Application of Criminal Sanctions Against Actors of Narcotics Crime Category I in the Form of Possession of Marijuana Fields

Suyatin Suyatin, Abustan Abustan

Abstract


This study analyzes the efforts to eradicate narcotics criminals carried out by law enforcement officers against the existence of marijuana fields and the cultivation of cannabis plants in the community. This paper uses normative legal research. The research approach used by the researcher is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The technique used to analyze the data is descriptive qualitative in line with the research method applied by the researcher. Efforts to eradicate narcotics crimes carried out by law enforcement officers are through penal and non-penal channels. The corrective route is understood through the procedures of the criminal justice system, while the non-penal course involves the community. Article 104 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics states that the community has the amplest opportunity to prevent and eradicate abuse and illicit trafficking of narcotics and narcotic precursors. Furthermore, Article 105 says that the community has rights and responsibilities to prevent and eliminate abuse and illegal trafficking of drugs and narcotic precursors.


Keywords


criminal sanction; combat narcotics, crime

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Zuhdi. (2012). Perkembangan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 189–206.

Ashworth, A., & Horder, J. (2013). Principles of criminal law. Oxford University Press.

Brown, D., & Siegel, J. (2016). A Brief Overview Of Relevant Organized Crime Laws. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 23(1).

Daming, S. (2016). Konfigurasi Pertarungan Abolisionisme Versus Retensionisme dalam Diskursus Keberadaan Lembaga Pidana Mati di Tingkat Global dan Nasional. YUSTISI, 3(1), 37.

De Cuellar, J. P. (1995). Reflecting on the Past and Contemplating the Future. Global Governance, 1(2), 149–170.

Fletcher, G. P. (1998). Comparative law as a subversive discipline. Am. J. Comp. L., 46, 683.

Hulsman, L. H. C. (2013). Critical criminology and the concept of crime. Criminological Perspectives: Essential Readings, 311–316.

Supriyanto, E. E., Rachmawati, M., & Nugroho, F. J. (2021). Transformative Policies and Infrastructure Strengthening Towards the Police Era 4 . 0. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13, 231–243.

Surya, H., et.al. (2019). Improving Factors of Divorce Rate in Sabang City. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (3): 104-114.

Tumanggor, F., Muazzul, and Zulyadi, R. (2019). Handling of Narcotics Child Victims in Child Special Coaching Institutions Class I Tanjung Gusta, Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (4): 50-55.

Wardhana, B. S. (2020). Kompleksitas Tugas Kepolisian pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JIK: Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 14(2), 80–88. https://jurnalptik.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/252

Zaini, Z. D. (2011). Implementasi Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif dan Pendekatan Normatif Sosiologis dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. In Pranata Hukum (Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 117–132).

Zulyadi, R. (2020). Obstacle Factors on Evidence System of Urine Test Result on Drugs Cases in National Narcotics Board of North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (2): 1316-1324.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2913

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2 times
PDF - 2 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.