Mass Media and Religious Sentiment (A Discourse Analysis of Newspapers in Medan City)

Muhammad Thariq

Abstract


The study in this study used a discourse text analysis model to find out and explain the positions of three wary, Analysis and Sinar Indonesia Baru (SIB) newspapers in presenting the issue of the collapse of Al-Ikhlas Mosque at Timor Medan throughout 2012. This study also wanted to know the policy process media in determining one  news that will be presented to the reader including determining the issue, title, content of news, paragraphs, placement of news and news sources, especially related to the presentation of the news of the mosque's collapse. The goal is to look at the three newspaper mechanisms examined in producing news, journalists' relations with the media and media editors managing the news. The unit of analysis studied is news of events / hard (straight news / hard news) and news of interviews or analysis (news analysis). Researchers used the main theories of media discourse structure, media construction and media cognition from van. This research was carried out with three steps namely text, social cognition and context. In the text study, the researcher used two methods: analyzing the content with quantitative-descriptive and analyzing the framing of Robert Entmann. From the results of news framing, researchers conducted an in-depth interview with the editor in chief / editor of each newspaper studied to uncover and strengthen the results of the study as in the van Dijk model media text analysis phase. Interviews were conducted to determine the editorial / journalist's social cognition processes in the wary, Analysis and Sinar Indonesia Baru newspapers in constructing and interpreting the news of the collapse of the Al-Ikhlas Mosque. The results obtained from the three newspapers about the study were discourses framed by three newspapers about the news of the collapse of the Al-Ikhlas Mosque which had a difference: first, the wary  Daily expressed the truth with the background of the case problem so that it clearly showed its attitude against the mosque collapse. whereas Analysis and Sinar Indonesia Baru are more "safe looking". Secondly, the Daily wary, Analysis, and Sinar Indonesia Baru in constructing the collapse of the Al-Ikhlas mosque are strongly influenced by the background of the newspaper and its readers, and the editor's interpretation is influenced by religious and ethnic sentiments of the newspaper owner's background to strengthen the wary (Islam) Daily ideology. Analysis (ethnic Chinese) and Sinar Indonesia Baru (Christians) in the midst of the community which ultimately makes inconsistencies in the meaning and delivery of messages from the reality of the destruction of the Al-Ikhlas Mosque to the reader.

Keywords


Mass Media; Religious; Religious Sentiment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Assegaf, J, 1999. Jurnalistik Masa Kini. Jambatan. Bandung.

Badara, A, 2012. Analisis Wacana; Teori, Metode, dan Penerapannyapada Wacana Media.Kencana Prenada, Jakarta

Bugin, B, 2008. Konstruksi Sosial Media Massa. Kencana Prenada Group

Darma, A.Y, 2009. Analisis Wacana Kritis. Yrama Widya, Bandung

Denzin, N &Lincoln S.Y, 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publication Inc, London, New Delhi.

Mulyana, D, & Solatun, 2007. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Rosda Karya, Bandung

Effendy, U.O, 2003. Ilmu, Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi. Citra AdityaBakti, Bandung.

Eriyanto, 2011. Analisis Wacana, Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. LKIS,Yogyakarta

Iskandar, M, & Atmakusumah, 2004. Panduan Jurnalistik Praktis. LembagaPers Dr Soetomo, Jakarta.

Ishwara, L, 2011. Jurnalistik Dasar. Kompas, Jakarta

Komala, L, 2009. Ilmu Komunikasi; Perspektif, Proses, dan Konteks.Widya Padjajaran, Bandung.

Kriyantono, R, 2010. Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Kencana Prenada,Jakarta.

Kusumaningrat, P, & Kusumaningrat, H, 2009. Jurnalistik Teori danPraktek. Rosda Karya,Bandung

Littlejohn, W.S & Foss, A.K, 2011. Teori Komunikasi. Salemba Humanika, Jakarta

McQuail, D, 1991. Teori Komunikasi Massa. Erlangga, Jakarta

Moleong,J.L, 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. RosdaKarya,Bandung

Morrison, Wardhani, C.H., & Hamid, F, 2010. Teori Komunikasi Massa. GhaliaIndonesia, Bogor

Mufid, M, 2009. Etika Filsafat Komunikasi, Kencana Prenada Group, Jakarta

Mulyana, D, 2007. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi; Contoh-contohPenelitian Kualitatif dengan Pendekatan Praktis. Remaja Rosda KaryaBandung.

Mulyana, D, 2008. Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar.RosdaKarya,Bandung

Nurudin, 2007. Pengantar Komunikasi Massa. PT Raja Grafindo Perkasa,Jakarta

Patton, Q.M, 2001. Qualitative Research& Evaluation Methods. Sage Publication

Putra, S.K.D, 2012. Media dan Politik; Menemukan Relasi Antara Dimensi Simbosis-Mutualisme Medan dan Politik, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Robert, M Entman (1993). Framing Toward Clasification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication. 43 (2) 51-58

Reese, D.S & Gandy H.O & Grant, E.A, 2001. Framing Public Life; Perspective in Media and our Understanding of The Social World. Laurence Erlbann Assocciates, Publisher

Pohan, S, 2010. Disertasi. Universiti Sains Malaysia

Rakhmat, J, 2007. Psikologi Komunikasi. PT Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung

Samovar, L.A, Porter, E.R., & McDaniel, R.E, 2010. Komunikasi LintasBudaya. Salemba Humanika, Jakarta

Saverin, J.W., & Foss, A.K, 2008. Teori Komunikasi, Sejarah, Metode, danTerapan didalam Media Massa. Kencana Prenada, Jakarta

Sugiono, 2001. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabet, Bandung

Tamburaka, A, 2012. Agenda Setting Media Massa. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v1i3.29

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 242 times
PDF - 197 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.