The Prosecution by the Pidie State Prosecutor Against the Criminal Action of Corruption Gampong Income and Shopping Budget

Suhaibah Suhaibah, Armiwal Armiwal, Afdhalul Gunawar

Abstract


Law Number 6 of 2014 also strengthens the allocation of Village funds (ADD) originating from the Regency/City balancing funds. If previously there were almost no districts/cities that provided ADD at least 10 percent of the balancing fund without any sanctions, then Article 72 of the Village Law gives the government the right to impose sanctions by delaying and even deducting the balancing fund in the amount of the allocation of funds not given to Village. Aim for knowing the prosecution process by the Pidie State Prosecutor's Office against the perpetrators of corruption in the Gampong Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBG) and obstacles in the prosecution process by the Pidie State Prosecutor's Office. This research is a type of empirical juridical normative research, data collection in research is carried out through library and field research. Literature research by studying books, laws and regulations. Field research by interviewing respondents and informants.The results showed that the prosecution process by the Pidie State Prosecutor's Office against perpetrators of corruption in the Gampong Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBG). Technically, the receipt of the case is recorded in the register of receipt of case files, and the report is reported using the LP. In the event that the investigation is considered complete, the investigator hands over the responsibility for the suspect and evidence to the public prosecutor. At this stage, the examination of the suspect is intended to avoid making mistakes in persona being prosecuted before the trial. Obstacles in the prosecution process by the Pidie District Attorney against perpetrators of corruption in the Gampong Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBG).


Keywords


prosecution; crime; corruption; APBG

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmad Ali. 2011. Menguak Tabir Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia: Bogor.

Andi Hamzah. 2007. Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.

---------------. 2011. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di dalam KUHP. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Elwi Dani. 2014. Korupsi (Konsep, Tindak Pidana, dan Pemberantasannya). Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.

Ermansjah Djaja. 2009. Memberantas Korupsi Bersama Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Evi Hartanti. 2009. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Hartono. 2010. Penyidikan dan Penegakkan Hukum Melalui Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Ladeng Marpaung. 2011. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan). Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

O.C. Kaligis & Assocites. 2006. Pengawasan Terhadap Jaksa Selaku Penyidik Tindak Pidana Khusus dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi. PT. Alumni: Bandung.

Peraturan Jaksa Agung: Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor Per-009/A/Ja/01/2011 tentang Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor Per-006/A/JA/03/2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor Per- 009/A/Ja/01/2011 tentang Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia

Peraturan Presiden: Peraturan Presiden Nomor 38 Tahun 2010 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

Purba, I. G., Syahrin, A. (2019). Demand against Law and Using Authority in Corruption Criminal Action. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 2, No 4, Page: 194-206

S. Wojowasito dan W. J. S. Poerwadarminta. 2007. Kamus Bahasa Inggris Indonesia. Hasta: Bandung.

Soesilo Prajogo. 2007. Kamus Hukum Internasional dan Indonesia. Wacana Intelektual.

Sudarto. 2007. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni: Bandung.

Teguh Prasetya. 2012. Hukum Pidana. Rajawali Pers: Jakarta.

Tri Rama K. tt. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Mitra Pelajar 80 Victor M. Situmorang. 1990. Tindak Pidana Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2011 tentang Intelijen Negara.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas

Undangp-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Wiyono. 2009. Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Yesmil Anwar dan Adang. 2011. Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Konsep, Komponen, dan Pelaksanaannya dalam Penegakkan Hukum di Indonesia). Widya Padjajaran: Bandung.

Zainal Abidin Farid. 2014. Hukum Pidana 1. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Zulyadi, R. (2020). Judge's Role in Court to Eradicate Corruption According to Law Number 20 in 2001 (Study of Decision 16/PID.SUS.K/2011/PN.MDN). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 3, No 2, Page: 1280-1288




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2225

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 29 times
PDF - 25 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.