Factors Affecting CSR Disclosure on Palm Oil Companies in Indonesia

Asep Effendi


The expansion of oil palm cultivation in Indonesia has begun to grow rapidly over the last few decades. Private and government companies play a role in the expansion of oil palm cultivation which currently has a high selling value in the national and global markets. However, the impact of the palm oil industry has a considerable risk both environmentally and socially. To reduce the risk of social conflict with local communities, oil palm companies have begun to increase their attention to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility as an encouragement to increase public confidence in the achievement of efforts to improve and improve the environment around the company. The information provided must be transparent and accountable for its social activities so that disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is important. This study aims to analyze the factors that influence the disclosure of CSR reports in 2017-2019. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative with purposive random sampling technique, the number of samples is 7 companies that have stable profits and annual report records listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This research uses the multiple linear regression analysis methods and t-test. The results showed that there was a significant influence between leverage ratios, public ownership, firm size (size), on the disclosure of social responsibility (CSRD). On the other hand, there is no positive and significant effect of the profitability ratio on the disclosure of social responsibility (CSRD).



oil palm expansion; disclosure of social responsibility (csr); profitability; leverage; size

Full Text:



Abd Rahman, N. W., Zain, M. M., & Al‐Haj, N. Y. (2011). CSR disclosures and its determinants: evidence from Malaysian government link companies. Social Responsibility Journal.

Afriyanti, D., Kroeze, C., & Saad, A. (2016). Indonesia palm oil production without deforestation and peat conversion by 2050. Science of the Total Environment, 557, 562-570.

Asmeri, R., Alvionita, T., & Gunardi, A. (2017). CSR disclosures in the mining industry: Empirical evidence from listed mining firms in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of sustainability accounting and Management, 16-22.

Brown, E., & Cloke, J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in higher education. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 8(3), 474-483.

Campbell, D. J. (2000). Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer Pic corporate reports, 1969-1997. Accounting Forum, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 80-100.

Chen, Y. C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. ournal of accounting and economics, 65(1), 169-190.

Cowen, S. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 111-122.

Deegan, C. (2006). Legitimacy theory n Z. Hoque {ed.), Methodological Issues in accounting research: Theories and methods. London, U.K: Spiramus.

Deegan, C. (2009). Financial accounting theory. North Ryde, NSW, Australia: McGraw Hill.

Farache, F., & Perks, K. J. (2010). CSR advertisements: a legitimacy tool? Corporate Communications: An International Journal.

Fauzi, H. (2009). Redefining CSR Concept in Indonesia. Jakarta Post.

Fauzi, H., & Idris, K. (2009). The relationship of CSR and financial performance: New evidence from Indonesian companies. ssues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 3(1).

Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149-178.

Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. ournal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149-178.

Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. In (Mashall, MA Pitman, 1984).

Gatti, R. C., Liang, J., Velichevskaya, A., & Zhou, M. (2019). Sustainable palm oil may not be so sustainable. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 48-51.

Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1988). Corporate social reporting: emerging trends in accountability and the social contract. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(1), 6-20.

Gunawan, J. (2013). Determinant factors of corporate social disclosures in Indonesia. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 7(2), 113-134.

Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). he impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal Accounting and public policy, Vol 24 No. 5 291-430.

Hansen, S. B., Padfield, R., Syayuti, K., Evers, S., Zakariah, Z., & Mastura, S. (2015). Trends in global palm oil sustainability research. Journal of cleaner Production, 100, 140-149.

Hasibuan, A. S., et al. (2020). The Analysis of the Effect of Determinant Factors of Palm Oil Plantation Sector on Agricultural Sector Growth in North Sumatera. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 3, No 2, May 2020, Page: 1083-1094

Hassan, M. A., Yee, L. N., Yee, P. L., Ariffin, H., Raha, A. R., Shirai, Y., & Sudesh, K. (2013). Sustainable production of polyhydroxyalkanoates from renewable oil-palm biomass. Biomass and bioenergy, 50, 1-9.

