Bankruptcy Analysis as a Basis for Discontinuous Termination of Notaries

Amira Ulfah

Abstract


A notary is a public official authorized to do authentic deeds and has other authorities referred to in Law Number 30 of 2004. In light of this, the author concludes that Article 12 letter a of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of a Notary contains a legal ambiguity. As a result, the authors are interested in investigating bankruptcy as a reason for a notary's dishonourable dismissal. In terms of data, this study relies on qualitative. However, from the results and discussion above, it can be concluded that the Notary is classified as an individual legal subject rather than a legal entity under bankruptcy law. So, suppose a Notary is declared bankrupt. In that case, he or she loses only their authority to manage assets listed in the bankruptcy register, but not their position. Therefore, due to bankruptcy decisions, notaries cannot be dishonourably dismissed from their positions.


Keywords


notary; bankruptcy decisions; dishonourably dismissed

Full Text:

PDF

References


Foresta, A. (2017). PEMBERHENTIAN NOTARIS DENGAN TIDAK HORMAT AKIBAT DINYATAKAN PAILIT (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS JAMBI).

Hartanto, D. (2020). Sociology Review of Social Phenomenon, Social Rules and Social Technology. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 1175-1184

Hulu, F. (2020). Honorarium Notary for Legal Services in Making Authentic Deed. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 3, No.4, Page: 2893-2897

Lestari, K. A. I., & Priyanto, I. M. D. PEMBERHENTIAN NOTARIS DENGAN TIDAK HORMAT AKIBAT DINYATAKAN PAILIT BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 2 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG JABATAN NOTARIS.

Mahendra, R. (2019). Analisis yuridis pengangkatan kembali jabatan notaris setelah direhabilitasi dari kepailitan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pelita Harapan).

Maylaksita, A. (2019). Problematik Interpretasi Pengaturan Kepailitan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 4(1), 126-145.

Prastyo, H. (2018). Akibat Hukum terhadap Akta yang dibuat oleh atau dihadapan Notaris setelah Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Repertorium, 5(2).

Puspaningrum, G. (2019). Notaris Pailit dalam Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. DIVERSI: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 199-217.

Rato, D., & Setyawan, F. Makna Kepailitan Sebagai Alasan Pemberhentian Jabatan Notaris (Doctoral dissertation).

ROSELINA, W. Prinsip Debt Collection Dalam Kepailitan Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum (Doctoral dissertation).

SAMSI, S. (2005). TINJAUAN TERHADAP PAILIT SEBAGAI SALAH SATU ALASAN PEMBERHENTIAN NOTARIS, BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG JABATAN NOTARIS THE EVALUATE TO BANKRUPT AS ONE OF REASON TO NOTARY CESSATION PURSUANT OF LAW NUMBER 30 YEAR 2004 ABOUT NOTARY POSITION (Doctoral dissertation, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro).

Sanjaya, R., Susilowati, E., & Mahmudah, S. (2016). Kajian terhadap Kepailitan Notaris di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4), 1-16.

Santoso, P. P. (2015). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pengangkatan Kembali Notaris Yang Telah Dinyatakan Pailit Oleh Pengadilan. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum.

WARDHANA, A. S., & NURUL, H. Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Pemberhentian Tidak Dengan Hormat Terhadap Notaris Akibat Kepailitan (Doctoral dissertation).

Wiryawan, A. W. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Notaris Yang Dinyatakan Pailit Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Lex Renaissance, 5(1), 193-206.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2177

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 20 times
PDF - 19 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.