_.gif)
_.gif)
The Relationship between Self Efficacies to Academic Cheating in Madrasah Aliyah Islamiyah Sunggal
Abstract
This study aims to find out The Relationship between Self Efficacies to Academic Cheating in Madrasah Aliyah Islamiyah Sunggal. Based on the results of the calculation of Product Moment Correlation, it is known that there is a negative relationship between self-efficacy and academic cheating, where Rxy = -0.624 with a significant p = 0.000 <0.05. This means that the lower the self-efficacy, the higher the academic cheating. Conversely, the higher the self-efficacy, the higher the academic cheating. The effective contribution of the self efficacy variable to academic cheating in Madrasah Aliyah Islamiyah Sunggal is 38.9%. While the remaining 61.1% is due to other factors such as moral and religious developments. In general, the results of the research on students of Madrasah Aliyah Islamiyah Sunggal had moderate self-efficacy, because the empirical average value was 89,372 which was smaller than the hypothetical average score of 93.00, while academic fraud was moderate, because the empirical average value was 204,117 which was higher greater than its hypothetical mean of 188.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amir Zubaidah, Risnawati. (2016). Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Anderman, M & Murdock, B. (2007). Psychology of academic cheating. Elsevier Academic Press: USA.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.
Bandura, Albert. (1997). Self Efficacy In Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press.
Bintoro, Wahyu, et al. (2013). Hubungan Self Regulated Learning dengan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa. Vol: 2 no: 1, Oktober 2013. (online). Diakses pada tanggal 27 November 2016.http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/epj/article/view/2587
Cahyadi Surya, Agustiani Hendriati. (2009). Self Efficacy dan Regulasi Belajar Sebagai Prediktor Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol. 24, Nomor 2, hal: Bandung: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran
Clariana, et al. (2013). Academic cheating and gender differences in Barcelona (Spain). Vol: 1 No: 1, Mei 2013. (online). Diakses pada tanggal 06 Desember 2016.http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/summa/v10n1/a06.pdf
Davis, S. F, Drinan. F. P dan Gallant. B. T. (2009). Cheating in School : What We Know and What We Can Do. Singapura: Wiley Blackwell.
Djamarah. (2011). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Hasmayni, Babby. (2019). Prediction of Junior High School National Examination Score on the Leaming Achievement In High School Students In Medan. Proseding Seminar International. NICCT. Proceedings of the First Nommensen International Conference on Creativity & Technology, NICCT. Jilid 1. hhtps://eudi.eu/proceedings/NICCT/2-19. EAI . hhtp://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-9-2019.2296598
Hasmayni, B. (2020). The Difference of Academic Procrastination between Students Who Are Active and Not Active in Organizations Student Activity Units in the Faculty of Psychology University of Medan Area. Britain International of Linguistics, Arts and Education (BioLAE) Journal ISSN: 2685-4813(Online), 2685-4805(Print) Vol.2 (1): 411-421
H Simatupang, B Hasmayni. Perbedaan Minat Sekolah dan MotivasiBelajar Ditinjau dari Pola Asuh Orangtua. Jurnal Magister Psikologi UMA (Analitika). Vol: IV No: 1. Medan : Pasca Psikologi UMA
Hadjar Ibnu. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hamalik. (2001). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung. Bumi Aksara.
Hartinah s. (2008). Perkembangan peserta didik. Jakarta: Aditama.
Hurlock, Elizabeth B. 1980. Psikologi Perkembangan Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang rentang kehidupan.
Latipah, Eva. (2010). Strategi Self Regulated Learning dan Prestasi Belajar: Kajian Meta Analisis. Vol: 37 No. 1, Juni 2010. (online). Diakses pada tanggal 27 November 2016
https://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=books&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiY2Jygr4jRAhWDs48KHUV9CmcQFggZMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fjurnal.ugm.ac.id%2Fjpsi%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F7696%2F5962&usg=AFQjCNHZhbi0kRMzV9Ta3haTQTE0bZ8j9g&sig2=SUc2CITtWWKBsVS8yeLIvQ&bvm=bv.142059868,d.c2I
Ormrod, Ellis. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Membantu Siswa Tumbuh dan Berkembang jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Orosz G, Tóth-Király István, B˝othe Beáta, Kusztor Anikó, Üllei Kovács Zsuzsanna and Miriam. (2016). Teacher Antusiasm: a potential cure of academic cheating. Vol: 6 No. 318, march 2015 (online). Diakses pada tanggal 06 Desember.
https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=L7DTCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA42&dq=Teacher+Enthusiasm:+a+potential+cure+of+academic+cheating&ots=zs2lByATJd&sig=JiOXNsmWaDnkDwjOFuGg_kxKzWs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Teacher%20Enthusiasm%3A%20a%20potential%20cure%20of%20academic%20cheating&f=false
Purnamasari, Desi. (2013). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Semarang. Vol: 2 No: 1, Oktober 2013. (online). Diakses pada tanggal 27 November 2016.http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/epj/article/view/2581
Purwanto, N. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung. P.T. Remaja Rosdakarya
Purwanto. (2008). Metodologi Penelitin Kuantitatif Untuk Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Santrock, W. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan edisi kedua. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Santrock, J. W. (2007). Perkembangan Anak Edisi 11 jilid 2. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Sari, Kartika. (2009). Perbedaan Interaksi Sosial Antara Siswa Yang MengikutiEkstrakurikuler Dengan Siswa Yang Tidak Mengikuti Ekstrakurikuler diSMPN 7 Medan. Universitas Medan Area. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan.
Sulaiman, et al. (2019). The Performance of Lecturer in the Development of Academic Culture in Ilmu Tarbiyah Al-Hilal College of Sigli. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 220-228
Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2005) Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologis, Yogyakarta,Penerbit Andi.
Uno, M. B. (2005). Orientasi Baru Dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.
Warsito, H. (2004). Hubungan Antara Self Efficacy Dengan Penyesuaian Akademik & Perestasi Akademik. Jurnal Psikologi, vol. 14, No.2, Hal 92-109. Bandung : Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjajaran.
Whitley, E & Speagel-keith. (2012). Academic Dishonesty An Educator’s Guide. Lawrence Elbaum Associates New York. (online). Diakses pada tanggal 09 Desember 2016.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=-1B4AgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Academic+Dishonesty+An+Educator%E2%80%99s+Guide&hl=id&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjL34XOsIjRAhXGKo8KHcAnASkQ6AEIGTAA#v=onepage&q=Academic%20Dishonesty%20An%20Educator%E2%80%99s%20Guide&f=false
Wulandari Rien. (2014). Hubungan Self Efficacy Dengan Prestasi Akademik Pada Siswa Kelas XII SMA Negeri 16 Medan. Skripsi. Fakultas Psikologi Medan Area. (Tidak Diterbitkan).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1989
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 135 timesPDF - 107 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.