Hatane, S. E., Pranoto, A. N., Tarigan, J., Susilo, J. A., & Christianto, A. J. (2020). The CSR Performance and Earning Management Practice on the Market Value of Conventional Banks in Indonesia. Global Challenges and Strategic Disruptors in Asian Businesses and Economies (pp. 196-213). IGI Global.

Hermawan, M., & Mulyawan, S. (2014). Profitability and corporate social responsibility: An analysis of Indonesia’s listed company. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 3(1).

Hidayat, D. W. (2017). The Influence of Size, Return on Equity, and Leverage on the disclosure of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Manufacturing Companies.

Indraswari, G. D., & Astika, I. P. (2015). Pengaruh profitabilitas, ukuran perusahaan, dan kepemilikan saham publik terhadap pengungkapan csr. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 11(1), 289-302.

Joseph, C., Gunawan, J., & Sawani, Y. (2016). A comparative study of anti-corruption practice disclosure among Malaysian and Indonesian Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) best practice companies. ournal of cleaner production, 112, 2896-2906.

Kemp, M. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Quixotic Dream or Confident Expectation? Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper, Number 6, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). he integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 17(1), 15-26.

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Marnelly, T. R. (2012). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Tinjauan teori dan praktek di Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis, 2(2), 49-59.

Mobus, J. L. (2005). Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context. ccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Mukherjee, I., & Sovacool, B. K. (2014). Palm oil-based biofuels and sustainability in southeast Asia: A review of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 37, 1-12.

Nawaiseh, M. E. (2015). Do Firm Size and Financial Performance Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Employees' and Environmental Dimensions? American Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(12), 967.

O’donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403-445.

Putra, E. N., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2011). Pengaruh karakteristik perusahaan terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Doctoral dissertation. Universitas Diponegoro).

Putri, R. A. (2014). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, dan Leverage Terhadap Pengungkapan CSR. Business Accounting Review, 2(1), 61-70.

Riantani, S., & Nurzamzam, H. (2015). Analysis of company size, financial leverage, and profitability and it’s effect to CSR disclosure. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), 6(2).

Ridho, T. (2017). CSR in Indonesia: Сompanys perception and implementation. he EUrASEANs: journal on global socio-economic dynamics, (3 (4)), 68-74.

Rifqiyah, R. F. (2016). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Kepemilikan Saham Publik terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Doctoral dissertation, STIE Perbanas Surabaya.

Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, organizations and society, 17(6), 595-612.

Rustiarini, N. W. (2011). Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan saham pada pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 6(1), 1-24.

Sacconi, L. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a model of'Extended'Corporate Governance: an explanation based on the economic theories of social contract, reputation and reciprocal conformism. LIUC, Ethics, Law and Economics Paper, 142.

Siregar, S. V., & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting: empirical evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management.

Stacia, E., & Juniarti, J. J. (2016). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Nilai Perusahaan di Sektor Pertambangan. Business Accounting Review, 4(1), 81-90.

Sukmono, A. (2013). The legal framework of CSR in Indonesia. CSR in Indonesia: Legislative Developments and Case Studies. Utrecht University and Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia: Konstitusi Press.

Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113-124.

Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S. O. (2009). What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: a study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 352-364.

Waagstein, P. R. (2011). The mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and implications. Journal of business ethics, 98(3), 455-466.

Welker, M. A. (2009). “Corporate security begins in the community”: mining, the corporate social responsibility industry, and environmental advocacy in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 24(1), 142-179.

Wirth, H., Kulczycka, J., Hausner, J., & Koński, M. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: Communication about social and environmental disclosure by large and small copper mining companies. Resources Policy, 49, 53-60.

Yanti, N., & Budiasih, I. (2016). engaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage dan Ukuran Perusahaan pada Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 17(3), 1752-1779.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2527

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 41 times
PDF - 10 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.