Developing Item Analysis of Teacher–Made Test for Summative Assessment of Seventh Grade of SMPN 8 Komodo in Academic Year 2020/2021

Aloysia Moto, Lailatul Musyarofah, Kani Sulam Taufik

Abstract


It was the goal of this study to improve the analysis of teacher-made English test items and to evaluate their quality. The researchers used the Research & Development (R&D) procedure to adapt the ADDIE model. @Aloytemsis, the development's product, became the answer as a result of a needs assessment. At SMPN 8 Komodo, the validity, reliability, index difficulty, and discriminating power of the summative test items were all graded. 43 students who had to take the summative test participated in the field testing. In case of validity, it indicated that 15 items (37.5%) were classified into ‘invalid’ due to the validity index were < 0.279. Meanwhile, 25 items (62.5%) were classified into ‘valid’ criteria regarding the value of validity index were > 0.279. Then, the items under consideration received a reliability index of 0.762. In other words, the “teacher-made English summative test items” were deemed “Good Reliable”. It was discovered that the tough category contained 22 items (55%), the medium category contained 18 items (45%), and the easy category contained just 0 items (0%). Lastly, it is found that the items test were 13 items (32.5%) were in the category ‘Poor’ items due to its value of discrimination index 0.00-0.19. Then, in the category ‘Enough’, there were 12 items (30%). On the other hand, there were 15 items (37.5%) were classified into ‘Good’ items. Unfortunately, there was no items into category ‘Very Good’ items.


Keywords


item analysis; teacher-made test; summative assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amari. (1997). Penilaian Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar Siswa di Sekolah.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2003). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ayuningsih, W. et al. (2020). Implementation of Islamic Education Curriculum Development in Al-Ulum Islamic School Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal. P. 1033-1044.

Beacham, Lyle F. (1990). Fundamental Consideration in Language Testing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bichi, A. A. (2015). Item Analysis using a Derived Science Achievement Test Data. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) Volume 4 Issue 5, May 2015, 1655-1662.

Bloom, S. Benyamin. George Madaus F. Thomas Hasting J. (1971). Evaluation to Improve Learning. New York: cc.

Brown, H.D. (2003). Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practices. California: Longman.

Fatimah, S., Elzamzami, A. B., & Slamet, J. (2020). Item Analysis of Final Test for the 9th Grade Students of SMPN 44 Surabaya in the Academic Year of 2019/2020. JournEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature), 2(1), 34-46.

Fraenkel, R. Jack and Norman. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Singapore. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Heaton, J.B. (1975). Writing English Language Test. New York: Longman.

Heaton, J.B. (1990). Classroom Testing, New York: Longman Inc.,

Heaton, J.B. (1998). Writing English Language test. London and New York: Longman.

Hughes, Arthur. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, David W. and Johnson, Roger T. (2002). Meaningful Assessment. A Manageable and Cooperative Process. USA: Allyn and Bacon.

Kemdikbud, (2017). Panduan Pembelajaran Untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama /Madrasah Tsanawiyah (Smp/Mts). Jakarta,

Keputusan Kepala Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Nomor 018/H/Kr/2020 Tentang Kompetensi Inti Dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran Pada Kurikulum 2013 Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Pendidikan Menengah Berbentuk Sekolah Menengah Atas Untuk Kondisi Khusus, 2021

Nurgiyantoro, Burman. (1995). Penelitian Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Sabat, Y., & Slamet, J. (2019). Students’ Perception towards Written Feedback of Thesis Writing Advisory at STKIP Sidoarjo. JET ADI BUANA, 4(1), 63-79.

Slamet, J., & Sulistyaningsih, S. (2021). Students’ Difficulties in Answering “Structure and Written Expression” TOEFL-like at STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo. E-Structural (English Studies on Translation, Culture, Literature, and Linguistics), 4(01), 17-27.

Slamet, J., Sabat, Y., & Prasetyo, Y. (2019). Students’ Perceptions Toward Lecturers’ Written Feedback Of Thesis Writing Advisory On The 7th Semester Students At STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo (Doctoral Dissertation, Stkip Pgri Sidoarjo).

Weir, Cyrill. (1993). Understanding and Developing Language Tests. UK: Prentice-Hall International Ltd.

Widodo, J. P., & Slamet, J. (2021, December). Lecturers’ Perspectives Through E-learning by Using Moodle for Post-Graduate Students at STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo. In International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture (ISoLEC 2021) (pp. 167-171). Atlantis Press.

Widodo, J. P., & Slamet, J. (2020). Students’perception Towards Google Classroom As E-Learning Tool (A Case Study of Master of English Education of the Second Semester at STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo). Magister Scientiae, 2(48), 99-109.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4237

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 63 times
PDF - 93 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.