Parents' Perceptions of Children's Learning Activities At Home during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Gang Serasi, Berastagi District

Elizon Nainggolan, Kevin Josua Kanta, Rosdiana Rosdiana, Mahfuzi Irwan

Abstract


This research is motivated by the problem of how parents perceive their children's learning activities at home during the Covid-19 pandemic in Gang Serasi, Berastagi District.  The purpose of this study was to find out an overview of parents' perceptions of their children's learning activities at home during the Covid-19 pandemic in Gang Serasi, Berastagi District.  The type of research used is descriptive with a quantitative approach.  The sample in this study amounted to 40 people.  Sampling using total sampling technique.  The data collection tool used was a questionnaire and the data were analyzed using data descriptions and trend testing.  The results showed that the parental perception variable on the cognitive, affective, and conative indicators as a whole was at an average score of 2.41 with a low interpretation.  The results of the trend test of the research variables showed that the research variables were at a very low tendency with the largest number of respondents, namely 62.5%.  The conclusion in this study is that parents' perceptions of children's learning activities at home during the Covid-19 pandemic in Gang Serasi, Berastagi District based on cognitive, affective, and conative indicators are in low interpretation criteria.  That is, parents consider children's learning activities at home to cause children to not understand learning, learning activities are not effective, children tend to be lazy in doing assignments, and parents are burdened because they have to teach children at home and supervise them.


Keywords


parents' perceptions; pandemic covid-19

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acocella & Calhoun. (1955). Psikologi Tentang Penyesuaian Dan Hubungan Kemanusiaan. Terjemahan Satmoko, Semarang : IKIP Semarang.

Amalia, Umi. 2003. Pengaruh Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Profesi Guru Teknik Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Terhadap Keberhasilan Belajar. Bandung: Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Sipil Jurusan Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan FPTK UPI

Alex Sobur. 2003. Psikologi Umum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Al Muchtar, Suwarma. 2007. Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan IPS. Bandung: SPS UP

Bimo Walgito. 2004. Pengantar psikologi Umum. Jakarta: Penerbit Andi

Dakir. 1993. “Dasar-Dasar Psikologi”. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gerungen, W.A. 1996. Psikologi Sosial. Bandung: Eressco

Handayani, santhy. (2005). Hubungan Tentang Kinerja Guru PPL dengan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Tingkat 1 SMK Negeri 5 Bandung. Skripsi. FPTKUPI Bandung. Tidak Diterbitkan.

Husein, Umar. 2013. Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis.Jakarta:Rajawali

Listyana, Rohmaul dan Hartono, Ydi. 2015. Persepsi Dan Sikap Masyarakat Terhadap Penanggalan Jawa Dalam Penentuan Waktu Pernikahan (Studia Kasus Desa Jonggrang Kecamatan Barat Kabupaten Magetan Tahun 2013). Jurnal Agastya Vo; 5 No 1 Januari 2015

Masyhuri dan M. Zainuddin. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi, Teori dan Aplikasi. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung

Pratiwi, Eliska, I Nyoman Sujuna, dan Iyus Akhmad Haris. 2019. “Persepsi dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Penerapan Program kerja BUMDES Dwi Amertha Sari di Desa Jinengdalem”. Jurnal Pendidikan ekonimi Undiksha. Vol 11. No 1.

Dahlan, Rahmat. 2014. ´Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Nazir Terhadap Wakaf Uang”. Jurnal Universitas Prof. Dr. Hamka. Vol. VI. No. 2.

Saputra, S. A. 2007. Statistika.Bandung : FPTK UPI.

Sardiman, A. . (2011). Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sarlito W. Sarwono.2000. Berkenalan Dengan Aliran-aliran Dan Tokoh-tokoh Psikologi. Jakarta: PT. Bulan Bintang.

Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhiya. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2009. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Sugihartono dkk. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono.2012. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif”. Bandung : Alfabeta.

--------------. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sudjana. 2001. Metode Dan Teknik Pembelajaran Parsitipatif. Bandung: Falah Production.

Sugihartono, dkk.2007. PsikologiPendidikan.Yogyakarta: UNY Pres

Sunaryo. 2004. Psikologi Untuk Pendidikan. Jakarta: EGC.

Thoha, Miftah.2003,Kepemimpinan Dalam Manajemen,Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Wood, Julia T. 2013 Komunikasi Interpersonal dalam interaksi Keseharian, Jakarta: Salemba Humanika




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4913

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 27 times
PDF - 19 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.