The Implementation of Principle of Accuracy as a Test Stone for State Administrative Decisions

Mafruhah Mafruhah, Rr Herini Siti Aisyah, Farah Zhafirah Anindyaputri, Heru Irianto

Abstract


Based on Article 53 of Law 9/2004, it is regulated that the basis for a lawsuit against the KTUN is the prevailing laws and regulations and the AUPB. In its development, Law 30/2014 was born which in Article 10 regulates the classification of the AUPB. One of the principles that have just been classified as AUPB in this provision is the principle of accuracy. In fact, this principle of accuracy has often been used as a touchstone by judges against a State Administrative Court. Based on this, the formulation of the problem in this article is First, the general principles of good governance as a touchstone for KTUN and Second, the application of the principle of accuracy as a test stone for KTUN. This research is legal research using statutory approach, conceptual approach, and the case approach. Based on the results of the research in this article, it was found that first, the classification of AUPB as a touchstone against KTUN, namely in the explanation of Article 53 paragraph (2) point b of Law 9/2004, AUPB which is specifically regulated in Law 30/2014, and, AUPB outside of Law 30/2014. As for the application of the Accuracy Principle as a Test Stone for KTUN, before Law 30/2014 came into effect, it had often been used as a test stone for KTUN, for example in the Kupang District Administrative Court Decision Number 5/G/2012/PTUN-KPG, Supreme Court Decision No. 150 K/TUN/1992, Supreme Court Decision No. 213 K/TUN/2007, Supreme Court Decision No. 101 K/TUN/2014, and Decision No. 02/G/2013 /PTUN JKT.


Keywords


general principle of good governance; principles of accuracy; state administrative decisions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrianto, B. O., Nugraha, X., & Grady, N. (2018). Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 43–62.

Akhmaddhian, S. (2018). Asas-Asas dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan yang Baik untuk Mewujudkan Good Governace. Logika : Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 09(1), 30–38.

Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang Undang (Legisprudence),-Volume I, Pemahaman Awal. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Charity, M. L. (2015). Paradigma Baru Sistem Penyelenggaraan Administrasi Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(3), 1–25.

Effendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris (Cetakan ke). Kencana.

Gandaria, R. Y. (2015). Mplementasi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AAUPB) Dalam Mewujudkan Prinsip Good Governance And Clean Government Di Pemerintahan Daerah. Lex Administratum, 3(6), 5–13. http://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/ijcs/portugues/2018/v3103/pdf/3103009.pdf%0Ahttp://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-75772018000200067&lng=en&tlng=en&SID=5BQIj3a2MLaWUV4OizE%0Ahttp://scielo.iec.pa.gov.br/scielo.php?script=sci_

Haryono. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Substantif (Studi Putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VII/2012). Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.1.20-39

HR, R. (2020). Hukum Administrasi Negara (Cetakanke-). Rajawali Pres.

John Rawls. (2009). A Theory of Justice (Revised Ed). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, 01(1), 13–22. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/crepido/

Kadouf, H. A., & Quadri, K. M. (2017). Latin Legal Phrases, Terms and Maxims as Applied by the Malaysian Courts. Partridge.

Kozhevnikov, V. V. (2020). Status of the Modern General Theory of the State and Law in the System of the Legal Sciences. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 3, No 2, Page: 738-746.

Kusdarini, E. (2017). Gugatan pelanggaran asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang Baik setelah berlakunya UU Administrasi Pemerintahan melalui PTUN Yogyakarta. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 14(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i1.14564

M.Hadjon, P. (1994). Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum Dogmasir (Normatif). Yuridika, 6.

Manan, B., & Magnar, K. (1997). Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara. Alumni.

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Revisi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Marzuki, P. M. (2020). Teori Hukum. In Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (Edisi Pert, Vol. 28, Issues 1–3). Prenada Media. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol28.no1-3.532

Mertokusumo, S. (1989). Mengenal Hukum. Liberty.

Nugraha, X., & Katherina, A. M. F. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Promotor Perseroan Terbatas Terhadap Kontrak Pra Inkorporasi Di Indonesia. Media Iuris, 2(127–155).

Pratiwi, C. S., Yulita, C., Fauzi, & Purnamawati, S. A. (2016). Penjelasam Hukum: Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AUPB) Hukum Administrasi. Judicial Sector Support Program, 1–132.

Putrijanti, A., Leonard, L. T., Utama, & Widya, K. (2018). Peran PTUN dan AUPB Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance). Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.33056

Ridwan. (2014). Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. FH UII Pres.

Setiawan, P. J., Nugraha, X., & Tanbun, E. P. (2021). Reformulation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Public Information Requests to Achieve Constructive Law Enforcement and Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i1.122

Sidharta, B. A. (1995). Refleksi Tentang Hukum. In Cittra Aditya Bhakti. Citra Aditya Bakti. https://docplayer.info/58918270-Refleksi-tentang-hukum.html

Simanjuntak, E. (2018). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi & Refleksi. Sinar Grafika.

Solechan. (2019). Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Pelayanan Publik. Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(3), 541–557.

Wiyono, R. (2013). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sinar Grafika.

Yuliana. (2016). Dampak Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Kondisi Kejiwaan Terpidana Mati Di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 1(1), 45–




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2785

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2 times
PDF - 2 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.