_.gif)
_.gif)
Analysis of Divided Government Phenomena Post 2018 Governor Election in West Kalimantan
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and find out and explain the symptoms of a divided government after the 2018 West Kalimantan governor election, the impact on government administration and the split government leadership model. The theoretical framework of this research is made in stages starting from the grand theory: Government Science and the Concept of Good Governance, middle-range theory: Conflict Theory, Cultural Concepts, Government Decentralization, Democratic Political System, Applied Theory: Leadership Theory (Nanus (1992: 136-141), Model Theory. This research uses qualitative methods, with data collection techniques through interviews, observations and documentation studies. The study results indicate that the direct election of the Governor and deputy governor of West Kalimantan Province will strengthen the decentralization system, which will have positive impacts; The first is the development of democratic life, including accountability to the people directly. Second, The legitimacy of the regional head from the people is getting higher. Namely, the principle of state sovereignty in the hands of the people is realized. Third, the support and participation of the people towards Government, development and social society are getting higher. However, it also has negative impacts, including, first, leaving a residue of conflict between supporters in the structure of society. Second, there is a pattern of a split government system that allows for disruption of government effectiveness. Third, implementation costs are not small, thus opening up opportunities for the Governor and Deputy Governor of West Kalimantan Province for corruption, collusion and nepotism. In the condition that the divided government pattern will minimize the negative impact on the wheels of Government which is less/ineffective, the Governor and Deputy Governor of West Kalimantan Province must build political support with the DPRD.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Desain penelitian. Pendekatan Kualitatif & Kuantitatif, Jakarta: KIK.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.Psycnet.
Dewanta, A. S. (2016). Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah. UNISIA, (53), 325-329.
Dewantara, A. W. (2017). Kerasulan Awam di Bidang Politik (Sosial-Kemasyarakatan), Dan Relevansinya Bagi Multikulturalisme Indonesia. JPAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Katolik, 18(9), 3-15.
Elgie, R. (2001). Divided Government In Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fuadi, S. H. (2020). Resolusi Konflik Sosial Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat pada Pemilihan Kepala Desa Bajang Mlarak Ponorogo. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 2(1), 86-111.
Haris, S. (2005). Pemilu langsung di tengah oligarki partai: proses nominasi dan seleksi calon legislatif Pemilu 2004. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hofman, B., Kaiser, K., & Goga, S. (2002). Decentralizing Indonesia-Regional Public Expenditure Review: Overview Report. World Bank. Washington DC.
Howell, W., Adler, S., Cameron, C., & Riemann, C. (2000). Divided Government, And the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-94. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 285-312.
Maryam, S. N. (2017). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. JIPSI-Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi UNIKOM, 6.
Pardede, M. (2014). Implikasi Sistem Pemilihan Umum Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3(1), 85-99.
Permata, A. N. (2008). Islamist Party And Democratic Participation: Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) In Indonesia 1998-2006 (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Münster).
Prasetya, I. Y. (2011). Pergeseran Peran Ideologi Dalam Partai Politik. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(1), 30-40.
Prasojo, E. (2003). Problem dan Perpektif Desentralisasi Politik di Indonesia harkat bangsa, Dalam Otonomi Daerah Evaluasi Dan Perpektif Patnership, Jakarta: Yayasan Rimba Persada.
Prianto, B. (2016). Partai Politik, Fenomena Dinasti Politik dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah, dan Desentralisasi. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(2).
Rosana, E. (2012). Partai Politik dan Pembangunan Politik. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 8(1), 135-150.
Saraswati, R. (2010). Aplikasi Calon Perseorangan Sebagai Kepala Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Di Daerah. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 39(4), 359-365
Setiawan, R., Samin, R., & Mahadiansar, M. (2018). Dampak Desentralisasi terhadap Kapabilitas Kepala Daerah (Studi Kasus Gubernur Riau Periode Tahun 2008-2013). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JUAN), 6(2), 15-24.
Solihah, R., & Witianti, S. (2016). Pelaksanaan Fungsi Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Pasca Pemilu 2014: Permasalahan dan Upaya Mengatasinya. Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(2), 291-307.
Sulaiman, B. H. (2020). Pola Hubungan Eksekutif Dan Legislatif Dalam Penyelenggaraan Otsus di Daerah. Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 487-499.
Vermonte, P. (2015). Indonesia's 2014 Elections: Practical Innovations and Optimistic Outcomes. Asian Politics & Policy, 7(2), 303-312.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4948
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 42 timesPDF - 27 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.