Students' Politeness Strategies to Lecturers in Sending Messages through WhatsApp

Veronika Unun Pratiwi, Atikah Anindyarini

Abstract


One of the issues that students face today is a lack of politeness in their language. Students' politeness is reflected in their attitudes when sending messages to lecturers. The objective of this study was to determine how polite students are when communicating with their lecturers through WhatsApp.  This study was conducted at a private university in Sukoharjo. The data was obtained from student texts in the lecturer's WhatsApp app. The data was analyzed using Brown and Levinson's (1987) FTA theory on politeness strategies. According to the findings of the study, some students were found sending messages without greeting the lecturers and instead conveying their intentions directly. FTAs are common, and students frequently threaten the lecturers' faces. The words used in a student's message can have an effect on the teacher's feelings and make the conversation appear informal. Students appear to be unaware of social distance, roles and status, and power dynamics when interacting with lecturers. Some students treat lecturers as equals, which comes across as rude and disrespectful. It is strongly suggested that this topic be expanded upon and discussed in a broader context and area for future research. More research could look at this issue from a different perspective.


Keywords


Face Threatening Act (FTA), politeness strategy; student-lecturer; WhatsApp

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwasilah, A. C. (2011). Pokoknya kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Abid, Syaiful. (2019). "Kesantunan Berbahasa Mahasiswa terhadap Dosen di Media Sosial WhatsApp", Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Daerah dan Asing, https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/semiba/article/view/10302

Amilia, F., et al. (2020). Pragmatic Aspects of Definition in Technical Terms Dictionary. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 278-289

Arifin. (2012). Bahan Ajar Pragmatik. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Tidak Diterbitkan

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishing Corporation

Connole, H., Smith, B., & Wiseman, R. (1993). Research Methodology 1: Issues and Methods in Research. Victoria: Deakin.

Elmianvari, A., & Kheirabadi, R. (2013). The Study of EFL Students’ Requests Based on Politeness Theory. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2). doi:10.4304/jltr.4.2.375-385

Emilia, E. (2011, July). Data collection techniques. Paper presented at SEAMEON Regional Centre for QITEP (The Training on Research Methodology for Foreign Language Teachers), Jakarta.

Eshghinejad, S., & Moini, M. R. (2016). Politeness Strategies Used in Text Messaging: Pragmatic Competence in an Asymmetrical Power Relation of Teacher-Student. SAGE Open, 6 (1), 215824401663228. doi:10.1177/2158244016632288

Fitriani, R.S. (2015). Kesantunan Tuturan Imperatif Siswa SMK Mihammadiyah 2 Bandung: Kajian Pragmatik, Ranah, 1, (4) Juli 2015

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

Kasper, G. (1994). Politeness: The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Pergamon Press: Oxford.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman's Place. Basic Books: Harper Row.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.

Mahmud, M. (2019). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8 (3), 597. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15258

Manipuspika, Y. S., & Sudarwati, E. (2017). Politeness strategies in text messaging (A case study of students' text messages to the lecturers in English study program Universitas Brawijaya ). MALTESAS MultiDisciplinary Research Journal (MIRJO), 2 (1), 1-13.

Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. California: Sage Publications.

Pratamanti, E.D., Riana, R., & Setiadi, S. (2017). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam pesan WhatsApp mahasiswa yang ditunjukan kepada dosen. Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 19, (2), Desember 2017, pp 230-239

Prayitno, H.J. (2010). Perwujudan Prinsip Kerja Sama, Sopan Santun, dqn Ironi Para Pejabat dalam Peristiwa Rapat Dinas di Lingkungan Pemkot Berbudaya Jawa.Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 1 (22), Juni 2010: pp.30-46

Rabiah, S. (2012). Language as a Tool for Communication and Cultural Reality Discloser. 1st International Conference on Media, Communication and Culture “Rethinking Multiculturalism: Media in Multicultural Society” organized by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta and Universiti Sains Malaysia on November, 7th - 8th 2012 in Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia, p.4

Searle. J. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Reprinted in D. Carbaugh (ed), 1990. Cultural Communication and Intercultural Contact. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Supriyadi, S. (2020). Pragmatic Analysis on G.M. Sudarta‟s Caricatures in Kompas Newspaper. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), p. 367-378.

Traugott, E. C & Pratt, M. L. (1980). Linguistics. New York: London

Wallace, M. J. (2001). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Victoria: Blackwell publishing.

Yati & Suprapti (2016). Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Kimia Tahun 2012 kepada Dosen melalui media Short Message Service, Jurnal Risenologi KPM UNJ, 1 (2) Oktober 2016

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yulia, M. F. (2016). Politeness issues in communication over text messages. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-4) (pp. 54-61). Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/sel t/article/viewFile/6961/5495




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2402

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 42 times
PDF - 21 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.