_.gif)
_.gif)
The Battle of Surabaya November 1945 in Humaniter Law Perspective
Abstract
The Battle of Surabaya in November 1945 which lasted for 3 weeks was the most intense battle during the Revolutionary Independence of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 – 1949. The Battle of Surabaya those involved from the Indonesian side are regular soldiers and fighters consisting of volunteers or militias who are members of several groups of fighters. These fighters considered that the arrival of British troops accompanied by the Netherland Indies Civil Administration/NICA army as an effort to take the Independence of the Republic of Indonesia which had been proclaimed on August 17, 1945. Therefore, They needed to defend Surabaya from the occupation by the Dutch and The Battle of Surabaya became an inspiration for all Indonesian people to maintain Indonesian independence. This paper will discuss how the distinction principles that distinguish between combatants and non-combatants and the concept of direct participation in the Battle of Surabaya in November 1945 and discuss whether the spontaneity of the people of Surabaya as levée en masse.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdurakhman, et al. n.d. Pertempuran 10 November 1945. Jakarta:, Direktorat Kepahlawanan, Keperintisan dan Kesetiakawanan Sosial, Direktorat Jenderal Pemberdayaan Sosial dan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from https://direktoratk2krs. kemsos.go.id/admin-pc/assets/doc/ebook/file-Pertempuran-10-November.pdf , diakses pada tanggal 2 April 2022.
Adryamarthanino, Verelladevank. (2021). "Apa Perbedaan antara Pengakuan De Facto dan De Jure?". Retrieved from : https://www.kompas.com/stori/read/ 2021/12/14/100000279/apa-perbedaan-antara-pengakuan-de-facto-dan-de-jure-?page=all. , diakses pada 3 April 2022.
Ambarwati et at.(2009). Hukum Humaniter Internasional, Dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional. , Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bakry, Suryadi, Umar, (2019), Hukum Humaniter Internasional Sebuah Pengantar, Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.
Clauesewitz, Von, Carl edited and translated by Howard and Paret. (1984). On War, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Crawford, Emily. (2011). Levée En Masse – A Nineteenth Century Concept in a Twenty-First Century World. Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11/31. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=1851947 , diakses pada tanggal 9 April 2022.
Danial. (2016). Efektifitas Konsep Prinsip Pembedaan Hukum Humaniter Internasional Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Korban dalam Konflik Bersenjata Modern. Jurnal Media Hukum Volume 23 NO.2 / Desember 2016. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/114186-ID-revitalisasi-prinsip-pembedaan-distincti.pdf diakses pada 9 April 2022.
Hamidi, Jazim. (2006). Makna dan Kedudukan Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia (The Meaning and Legal Status of Proclamation Text in the Republic of Indonesia’s Constitutional System). Risalah Hukum Fakultas Hukum Unmul Desember 2006. Retrieved from file:///D:/Users/User/Downloads/129-Article%20Text-415-1-10-20200103. pdf , diakses pada 3 April 2022.
Haryomataram, (2005), Pengantar Hukum Humaniter, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hutagalung, R, Batara. (2018). 10 November’ 45 Mengapa Inggris Membom Surabaya?. Jakarta: Penerbit Indocamp.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar, (2002) Konvensi-Konvensi Palang Merah 1949, Bandung: Penerbit PT. Alumni.
Matanasi, Petrick. Inggris Ngamuk dan Republik Remuk dalam Pertempuran Surabaya. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/b3Gu , diakses pada 8 April 2022.
Melzer, Nils. (2009). Pedoman Penafsiran tentang Konsep Keikutsertaa Langsung dalam Permusuhan menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Jakarta: Delegasi Regional ICRC untuk Indonesia dan Timor Leste.
Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940
Ricklefs, M,C (2007). Sejarah Indonesia Modern 1200 – 2004. Penerjemah Satrio Wahono, et al. Jakarta: PT Serambi Ilmu Semesta.
Silas, John dkk (2018), Pasak Sejarah Indonesia Kekinian Surabaya 1945, Surabaya; Bagian Humas Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Retrieved from https://repository.unair.ac.id/93710/2/23%20Pasar%20Sejarah%20Fulltext.pdf , diakses pada tanggal 2 April 2022.
Suryokusumo, Sumaryo. (2007). Studi Kasus hukum internasional. Jakarta: Tatanusa.
Suryana. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Model Praktis Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif, Buku Ajara Perkuliahan Univeritas Indonesia, Retrieved from https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_penelitian_1_dir/23731890cdc8189968cf15105c651573.pdf , diakses pada 3 April 2022.
Wattimena, A.A, Reza, (2018). Bisakah Perang Dihindari? Sejarah, Anatomi dan Kemungkinan Perang di Abad 21. Diterbitkan dalam Ary Suta Center Series For Strategic Management Oktober 2018 Volume 43.
Zed, Mestika. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4688
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 53 timesPDF - 73 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.