_.gif)
_.gif)
Comparison of Passive Construction Kena in Indonesian and Hona in Angkola: X-Bar Theory Analysis
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and describe the structure of passive sentences with the construction ofkena in Bahasa Indonesia (BI) and hona in Bahasa Angkola (BA). The theory used is X-bar, which is one of the areas of study in Transformative Generative Grammar examining the structure of phrases. This research is qualitative since it emphasizes the information and data collection in the form of words or pictures in order that it does not emphasize on numbers. The data and data sources in this study are passive sentences BI and BA using the wordkena and hona. The data analysis technique used is the 'agih' technique in which the data analysis method whose determining tool is actually part of the language. Then the sentence as data formed from the data source is analyzed using X-bar theory. The results of this study indicate that the sentence structure in BI is formed with the pattern of Subject + Predicate + Object (SPO) and in BA is Predicate + Object + Subject (POS). The passive has to show the pattern: 1) FI = Spes + I; 2) Spes = NP – N; 3) I = appears/not appear; 4) I = FV + FN; and 5) FV = kena + N. The passive construction hona in BA has the pattern: 1) FI = I + Spes; 2) I = appears/not appear; 3) I = FV + FN; 4) Spes = NP – N; and 5) FV = hona + N. Another conclusion is that the verbkena and hona will always be followed by noun phrase (FN) or noun (N), although it seems that the words appearing afterkena and hona are considered as verb or adjectives.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AM Moeliono. (1992). “Standard grammar of the Indonesian language.
AM Siregar and S. Mahdi. (2017). “BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS OF THE TOBA BATAK LANGUAGE,”.
AS Koh. (1990). “Topics in colloquial Malay.”.
CA Black. (1999). “A step-by-step introduction to the Government and Binding theory of syntax,” SIL-Mexico Branch Univ. North Dakota.
D. Sugiyono. (2013). "Educational research methods with quantitative, qualitative and R&D approaches,".
D. Sugono. (2013). Proficient in Indonesian correctly. Gramedia Main Library.
D. Suprato. (2012). "Contrative Analysis of Indonesian Passive Sentences with English," Humanities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 290–298.
H. Nomoto and KA Wahab. (2011). "Passive Construction Affected in Indonesian: Comparison with Malay," Masy. Linguist. Indonesia., p. 111.
HB Sutopo. (2002). “Qualitative research methodology.” Surakarta: UNS press.
IS Lubis. (2020). “PASSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF ANGKOLA: X-BAR THEORY,” J. Educ. Dev., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 369.
L. Haegeman. (2020). Introduction to government and binding theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
M. Ramlan. (1987). "Syntax of Indonesian Language," Yogyakarta: Karyono Publisher.
MM Mulyadi. (2010). “Indonesian Prepositional Phrases: X Bar Analysis,” review. Literature, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
N. Oktaviyanti. (2012). "CONTRASTIVITY OF INDONESIAN PASSIVE SENTENCES WITH JAPANESE (Study of Structure and Meaning)," Students e-Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1.
PR Kroeger. (2004). Analyzing syntax: A lexical-functional approach. Cambridge University Press.
R.Sibarani. (1997). Toba Batak Language Syntax. University of North Sumatra (USU) Press,.
RS Wulandari, S. Zulaihah, and H. Hurustyanti. (2017). "Analysis of Passive Sentence Structures in English and Indonesian through Contrastive Recognition," DEIKSIS, vol. 9, no. 03, pp. 374–384.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Methods and various techniques of language analysis: An introduction to linguistic research on cultural vehicles. Ambassador of Discourse University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4890
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 39 timesPDF - 23 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.