Law Number 6 Year 2014 Concerning Village; Opportunities for Institutional Strengthening and the Existence of Village Autonomy

Khoiruddin Nasution, M. Arif Nasution, Marlon Sihombing, Heri Kusmanto

Abstract


The regulation of village existence through Law no. 6 of 2014 must be acknowledged as providing opportunities for the growth of village autonomy. A number of pressures in several articles provide discretion that allows village autonomy to grow along with several conditions that must be considered by the village government, village communities. UU no. 6 of 2014 at least encourages its autonomy to make all affairs that have been recognized and respected by the state, plus local scale affairs not just for display, but the accumulation of all assets that allow the village to get richer with the capital it has. This research uses a qualitative approach with case studies as a research strategy. Data were obtained from interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGD) by presenting key informants and also supporting informants from the village government, community leaders and also traditional and religious leaders in Padangsidempuan City. The concept of village development, known as bottom-up development, places the village as a pillar of national economic development. This concept then forces the village to continue to prepare itself in order to achieve village autonomy and independence. Institutional strengthening can be seen from community institutions being given space in planning and implementing development in the village. This shows that Law no. 6 of 2014 has provided space for the community in determining the direction of village development.


Keywords


village autonomy; institutional strengthening; law number 6 of 2014 concerning villages

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angelia, N. et al. (2020). Analysis of Community Institution Empowerment as a Village Government Partner in the Participative Development Process. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 1352-1359

Creswell, John W, Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. California: Sage Publication. 199

Jaweng, R. E. (2012). RUU Tentang Desa: Kritik atas Proposal Minimalisasi Versi Pemerintah, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta

Kushandajani, (2015), Implikasi UU Nomor ^ Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa Terhadap Kewenangan Desa, Yustisia Vol. 4 No. 2, Mei-Agustus 2015, Hal 369-396.

Kusuma, M. K. (2014). “Negaranisasi Desa:Studi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Desa Pacul Dan Desa Kasiman Kabupaten Bojonegoro Pasca Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal: Jurnal UNAIR: Vol 3, tahun 2014.

Labolo, M, (2013). “Memahami Ilmu Pemerintahan”, 6, Jakarta. Rajawali Press

Mutty, M. L. (2012). “Otonomi Desa: Harapan dan Kenyataan, Kasus Luwu Utara, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta

Nasution, P. (1994) “Uraian Singkat tentang Adat Mandailing dan Tata Cara

Rauf, Rahyunir, (2015), Pemerintahan Desa, Zanafa Publishing, Yogyakarta

Rauf, Rahyunir, (2016), Penataan Kelembagaan Pemerintah Desa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa, Wedana Jurnal Pemerintahan, Politik dan Birokrasi, Vol. II Nomor 1 April 2016, Hal 1-15.

Tahir, I, (2013). Sejarah Perkembangan Desa di Indonesia, Desa di Masa Lalu, Masa Kini dan bagaimana Masa Depannya, Jurnal MIPI, Edisi 38, Jakarta

Regulation

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 2005 Tentang Desa




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.2087

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 38 times
PDF - 35 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.