_.gif)
_.gif)
Examining the Legitimacy of the Myanmar Military Coup in the Eye of International Law: After the 2020 Elections
Abstract
The forced takeover of a country's government is also known as a coup (Coup d’état), the coup has become a polemic on its legitimacy in international law, such as the coup incident in Myanmar after the 2020 elections carried out by the highest military power holder or the head of the Myanmar military junta. The regulation regarding the coup d’état in the eyes of international law must be studied properly and correctly. The existence of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of the State equips international countries so that coups are not carried out arbitrarily, resulting in violations of the rules of international law. Looking at the Myanmar military coup from the concept of international recognition of the government of a country, then from the concept of international recognition of the succession of the Myanmar government. Then how is the concept of international recognition of the government that can be obtained or comes from the coup d'etat. And about how the legitimacy of the coup as a form of transition of government in the perspective of International Law. So that it becomes clear about the Myanmar military coup action which is right if it does not violate the rules of international law and becomes wrong if it violates the rules of international law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika. (Buku)
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika. (hal.11)
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika. (hal.7)
Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Piagam Perhimpunan Bangsa-Bangsa Asia Tengg https://www.asean.org/wpcontent/uplads/images/archive/ACIndonesiapdf diunduh pada 18 juli 2021
Boer Mauna, Idem, Hlm. 74
Boer, M. (2001). Hukum Internasional Pengertian peranan dan fungsi dalam era dinamika global. Jakarta: PT Alumni.
Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie's principles of public international law. Oxford University Press, USA. Hal. 93. Egawati, N. (2013). Penerapan Pasal 1 Konvensi Montevideo, 1933, Terhadap Pengakuan Atas Negara Palestina: Tinjauan Menurut Hukum Internasional (doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Airlangga)
Gunawan, I. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, hal. 2, 3.
Firnas, M. A. (2003). Prospek Demokrasi di Myanmar. Jurnal Universitas Paramadina 2 (2), 128.141.
Higgott, R. (1997). De facto and de jure regionalism: the double discourse of regionalism in the Asia Pacific. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations, 11(2), 165-183.
Hom, N. M. K. (2000). "Revolutionary legality": the coup d'Etat of 1962 and the Burmese military regime. Southern Cross University Law Review, (4), 60-106.
https://news.detik.com/internasional/ d-5356247/umumkan-keadaan-darurat-militer myanmarambil-alih-kekuasaan-1-tahun di unduh pada 16 juli 2021.
https://www- britannicacom.translate.goog/topic/international-law/States-in international-law Di unduh pada juni 2021
https://www.dw.com/id/pengawas-independen-tak-ada-bukti-kecurangan-pemil myanmar/a-57567052 di unduh pada 18 juni 2021. https://kbbi.web.id/kudeta di unduh pada 15 juni 2021.
Huala Adolf, (2002), Aspek-aspek Negara dalam Hukum Internasional, edisi revisi, (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, hal. 69)
Iqbal, Muhamad, Firdaus. 2021, Kudeta Militer Myanmar Dalam Perspektif HukumInternasional, Jurnal Dialektika Hukum Vol. 3 No.1.
Irfan, B. H., Warsono, P., & Palupi, D. A. (2013). Kajian Juridis Pasal 3 Konvensi Jenew 1949 Tentang Konflik Bersenjata Non-Internasional Dalam Hal Perlindungan Penduduk Sipil Pada Pergolakan Di Suriah Ditinjau Dari Segi Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Law, Bung Hatta University, 1(2).
Iskandar, P. (2018). Non-citizen rights in ASEAN: The need to chart a newcourse. Social & Legal Studies, 27(2), 180-199
Jawahir Thontowi dan Pranoto Iskandar, Op., Cit. Hlm. 139
Jefferson, T. (1895). The Writings of Thomas Jefferson: 1792-1794 (Vol. 6). GP Putnam's Sons.
Lauterpacht, H. (2012). Recognition in international law (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.
Lauterpacht, 1948, Recognition in International Law, hal 28
Libella Elsa, (2020), Pengakuan Dalam Pembentukan Negara Ditinjau Dari Segi Hukum Internasional. JJR 22, 165-17.
Mulyana, B. (2017). Materi 8- Pengakuan.
Parthiana, I. W. (1990). Pengantar Hukum International. Pujilestar, Yulita, 2018, Peranan Pengakuan dalam Hukum Internasional: Teori Lahirnya Suatu Negara dan Ruang Lingkup Pengakuan, Jurnal Pendidikan KewarganegaraanVol. 5 No. 2.
Rahardjo, M. (2010). Triangulasi dalam penelitian kualitatif.
Ribbelink, O. (1999). State Succession and the Recognition of States and Governments.Pilot Project of the Council of Europe
Shah, M. et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 276-286.
Siregar, N. (2018). Suksesi Negara dalam Hukum Internasional.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjaua Singkat, cet.16. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Starke, J. G. (1936). Monism and dualism in the theory of international law. Brit. YB Int'l L., 17, 66.
Sujadmiko, B. (2012). Pengakuan Negara Baru Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Internasional (Studi terhadap kemerdekaan Kosovo). Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1).Taylor, n 40 above, at 294.
United Nations. General Assembly. (1949). Universal declaration of human rights (Vol.3381). Department of State, United States of America.
Widagdo, S., Wahyudi, S., Setyorini, Y., & Basuki, I. (2008). Masalah-Masalah Hukum Internasional Publik, Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3596
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 290 timesPDF - 126 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.