Legal Protection of Third Parties as Fiduciary Guarantee Holders against Assets Designated as Bankruptcy Boedel by the Curator (Case Study Decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-Other-Lain/2019/PN.Niaga Medan jo. No.7/Pdt.Sus- PKPU/2018/PN.Niaga Medan)

Sahnaz Kartika, Sunarmi Sunarmi, Hasim Purba, Dedi Harianto

Abstract


This study is an analytical descriptive study of normative juridical law. Constitutional, conceptual and cases based approach is used for this research. The data comes from secondary data resources. The location of this research is on Medan District Court Class I A, particulary by interviewing commercial judge and the curator. The data collection techniques and tools are library research, field research, document studies and interview. The data qualitatively analyzed.The results of the study indicate that the third party’s lawsuit against the property that is designated as boedel bankrupt by the curator in the decision number: 2/Pdt.Sus-Another-Lawsuit/2019/PN.Niaga jo. Verdict Number: 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018/PN. Niaga Mdn is not the asset of the bankrupt debtor. To determine the status of third party callateral objects in bankruptcy, it refers to the provisions of Article 21 of Law Number 37 of 2004. The phrase in this law is associated with Article 1131 of the Civil Code means all the debtor’s property, both movable and immovable, both existing and new in the future. The decision of the Panel of Judges in deciding this case, has provided legal protection to third parties as holders of fiduciary guarantees in bankruptcy in a preventive manner, namely the curator in carrying out his duties must apply the precautionary principle before determining the existence of assets by taking nto account the basis of the rights used as olleteral so that it can provide legal certainty. Meanwhile, repressively, by filing another lawsuit against the curator’s actions that include fiduciary guarantees in the bankruptcy filing.


Keywords


insolvency; third parties; fiduciary

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adinata, I Made Teguh, Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis Terhadap Hak Jaminan Yang Diagunkan Oleh Debitor Pailit, Karya Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Aji, Petra Kusuma. (2021). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Benda Yang Dijaminkan, https://pn-lembata.go.id/page/content/588/akibat-hukum perjanjian-jaminan-fidusia-terhadap-benda-yang-dijaminkan, diakses pada tanggal 27 Juni.

Al Mufti, Moch Zulkaranain. (2016). Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Penjualan Harta Pailit di BawahHarga Pasar, Lex Renaissance No. 1 Vol. 1 Januari.

Ali, Zainuddin. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Anggun, Windy Permata, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Fidusia Atas Jaminan Berupa Piutang Berdasarkan Surat Daftar Piutang Yang Dibuat Oleh Pemberi Fidusia (Studi Terhadap Pasal 9 Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia), Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.

Ansari, T. (2019)Reminding State Owned Enterprises (BUMN) Management Using the Principle of ’Business Judgment Rule’: A Preliminary Note. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 27-38

Aprilianti. (2010). “Fungsi Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Menurut UU No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia”, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Hukum Volume 4 No. 3 September-Desember.

Ashofa, Burhan. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun. (2016). Sistem Penemuan Hukum Dalam Masyarakat Prismatik, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Bahsan, M. (2007). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dworkin, Ronald dalam Bismar Nasution. (2003). “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Perbandingan Hukum”, Makalah, disampaikan pada Dialog Interaktif Tentang Penelitian Hukum dan Hasil Penulisan Hukum pada Majalah Akreditasi, Fakultas Hukum USU, Tanggal 18 Februari.

Ediwarman.(2016)Monografi Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Hasbullah, Frieda Husni.(2002). Hukum Kebendaan Perdata: Hak-hak yang memberi Jaminan, Jilid 2, Jakarta: Ind-Hill-Co.

https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/44860a509202dc87c53b265163900b9a.html, diakses pada tanggal 02 Juli 29021.

Ibrahim, Jhony. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Surabaya: Bayumedia.

Kadir, Muhammad Abdul. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Lubis, M. Solly. (1994). Filsafat Ilmu dan Penelitian, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2010). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (1987). Penemuan Hukum, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

, (2010) Mengenal Hukum, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2004).Meodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor PM 39 Tahun 2017 Tetang Pendaftaran dan Kebangsaan Kapal.

Porta, Rafael La, Investor Protection and Cororate Convernance, Jurnal of Financial Economics No. 58, Oktober 1999.

Raharjo, Handri. (2009). Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. (1980). Permasalahan Hukum di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni.

Rambe, Ropaun. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Lengkap, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Cet. 7.

Ruslan, Rosady. (2003). Metode Penelitian Public Relation dan Komunikasi, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (1984). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press.

Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. (1994). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurumetri, Jilid 2, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Susanti, Retnowula and Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. (1997). Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Maju Mundur.

Sutarno. (2003). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perkreditan Pada Bank, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suratman. (2018). Hak Melaksanakan Eksekusi Barang Jaminan Kebendaan Pasca Putusan Pailit, Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Volume 2 Nomor 1, Februari.

Syamsuddin, Sulaiman, et al. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Harta Pailit, Journal of Lex Generalis Volume 2, Nomor 3, Maret.

Syahrani, Riduan. (1999).Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Usman, Rachmadi. (2008).Hukum Jamian Keperdataan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.

Undang-Undang N omor 37 Tahun 2004 tentag Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Witanto, D.Y. (2015). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Aspek Perikatan, Pendaftaran, dan Eksekusi), Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Yani, Ahmad dan Gunawan Widjaja. (2002). Seri Hukum Bisnis: Kepailitan, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Wawancara dengan Hakim Pengadilan Niaga Negeri Medan Kelas I A Khusus yaitu Bapak Dominggus Silanban, S.H., MH., pada tanggal 09 Juli 2021.

Wawancara dengan Kurator Dr. Deni Purba, SH, LL.M, MCIArb., pada tanggal 21 Juni 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.3292

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 45 times
PDF - 37 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.