Application of the Load of Proof in Customs Value Disputes Reviewing From Customs Law and Tax Law (Analysis Of The Decision Of The Supreme Court Number 1965/B/PK/PJK/2018)

Ardiansyah Ardiansyah

Abstract


In clarifying the burden of proof of customs value disputes, there is a Supreme Court Decision ruling that documents and evidence that were not submitted by the importer at the objection stage and cannot be validated and show no good faith and cannot be believed to be true by the Supreme Court of Justice. The research was conducted on the application of the burden of proof in the Supreme Court's decision related to customs and taxation law. The study concludes that the Supreme Court's decision is in line with the norms of proof of transaction value both in national law and in WTO/GATT provisions as well as tax law. The importer is obliged to submit data and supporting evidence of the transaction value to customs. And the consequence if the request is not fulfilled is the determination of the customs value by the customs official.


Keywords


Customs value; evicence; tax court; dispute

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ardiansyah., & Suganda, A. (2020). Burden of Proof of Customs Valuation Disputes in Indonesian Tax Court. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 5 (20), 100-111.

De Wulf, Luc., and Sokol, Jose B. (2005). Customs Modernization Handbook, Washington, D.C: The World Bank

Dwi handoko. (2017).Asas-asas Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Penitensier di Indonesia.

Gerard Meussen. (2011).The Burden of Proof in Tax Law (The final reports of the annual meeting ofEuropean Association of Tax Law Professors (EATLP) held in Uppsala, Sweden from 2-3 June)

Mahdi Syahbandir. (2005). Eksistensi Pengadilan Pajak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Negara Hukum. Disertasi Program Doktoral Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjajaran. Bandung.

Muhjad Hadin. (2012). Penelitian Hukum Indonesia Kontemporer, (Yoyakarta: Genta Publishing.)

R. Soeroso. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika)

Rahmat Trijono. (2013). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Pengetahuan Perundangan-undangan. (Jakarta: Penerbit Papas Sinar Sinanti)

Rochmat Soemitro. (1990). Asas dan Dasar Perpajakan, Eresco, Bandung.

Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo).

Zainuddin Ali. (2011) Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Penerbit Sinar Grafika) Cet.3




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3708

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 98 times
PDF - 36 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.