Survey Implementation Curriculum 2013 in Sports and Health Physical Education Lessons at State Vocational School in District Sampang

M. Imam Yusuf W, Advendi Kristiyandaru, Heryanto Nur Muhammad

Abstract


This study aims to describe the implementation of PBL, PjBL, DL learning models and learning outcomes in PJOK subjects. This research was carried out in 3 schools that implemented the 2013 Curriculum with a research sample of 3 teachers and 283 students at State Vocational Schools throughout Sampang District. This research is a quantitative research with a survey design, the research sampling technique uses random sampling. The instruments used in this study were questionnaires, interview guidelines, observation sheets and cognitive tests. Data analysis used one way annova analysis and multiple linear regression through SPSS version 15. The results showed that the implementation of PBL learning for students in State Vocational High Schools in Sampang District was included in the good category with an average score of 100.8, the percentage was 69.52%; the implementation of PjBL learning for students in State Vocational High Schools throughout Sampang District is included in the good category with an average score of 96.13, the percentage is 66.30%; The implementation of DL learning for students at State Vocational Schools throughout Sampang District is included in the good category with an average score of 26.75, a percentage of 76.43%, and through multiple linear regression tests it can be concluded that the PBL, PjBL, and DL learning models of State Vocational High School students throughout -Sampang District is proven to affect learning outcomes with a contribution of 25%; R^2 = 0.250; F_table(3.279) = 26.37; p < 0.01. The conclusion is that data analysis of PJOK learning outcomes at State Vocational Schools in Sampang District using the PBL, PjBL, and DL learning models can improve student learning outcomes, as evidenced by the average PJOK score of 80, the interval score of ability to work on PTS questions for State Vocational High School students throughout -Sampang District is in the interval of 70 to 80; and completeness of classical learning outcomes above 80%. The results of the regression test also found that the PBL learning model (β = 0.389; p < 0.01) had a stronger effect on learning outcomes than the PjBL learning model (β = 0.229; p < 0.01) while the DL learning model had no significant effect on learning outcomes.


Keywords


PBL learning; PjBL learning; DL learning; PJOK learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W dan D.R. Krathwohl. 2015. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, Dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Anugraheni, Raras Rakasiwi dan Indri. 2020. “Meta Analisis Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar.” Elementary School 7 vol II: 208–14.

Ariyanti. 2018. Program Peningkatan Kompetensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Zonasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Astuti, R.W., Waluyo, H.J., and Rohmadi, M. (2019). Character Education Values in Animation Movie of Nussa and Rarra. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 215-219.

Azhar,A. (2018). Students’ Trends in Islamic Communication Postgraduate in2010-2016 State Islamic University of North Sumatera (UINSU). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), P.206-214

Deluca. 2016. “The GriDc Project Developing Student’s Thinking Skills in a Data-Rich Environment.” Journal of Technology Education 23.

Fitri, H., Dasna, I. W., dan Suharjo. 2018. “Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning (PjBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual vol 3: no 2.

Greenstein, L. 2012. Assessing 21 Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. California: Corwin, A Sage Company.

Hidayat, Sholeh. 2013. Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Hosnah. 2014. Pendekatan Saintifik Dan Kontekstual Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Kamin, Chinedu. 2015. Strategies For Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills In Teaching And Learning of Design And Technology Educatio. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Kemendikbud. 2012. “Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013.”

Maksum, Ali. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Dalam Olahraga. Surabaya: UNESA UNIVERSITY PRESS.

Muslich, Mansur. 2017. KTSP.Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi Dan Kontekstual Panduan Bagi Guru Kepala Sekolah Dan Pengawas Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ngalimun. 2012. Strategi Dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Presindo.

Noor, A.M. 2019. “Pedagogical Issues In Intergrating Thingking Skills in The Classroom.” International Journal for Education Studies 2(1): 55–68.

Phasa, K. C. 2020. “Meta Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika.” Cendekia Pendidikan Matematika volume 04(no 02 November 2020): 711–23.

Saleh, A., Mujahiddin. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Community Empowerment Practices in Indonesia during the Covid-19 Pandemic through Strengthening the Role of Higher Education. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). Volume 3, No 2, Page: 1105-1113

Royani, Aniq. 2017. “Penerapan Teknik Pembelajaran Kooperatif NHT Dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Tentang Bumi Bagian Dari Alam Semesta.” Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual 2(3): 294.

Sani, R.A. 2016. Penilaian Autentik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sari, Khairunisa Kurnia. 2020. “Survei Implementasi Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Dan Problem Based Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Di Sma-Ma Negeri Jabodetabek.”

Setianingsih. 2016. Transformasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Sugiono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. ed. Setiyawami. Yogyakarta: ALFABETA.

Suratno, Suratno, Kamid Kamid, and Yulita Sinabang. 2020. “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Hots) Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa.” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial 1(1): 127–39.

Susanto, Ahmad. 2013. Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Tembang, Y Sulton Suharjo. 2017. “Peningkatan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share Berbantuan Media Gambar Di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang Vol 2(No 6): hal 812-817.

Wicaksana Hafid, Mardiyana dan Budi Usodo. 2016. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dan Discovery Learning (DL) Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Materi Himpunan Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (Aq) Peserta Didik. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Widodo, T & Kadarwati. 2013. “High Order Thinking Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Berorentasi Pembentukan Karakter Siswa.” Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan vol 31(1): no 161-171.

Yusmanto, H. 2017. “Meningkatkan Higer Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Dan Hasil Belajar IPS Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Corousel Feedback Dan Round Tabel (Studi Pada SMPS Islam Terpadu Darul Azhar Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara) Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan.” In Malang: Pascasarjana UM.

Yusuf, F. 2018. “Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif.” Jurnal tarbiyah: Jurnal ilmiah kependidikan vol 7(1): 17–23.

Zehrihun, Z. Beisshunein, J & Van Os, W. 2013. “Student Learning Experience as Indicator of Teachin Quality.” Educationnal Assessment, Evaluastion and Accountability 24.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4860

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 74 times
PDF - 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.