Understanding Article 102b of the Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No. 70 Year 2021 Regarding the Second Amendment to the Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No. 132 of 2018 Regarding the Coaching of the Administration of Owned Apartment

Gunawan Widjaja

Abstract


The Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No.70 Year 2021 regarding the Second Amendment to the Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No.132 Year 2018 regarding the Coaching of the Administration of Owned Apartment, which was issued on September 1, 2021, has made changes in several provisions in the previous Governor's Regulation. One of the changes is Article 102B. This study discusses the meaning of the change, thoughts on the implementation, and its transitions. This research is normative legal research, which uses secondary data. The analysis was carried out qualitatively through a descriptive-analytical approach to find answers to the objectives of this study. As a guide, this research conducts analysis using Gustav Radbruch’s perspective.


Keywords


Condominium; revocation of ratification; temporary management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexy, R. (n.d.). “Gustav Radbruch’s Concept of Law.” from https://www.upjs.sk/public/media/16913/Gustav%20Radbruch's%20Concept%20of%20Law.pdf

Bix, Brian H. (2011). “Radbruch's Formula and Conceptual Analysis.” 56 AM. J. JURIS. 45, from https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/450.

Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No.132 Year 2018 regarding the Coaching of the Administration of Owned Apartment;

Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No.133 Year 2019 regarding Amendments to Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No.132 Year 2018 regarding the Coaching of the Administration of Owned Apartment;

Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No.70 of 2021 regarding the Second Amendment to Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No.132 Year 2018 regarding the Coaching of the Administration of Owned Apartment.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No.30 Year 2014 regarding Government Administration (State Gazette of 2014, No. 292, Supplement No. 5601);

Leawoods, H. (2000). “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher.” 2 Wash. U. J. L. & Poly 489 from http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol2/iss1/16

Perdana, A. A., et al. (2019). Society Response to Mobile Services on Mobile on The Road Investment Services and Integrated One-Stop Licensing Services in Tebing Tinggi City. Britain International of Humanties and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 44-52.

Radbruch, G. (1945). “Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy (1945)”, translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson, Oxford, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1 (2006), pp. 13–15 doi:10.1093/ojls/gqi042

Radbruch, G. (1946). “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1956)”, translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Volume 26, Issue 1, Spring 2006, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041

Wolf, E. (1958). "Revolution or Evolution in Gustav Radbruch's Legal Philosophy" (1958). Natural Law Forum. Paper 25, from http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum/25




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2841

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 48 times
PDF - 5 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.