_.gif)
_.gif)
Understanding Indonesian E-Law and Democracy: Challenge, and Hope
Abstract
This study aimed to discuss how law firms quickly provide advice to citizens who need legal assistance in the digital era with the help of technology, smartphones, laptops, and computers to get justice and democracy in Indonesia. We need the data we get electronically on many complications such as journal proceedings, books, and other materials that discuss the world's understanding and development of democracy. The data we found electronically were then analyzed to understand involving a high level of evaluation and coding system to answer this research question with high principles of validity and reliability. We took several well-known publications such as application, Taylor and Francis, Google books, and some academic materials that we received technological assistance. After getting an understanding and discussion, we can briefly convey this finding, and the development of Indonesian democracy is a very significant breakthrough in an era where everyone has been able to reach information instantly through their technology with the hope that this finding will be a new solution and input for studies on the development and journey of democracy in the digital era.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
All, O.B.O., Situated, O.S., Edutrek, L., Complaint, C.A., 2014. Law Offices Of Todd M. Friedman, PC.
Barton, B.H., 2014. A glass half full look at the changes in the American legal market. International Review of Law and Economics 38, 29–42.
Benvenisti, E., 2018. Upholding Democracy Amid the Challenges of New Technology: What Role for the Law of Global Governance? European Journal of International Law 29, 9–82.
Criado, J.I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., Gil-Garcia, J.R., 2013. Government innovation through social media.
Cropf, R., 2018. The Challenges in Implementing E-Democracy in the United States, in: User Centric E-Government. Springer, pp. 3–22.
Crouch, M., 2013. Law and Religion in Indonesia: Conflict and the courts in West Java. Routledge.
Cunningham, J.A., Menter, M., Young, C., 2017. A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer 42, 923–956.
Dinovitzer, R., Gunz, H.P., Gunz, S.P., 2014. Reconsidering lawyer autonomy: The nexus between firm, lawyer, and client in large commercial practice. American Business Law Journal 51, 661–719.
Edwards, M., Rashid, A., Rayson, P., 2015. A systematic survey of online data mining technology intended for law enforcement. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 48, 1–54.
Fenwick, M., Vermeulen, E.P., 2019. The Lawyer of the Future as “Transaction Engineer”: Digital Technologies and the Disruption of the Legal Profession, in: Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain. Springer, pp. 253–272.
Foster, A., 2012. Let’s integrate–information services, content, technologies and collaboration: The Business Information Survey 2012. Business information review 29, 9–28.
Glavinic, T., 2012. Watergate and the" Washington Post:" Questionable Tactics in Service to Democracy. Inquiries Journal 4.
Goodenough, O., Lauritsen, M., 2012. Educating the Digital Lawyer. LexisNexis.
Granat, R., Kimbro, S., 2017. The future of virtual law practice. Haskins, P. The Relevant Lawyer Re-imaging the Future of the Legal Profession. Chicago, ABA Standing Committee on Professionalism Center for Professional Responsibility.
Ha-Redeye, O., 2013. Virtual Offices Provide Promising Opportunities. Ontario Bar Association TECHxpo (2013).
Hildebrandt, M., Koops, B.-J., 2010. The challenges of ambient law and legal protection in the profiling era. The Modern Law Review 73, 428–460.
Horowitz, D.L., 2013. Constitutional change and democracy in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
Hussain, W.M.H.W., Zainol, Z.A., Yaakub, N.I., 2010. Internet legal service marketing: are Malaysian lawyers getting left behind? International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry 3, 155–164.
Keene, D.L., Handrich, R.R., 2013. Values, priorities, and decision-making: Intergenerational law offices, intergenerational juries. Jury Expert 25, 23.
Kharlie, A.T., Helmi, M.I., 2019. The Role of the law on electronic information and transactions in overcoming challenges of democracy in Indonesia.
Kimbro, S.L., 2010. Practicing law without an office address: How the bona fide office requirement affects virtual law practice. U. Dayton L. Rev. 36, 1.
Klinkner, B., 2017. Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Law Offices Expected to Be Top Technological Trends Impacting the Legal Profession in 2017. The Wyoming Lawyer, February.
Leeuw, F.L., Schmeets, H., 2016. Empirical legal research: A guidance book for lawyers, legislators and regulators. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Liang, S., Mele, J., Wu, Y., Buffenstein, R., Hornsby, P.J., 2010. Resistance to experimental tumorigenesis in cells of a long-lived mammal, the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Aging cell 9, 626–635.
Lintang, L.C., Martufi, A., Ouwerker, J.W., 2020. The Alternative Concepts of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia: Legal Comparison with Ireland and Canada. BESTUUR 9, 13–25.
