of the Hanafi School do not require fair guardians and witnesses in the marriage contract, even if a witness is allowed to be a man and two women. Meanwhile, for the other three schools, just guardians and witnesses in marriage are a condition for the validity of a marriage. It's just that there is a slight difference in this matter. The Ulama of the Maliki School, the two male witnesses who are just, may be presented after the marriage contract has taken place to testify that the couple is married. As for the Shafi'i School the requirements are rather strict because the fairness of guardians and witnesses must be clear inside and out. Meanwhile, according to the Hanbali School, it is a little light because the fairness of guardians and witnesses can be seen from the outside (mastur 'is). The condition for the fairness of guardians and witnesses based on istislahi theory of reasoning is to produce benefits in terms of hereditary purity. The purity of the offspring is only obtained through a marriage that is legal according to the rules of the Shari'a. The Sharia has established the validity of a marriage in between with a just guardian and witnesses. Based on the theory of ta'lili reasoning, the validity of the marriage contract is due to the existence of a just guardian and witnesses in the marriage.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
‘Abd al-Rahman bin Ibrahim bin Ahmad Abu Muhammad Baha’uddin al-Maqdisi, al-‘Uddah Syarh al-‘Umdah, Juz II, Cet. 2, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2005.
‘Abd Allah bin Mahmud bin Mawdud al-Musili al-Hanafi, al-Ikhtiyar li Ta‘lil al-Mukhtar, cet. III, juz III, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 2005.
‘Abd al-Qadir ‘Awdah, al-Tasyri‘ al-Jina’i al-Islami Muqaranan bi al-Qanun al-Wad‘i, juz II, Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 1997.
Abdur Rahman Ghozali, Fiqh Munakahat, Ed. I, Cet. III, Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Abu al-Hasan ‘Ali bin Muhammad bin Habib al-Basri al-Baghdadi al-Mawardi, Al-Hawi al-Kabir, Juz XIII, Cet. I, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1994.
Al-Buhuti, Kasysyaf al-Qinna’, jld. VI, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, t.t.
Amir Syarifuddin, Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia; antara Fiqh Munakahat dan Undang-undang Perkawinan, Cet. III, Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.
Djamaan Nur, Fiqih Munakahat, Semarang: Dina Utama Semarang, 1993.
Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin ‘Abdullah bin Muhammad Ibn Muflih Abu Ishaq Burhan al-Din, al-Mabda‘ Syarh al-Maqna‘, juz VII, Riyad: Dar ‘Ulum al-Kutub, 2003.
Ibrahim bin Musa bin Muhammad al-Syatibi, al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Syari‘ah, Kairo: Maktabah Tawfiqiyyah, t. t.
Imam Abu Hamid Muhammad bin Muhammad al-Ghazali, al-Mustasfa min ‘Ilmi al-Ushul, Cet. I, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2008.
Imam Abu Zakariyya Muhyi al-Din Yahya bin Syarf al-Nawawi, al-Majmu‘ Syarh al-Muhazzab, Juz XVI, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, t.t.
Imam Alaudin Abi al-Hasan Ali bin Kholil al-Tari Ablasi al-Hanafi, Mu’inul Hukkam, cet. II, Kairo: Mustafa Bab al-Halbi wa Auladah, 1973.
Imam Suprayogo dan Tobroni, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama, Bandung: Rosda Karya, 2003.
Imran, et al. (2019). Tawkil Traditions in the Implementation of Marriage Contract in Aceh, Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (3): 210-218.
Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Rosda Karya, 2005.
M. Idris Ramulyo, Hukum Perkawinan Islam, cet. 2, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1999.
Malik bin Anas bin Malik bin ‘Umar al-Asbuhi al-Madani, al-Mudawwanat al-Kubra, juz II, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, t.t.
Moh. Rifa’i, Ilmu Fiqih Islam Lengkap, Semarang: Toha Putra, 1978.
Muhammad Salam Madkur, al-Ijtihad al-Islam fi al-Tasyri‘ al-Islami, Ttp: Dar al-NahÌah ‘Arabiyah, 1984.
Rahmat Hakim, Hukum Perkawinan Islam, Cet. I, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2000.
Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI-Press, 1986.
Syams al-Din Abi ‘Abd Al-lah Muhammad bin Muhammad bin ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Tarabilisi al-Maghribi, Mawahib al-Jalil li Syarh Mukhtasar al-Khalil, Juz V, Beirut: Dar ‘Ulum al-Kutub, 2003.
Syams al-Din Abi Bakr Muhammad bin Abi Sahl al-Sarakhsi, al-Mabsut, Juz V, Cet. I, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1963
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 93 timesPDF - 83 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.