Juridical Analysis of Judge's Decision in Criminal Case of Law with Threats of Violence Performed by Adults towards Adult Victims (Study of Decision No. 769/PID.B/2021/PN Rantauprapat)

Abstract

Obscenity is known as an act that leads to harassing a woman in public asdone to achieve self-satisfaction outside the bondmarriageso that it violates the rules of decency, obscene acts are subject to Article 290 of the Criminal Code which is punishable by a maximum imprisonment of 7 years.is any act of abuse of physical force with or without the use of means that is against the law and poses a danger to the body, life, and independence of people. The formulation of the problem in this matter is 1.What are the legal regulations regarding obscene acts with legally adult victims? 2. What are the legal considerations of the panel of judges in destroying cases of obscene acts in decision no. 769/pid.B/2021/PN rap? The method used in this writing is using the Juridical Normative Empirical method, which is conducting field research, namely to the Rantauprapat District Court with the interview method, to support the data the author needs, and also taking references from various books, legislation, articles, scientific essays, and other readings that are related to the problems discussed in the preparation of this article. The problem of obscene acts with threats of violence committed by adults against adults in which the article that regulates obscene acts contains article 289 of the Criminal Code concerning "Whoever commits violence, is forced to commit immoral acts and forces others to release their lust will be punished with 9 years." prison". Article 281 of the Criminal Code, the convict is threatened with 2 years and 8 months in prison and a fine of Rp. 4.500.000,- the author takes the example of the case from the decision NO. 769/PID.B/2021/PN RANTAUPRAPAT.