_.gif)
_.gif)
The Analysis of Trade Circumvention, Threats and Risk to the Duties and Functions of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DJBC) Indonesia
Abstract
One of the threats from international trade is trade circumvention (TC) schemes with the aim of avoiding antidumping rules or restrictions on the number of incoming goods (quotas). This paper tries to explore the phenomenon of TC in Indonesia through a qualitative approach. Using the literature study method by studying the literature and related documents, this paper analyzes the threats and risks of TC to Indonesia from the perspective of law enforcement intelligence. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia's main threat is being dragged into a situation as a third country or destination country in the TC cycle. The risks faced are not only detrimental from an economic perspective related to trade and state revenues, but also Indonesia's bilateral relations with other countries. Meanwhile, in terms of law enforcement intelligence, prevention of TC in Indonesia requires appropriate laws or regulations to make it easier for relevant agencies or institutions to take action against TC practices. Data integration between related agencies or institutions is also very decisive in preventing TC practices in the future.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alhayat, A. P. (2017). Ketidakefektifan Kebijakan Anti-Dumping Produk Impor Baja Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Awal. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, VOL.11 NO.2, DESEMBER.
Alhayat, A. P., Muslim, A., Sari, N. B., & Wulandari, A. (2016). Kajian Potensi Kerugian Indonesia dalam Praktek Circumvention oleh Negara Mitra Dagang. Jakarta: Puska Daglu, BPPP, Kementerian Perdagangan.
Carter, D. L. (2005). Brief History Of Law Enforcement Intelligence: Past Practice And Recommendations For Change. Trends in Organized Crime, Vol. 8, No. 3,.
Carter, D. L., & Carter, J. G. (2009). The Intelligence Fusion Process for State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 36(12), 1323-1339.
Detik.com. (2013, Juni 13). UE Bebaskan 3 Perusahaan Sepeda Indonesia dari Tuduhan Circumvention. Diambil kembali dari news.detik.com: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-2272248/ue-bebaskan-3-perusahaan-sepeda-indonesia-dari-tuduhan-circumvention
Dione, S., and Togola, B. (2018). Historicizing Ethno-Religious and Political Conflicts in West Africa: The Malian Case. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol I (4): 1-15.
DJBC. (2021). Graph Analytics untuk Mendeteksi Trade Circumvention di Indonesia 2021. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai: Direktorat Informasi Kepabeanan dan Cukai.
Kholfi, Y., & Primadista, T. (2021, April 1). Why we should fight trade circumvention. Diambil kembali dari www.thejakartapost.com: https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2021/04/01/why-we-should-fight-trade-circumvention.html
Liu, X., & Shi, H. (2018). Anti‐dumping duty circumvention through trade rerouting: Evidence from Chinese exporters. World Econonomics, DOI: 10.1111/twec.12747.
Munawir, S. Z., and Hasibuan, A.L. (2020). Awareness of Medan Area Students in Demanding Against the Law of Drug Abuse, the Prevention of Radicalism and Terrorism. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (2): 1239-1250.
Priadi, R., Kholil, S., and Zulkarnain, I. (2018). ISIS Terror on detik.com Online Media in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume I, No 3, October 2018, Page: 451-464.
Prunckun, H. (2010). Handbook of Scientific Methods of Inquiry for Intelligence Analysis. Toronto: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Puccio, L., & Erbahar, A. (2016). Circumvention of Anti-dumping: A Law and Economics Analysis of Proportionality in EU Rules. Journal of World Trade, Vol 50 (3), pp. 391–416.
Septyaningsih, I. (2020, Agustus 26). India Bebaskan Produk Panel Surya RI dari Safeguard Duty. Diambil kembali dari republika.co.id: https://republika.co.id/berita/qfo2zq383/india-bebaskan-produk-panel-surya-ri-dari-emsafeguard-dutyem
Sundseth, M., Hines, J. D., & Swinker, M. E. (1999). Understanding global trade: An instructional tool. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 4; ProQuest Professional Education, pg 49.
Vermulst, E. (2012). EU Anti-Circumvention Rules & Practice. Bangkok: Seminar on Trade Defense Measures.
WTO. (2015). Statistics on Anti-dumping. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm: World Trade Organization.
Yu, S. Y. (2007). Circumvention and Anti-circumvention in Anti-dumping Practice: A New Problem in China’s Outbound Trade. Journal of World Trade, 1015–1041, at 1021–1022.
Yu, Y. (2008). Circumvention and Anti-Circumvention Measures: The Impact on Anti-Dumping Practice in International Trade. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
Zhou, W. (2016). Circumvention and Anti-Circumvention: Rising Protectionism in Australia. World Trade Review, 15: 3, 495–522. doi:10.1017/S1474745615000762.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4277
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 62 timesPDF - 68 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.