Margolis, M., Moreno-Riaño, G., 2016. The prospect of internet democracy. Routledge.
Moore, T.J., Stohlmann, M.S., Wang, H.H., Tank, K.M., Glancy, A.W., Roehrig, G.H., 2014. Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education, in: Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices. Purdue University Press, pp. 35–60.
Musofiana, I., 2021. Legal Protection For Victims Of Cybercrime In The Digital Era In Strengthening Cyber Democracy In Indonesia Post 2019 General Election, in: The 2nd International Conference And Call Paper.
Noveck, B.S., 2017. Five hacks for digital democracy. Nature News 544, 287.
Pambudi, A., Yitawati, K., 2021. Dinamika dan Tantangan Cyber Law di Indonesia, in: Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies.
Parthasarathy, S., 2020. Approaching intellectual property scholarship differently: A qualitative research review and agenda. Science and Public Policy 47, 627–637.
Pender, J.P., Jha, G., Youn, D.H., Ziegler, J.M., Andoni, I., Choi, E.J., Heller, A., Dunn, B.S., Weiss, P.S., Penner, R.M., Mullins, C.B., 2020. Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 14, 1243–1295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b04365
Prasetyo, T., Karo, R.P.K., Pricilia, V., Setiadinata, N., 2019. The Urgency of Law Establishment Regarding Block-Chain Technology in Indonesia Based on the Perspective of Dignified Justice (Keadilan Bermartabat). UNIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, 177–198.
Putra, D., 2020. A modern judicial system in Indonesia: legal breakthrough of e-court and e-legal proceeding. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, 275–297.
Regan Jr, M.C., Heenan, P.T., 2009. Supply chains and porous boundaries: the disaggregation of legal services. Fordham L. Rev. 78, 2137.
Reid, M., 2018. A Call to Arms: Why and How Lawyers and Law Schools Should Embrace Artificial Intelligence. U. Tol. L. Rev. 50, 477.
Richards, N., Hartzog, W., 2018. The Pathologies of Digital Consent. Wash. UL Rev. 96, 1461.
Samborn, H.V., 2011. Virtual Law Offices Are Blooming Everywhere. Perspectives 20, 10.
Setyaningrum. E. et al. (2021). Community Economic Innovation in Mangrove Area at East Beach of Java Island. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 3968-3975
Shah, M. M., et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 3, No 1, Page: 276-286.
Shirazi, A., Behzadan, A.H., 2015. Design and assessment of a mobile augmented reality-based information delivery tool for construction and civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 141, 04014012.
Silva, P.C., Batista, P.V., Lima, H.S., Alves, M.A., Guimarães, F.G., Silva, R.C., 2020. COVID-ABS: An agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 139, 110088.
Spirakis, G., Spiraki, C., Nikolopoulos, K., 2010. The impact of electronic government on democracy: e-democracy through e-participation. Electronic Government, an International Journal 7, 75–88.
Street, L.A., Hansen, D.R., 2019. Who Owns the Law: Why We Must Restore Public Ownership of Legal Publishing. J. Intell. Prop. L. 26, 205.
Stuckey, K.D., Ellis, R.L., 2021. Internet and online law. Law Journal Press.
Sturm, M., 2019. Konzepte und Modelle zur wertschätzenden Begleitung mehrsprachiger Kinder im Rahmen der Kindergarten-und Vorschulpädagogik: Das internationale Forschungsprojekt KINDINMI. R&E-SOURCE.
Subagyo, A., 2020. Implementasi Pancasila Dalam Menangkal Intoleransi, Radikalisme Dan Terorisme. Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 6, 10–24.
Syarif, N., 2019. Sharia and Democracy: Efforts to Synergize the Demands of Faith with the legal System in Indonesia.
Terry, L.S., 2013. Trends in global and Canadian lawyer regulation. Sask. L. Rev. 76, 145.
Tushnet, R., 2014. ‘I’ma lawyer, not an ethnographer, Jim’: Textual Poachers and Fair Use. The Journal of Fandom Studies 2, 21–30.
Wassom, B., 2014. Augmented reality law, privacy, and ethics: Law, society, and emerging AR technologies. Syngress.
Winters, J.A., 2014. Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia, in: Beyond Oligarchy. Cornell University Press, pp. 11–34.
Xie, J., Tang, H., Huang, T., Yu, F.R., Xie, R., Liu, J., Liu, Y., 2019. A survey of blockchain technology applied to smart cities: Research issues and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 21, 2794–2830.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4114
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 70 timesPDF - 37 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.