Juridic Review on Authentic Dedies as a Tool of Evidence in Civil Cases at the State Court of Samarinda

Ibnu Arly, Dian Ariani

Abstract


Notary Public is a public official who is appointed by law in making an authentic deed and at the same time a notary is an extension of the Government. authentic deed is a guarantee of certainty and legal protection as a concrete form of actions, events, and legal relations that occur in society. the purpose of this research is to find out the authentic deed proof in court and to know the legal consequences of the authentic deed containing false information. The benefits or uses of this research are in the form of theoretical and practical benefits.This research uses empirical legal research that examines the applicable legal provisions and what happens in reality in the community. Empirical juridical research is legal research on the application or implementation of normative legal provisions in action on any particular legal event that occurs in the community. Or in other words that is a study conducted on the actual situation or real conditions that occur in the community with a view to knowing and finding the facts and data needed, after the required data is collected then leads to the identification of problems that ultimately lead to problem solving. The results of the study explained that the legal power of a notary deed in the process of proof in a court is perfect and binding, so that it does not need to be made or supplemented with other evidence, the deed still exists which is canceled is the contents of the deed (the legal relationship). As well as the legal consequences of an authentic deed containing false information is that the authentic deed has caused a dispute and is brought to court, therefore the injured party can file a civil suit in court so that the judge can decide and grant the cancellation of the deed.


Keywords


legal consequences; authentic deed; proof

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulkadir Muhammad. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti

Abdul Ghofur Anshori. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia fresfektif Hukum Dan Etika, Yogyakarta, UII Press

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1989). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta, Balai Pustaka

G. H. S. Lumban Tobing. (1883). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Jakarta, Erlangga

Habib Adjie, Hukum Notaris Indonesia. (2008). Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Bandung, Refika Aditama

Habib Adjie. (2008). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik, Bandung, Refika Aditama

Habib Adjie. (2015). Penapsiran Tematik Hukum Notaris Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-UndangvNomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Bandung, Rafika Aditama

Habib Adjie dan Muhammad Hafidh. (2007). Akta Notaris untuk Perbankkan Syariah, Bandung, Citra Aditia Bakti

Habib Adjie. (2015). Kebatalan Dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris, Bandung, Rafika Aditama, Bandung

Hari Sasangka dan Ahmad Rifai. (2005). Perbandingan HIR Dengan RBG Disertai Dengan Yurisprudensi MARI dan Kompilasi PeraturanHukum Acara Perdata, Jember, MandarMaju, 2005

Henry Campbell Black. (1979). Black’s Law Dictionary, Amerika Serikat, West Publishing Co.

Hikmahanto Juwana, Perancangan kontrak Modul I sampai dengan VI, Jakarta, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum “IBLAM”

H. Salim HS. (2015). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu (Konsep Teoritis, Kewenangan Notaris, Bentuk dan Minuta Akta, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada

Herlin Budiono. (2012). Peluang dan Hambatan Implementasi Cyber Notary di Indonesia, Seminar nasional “Eksistensi Notaris dalam Aktivitas Cyber Notary”, Bandung

H.R. Deang Naji, Teknik Pembuatan Akta, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Yustisia

Hulu, F. (2020). Honorarium Notary for Legal Services in Making Authentic Deed. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 2893-2897.

Ira Koesoemawati, Yunirman Rijan. (2009). Ke Notaris, Jakarta, Raih Asa Sukses

Irawan Soerodjo. (2003). Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia, Surabaya, Arkola,

Muhammad Yahya Harahap. (1986). segi-segi hukum perjanjian, Bandung, Alumni

M. Ali Boedianto. (2005). Kompilasi Kaidah Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung, Hukum Acara Perdata, Bandung, Swa Justitia

Philipus M. Hadjon. (2001). Formulir Pendaftaran Tanah Bukan Akta Otentik. Surabaya Post

Retno wulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartowinoto. (1986). Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung, Alumni

R. Subekti. (1982). Hukum Acara Perdata, Bandung, Bina Cipta

R. Soegondo Notodisoerjo. (1982). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia, Suatu Penjelasan, Jakarta, Rajawali

R. Soegondo. (1982). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia, Jakarta, Rajawali

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Liberty

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2012). Prosedur Penelitiaan Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta

Subekti. (2005). Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramitha,

Sjaifurracman. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, Bandung, Mandar Maju

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (1999). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Yogyakarta, Liberty

Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia

Tan Thong Kie, Studi Notaris. (1994). Serba-Serbi Praktik Notaris, Jakarta, Ictiar Baru Vanhoeve,

Wiryono Prodjodikoro. (1989). Asas-asas hukum perjanjian, Bandung, Balei

Yosi Andika Mulyadi. (2016). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Otentik Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris Dalam Perkara pidana,Yogyakarta




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2713

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 7 times
PDF - 4 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.