Conditional Criminal Voices against the Defendants of Criminal Acts of Corruption in Principle Perspective Justice and Legal Guarantee

Ferry Ferry, Kiki Kristanto, Achmad Adi Surya G. Silam

Abstract


Corruption crimes that have been occurring widely, not only harm the state's finances, but also have been a violation of the social and economic rights of the community at large, so corruption crimes need to be classified as crimes whose eradication must be carried out extraordinarily. Every person convicted of corruption is sanctioned in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations. One form of sanctions imposed by judges related to corruption cases is the Conditional Criminal verdict, which means that the criminal does not need to live inside the Correctional Institution. The verdict is indeed the power of the judge guaranteed in the Law of Judicial Power as well as related to conditional criminality as stipulated in Article 14a of the Criminal Code, but in the Corruption Crimes Act, there is no mention of criminal threats with conditional criminals. In other similar cases, there is a judge's ruling that does not impose a conditional criminal sentence but provides a prison sentence for the accused of corruption, resulting in inconsistencies in the application of the law by the judge in sending the accused to corruption. Therefore, with a conditional criminal conviction will have implications on the principle of justice and legal certainty for convicted other corruption cases, as well as for the Government and society in general in preventing and eradicating corruption cases.


Keywords


Corruption; criminal code; government; law of judicial power

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adithya, A. (2021). Penerapan Peraturan Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak. Jurnal Kertha Semaya.

Adonara, F. F. (2015). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi Principles of Fredom of Justice in Decidene The Case as a Constitutional Mandate. Jurnal Konstitusi.

Anugrah, R., Desril, R., & Disemadi, H. S. (2020). Pidana Mati Terhadap Kejahatan Narkotika Ditinjau Dari Pasal 28I Ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945. KERTHA WICAKSANA. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.14.2.1922.110-117

Aryanta, E. (2020). Kemandirian Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Kaitannya Dengan Larangan Hakim Memutus Lebih Dari Yang Dimintakan Oleh Para Pihak. Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v18i2.6829

Asimin, Ismi. Alat Bukti Keterangan Terdakwa Dan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya Menurut Pasal 183 Kuhap. (2018). Lex Crimen.

Busthami, D. (2018). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.46.4.2017.336-342

Fahmi, W., Syahbandir, M., & Efendi, E. (2018). Kedudukan Pegawai Negeri Sipil Yang Diberhentikan Secara Tidak Hormat Karena Melakukan Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Jabatan. Syiah Kuala Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v1i1.12293

Faiz, Pan Mohamad, 2009. “Teori Keadilan John Rawls”, dalam Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 6 Nomor 1.

Febriasmoro, Angga. 2011. ”Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Disiplin PNS Berdasarkan PP. No. 30. Tahun 1980 dan PP. No. 53 Tahun 2010 di Pemda Kabupaten Karanganyar Jawa Tengah”, Yogyakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Fitra, Nur. Peranan Hakim Sebagai Penegak Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. (2017). LEX ET SOCIETATIS.

Hafi, F. La, & Budiman, B. (2017). Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi dalam Undang-Undang Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v12i1.1200

Hartini, Sri dan Tedi Sudrajat. 2017. Hukum Kepegawaian di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Haryono, W. S. (2017). Asas Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Pidana Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. IUS CONSTITUTUM Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta.

Kelsen, Hans, 2011. “General Theory of Law and State”, diterjemahkan oleh Rasisul Muttaqien, Bandung, Nusa Media.

Kusuma, D. P. (2020). Wewenang Hakim Menilai Sendiri Kerugian Negara Dalam Mengadili Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurist-Diction. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i6.22961

Lilik Mulyadi. (2010). Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia: Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik, Teknik Membuat, dan Permasalahannya. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Luhukay, T. I. sationo dan R. S. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban hukum pembebasan bersyarat narapidana sebagai upaya dalam pencegahan covid 19. JURNAL META-YURIDIS.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2008. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

Masyhur, Kahar, 2015. “Membina Moral dan Akhlak”, Kalam Mulia, Jakarta.

Mazzarello, P. (2011). Cesare lombroso: An anthropologist between evolution and degeneration. Functional Neurology.

Muhtarom, M. (2008). Perkembangan Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia Di Era Reformasi. Ishraqi, IV(2), 145–159.

Nasution, K. (2019). Penggunaan Keterangan Perusahaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i2.2407

Nelwan, A. (2021). Implementasi Hukuman Disiplin Jam Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil pada Badan Kepegawaian dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Kota Tomohon. Jurnal Kajian Kebijakan Dan Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JURNAL ADMINISTRO). https://doi.org/10.36412/jan.v2i2.2517

Oeliga, C., & Afita, Y. (2017). Penyalahgunaan Aset Negara Terhadap Pejabat Secara Pribadi Di Luar Fungsi Kedinasan Dan Jabatan. Rio Law Jurnal. https://doi.org/10.36355/rlj.v1i2.406

Parningotan Malau, J., & Sesung, R. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Penerima Titipan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Setelah Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Dibatalkan Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3176 K/Pdt/2013). Jurnal Jatiswara. https://doi.org/10.29303/jatiswara.v33i2.173

Soemardi, 2010. Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif-empirik, Bee Media Indonesia, Bandung.

Taqiuddin, H. U. (2017). Penalaran Hukum (Legal Reasoning) Dalam Putusan Hakim. JISIP.

Zulyadi, R. (2020). Judge's Role in Court to Eradicate Corruption According to Law Number 20 in 2001 (Study of Decision 16/PID.SUS.K/2011/PN.MDN). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 1280-1288.

Laws and Regulations

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Criminal Code

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code

Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power

Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus

Government Regulation Number 53 of 2010 concerning Discipline of Civil Servants




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2962

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 1 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.