Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis in SBY’s Speech upon Accepting the World Statesman Award

Dwi Maryani Rispatiningsih

Abstract


Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono is the president of Indonesia. He quite famous in the world. It is proved by award that he got as the world statesman conferred by the appeal of conscience foundation in May 29, 2013. This research analyzes deixis in pragmatic point of view on SBY’s speech upon accepting the world statesman award. The data for this research is in form of speech brows from online websites. This research applies a qualitative research. The result of SBY speech show that, he more often person deixis, it show 55 (74%) times, while others, he only use 10 times (14%) for place deixis and 9 (12%) for time deixis. In personal deixis, SBY most use 1st person plural (63.6%) in his speech, that is the word we and our, both of them refer to Indonesian. Thus, in his speech, he represents his self as Indonesian. It is also shown by using of proximal place (80%) along the speech. For time deixis, he more use present tense (45%) because he talk about the event that happens when speech is delivered.


Keywords


pragmatic analysis; deixis; SBY’s speech; world statesman award

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adetunji, A. (2006). Inclusion and Exclusion in Political Discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo's Speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 177-191.

Amilia, F., et al. (2018). Pragmatic Aspects of Definition in Technical Terms Dictionary. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 278-289.

Castro, E. D. (1998). Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism Author(s). The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469-488.

Christopher, A. A. (2012). Deixis and personalization in ad slogans. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 64(1), 526-530.

Cohen, et.al. 2007. Research Method in Education. London: Routledge.

Djenar. 2011. “Deixis and Spatial Expressions in Indonesian Languages”. Paper International Workshop at National Museum of Ethnology (Minpaku). Osaka, June 29 2014.

Dylgjeri and Kazazi. 2013. Deixis in Modern Linguistics and Outside. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. Volume 2, Number 4. PP Retrieved from http:// www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/110 on June29, 2014.

Fillmore. 1982. Lectures on deixis. Stanford CA: CSLI publications

Hasegawa, Yoko. 2012. Deictic and anaphoric uses of the Japanese demonstratives ko-so-a. Journal of Japanese Linguistics. PP 87-96. Retrived from http://hasegawa.berkeley.edu/Papers/JJL28%20 Hasegawa.pdf on June 27, 2014.

Hobson, et.al.. Person-Centred (Deictic) Expressions and Autism. Journal Autism Dev Disorder. PP 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.musicaycolor.com/.../07_Personcentred%20Expressions%20and% on June 27, 2014

Kreidler. 1998. Pragmatic: Critical Concept. London: Routledge

Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press

Li, Y. 2009. A social and prag anlysisof the second person deixis you. Asian Social Science. Volume 5, Number 12. PP 130-133. Retrieved from http://www.academypublisher.com/ojs/index.php/jltr/article/download/.../1804‎ on June 29, 2014.

Lyons. 1977. Semantics, Vols 1&2. Cambrigde: Cambrigde University Press

Matras, Y. 1998. Deixis and deictic oppositions in discourse:Evidence from Romani . Journal of Pragmatics. Issue 29. PP 393-428. Retrieved from http://languagecontact.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/.../Matras,%20Y.%20 on June 27, 2014.

Morales, M.M. 2011. How the Deictic and Anaphoric Role of Na in Filipino Functions as a Cohesive Device in Classroom Interaction. Philippine ESL Journal. PP 66-80. Retrieved from http://www.philippine-esl-journal.com/V6_A4.pdf on June 29, 2014.

Mey, J. L. 1993. Pragmatic an Introduction. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publisher.

Nunan, D. 1992. Research Method in Language Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ogeyik, M.C. 2007. Deictic Expressions and the Types of Deixis in Turkish Narratives. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture. PP 8-18. Retrieved from www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/JOURNAL/ on June 29, 2014.

Su, Y. 2010. A Corpus-based Contrastive Analysis of First Personal Deixis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Volume 1, Number 3, PP. 231-234. Retrieved from on June 27, 2014.

Supriyadi, S. (2020). Pragmatic Analysis on G.M. Sudarta’s Caricatures in Kompas Newspaper. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute- Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 367-378

West, D.E. 2011. Deixis as a symbolic phenomenon Donna E. linguistik online. PP 89- 100. Retrieved from http://www.linguistik-online.de/50_11/west.pdf on June 27, 2014.

Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatic. Oxford: Oxford University Press

http://www.setkab.go.id/pidato-8871-speech-by-he-susilo-bambang-yudhoyono-upon-accepting-the-world-statesman-award-conferred-by-the-appeal-of-conscience-foundation-new-york-29-may-2013.html




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2130

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 73 times
PDF - 37 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.