Job Satisfaction Analysis Using Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) In the Public Sector

Maulida Nailissaadah, Suharnomo Suharnomo

Abstract


Face revolution industry 4.0 and competition between company that very competitive, company need own source power which qualified. Source power man rated important because considered capable synergize with source power which other in effort reach objective organization. Satisfaction work is Thing important which expected by para employee moment they work in something company. For create satisfaction work, no easy because there is many the factor that affect it. Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) is which used in study this. Study this researching the difference between Gen X and Gen Y for differentiate level satisfaction work them. Study this use method analysis quantitative. In study this got results that no there is difference significant level satisfaction work employee generations X and Y. But on the indicator variety, ability utilization, working condition, security and creativity. there is difference level satisfaction.


Keywords


satisfaction employment; MSQ; public sector

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abugre, J. B. (2014). Job satisfaction of public sector employees in sub-saharan Africa: Testing the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire in ghana. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(10), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.903268

Gibson, I. D. (1995). Organisasi, Perilaku, Struktur, Proses (Edisi 5). Jakarta: IKIP Erlagga.

Golshan, N. M., Kaswuri, A. H., Aghashahi, B., & Amin, M. (2011). Effects of Motivational Factors on Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Study on Malaysian Gen-Y Administrative and Diplomatic Officers. IPEDR, 19, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.ipedr.com/vol19/1-ICAMS2011-A00004.pdf

Karimi, R., Malik, M. I., & Dr. Hussain, S. (2011). Examining the Relationship of Performance Appraisal System and Employee Satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(22).

Luthans, F. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi (Edisi 10). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior (Third Edit). New York: The McGraw-Hll Companies Inc.

Rivai, V., & Sagala, E. J. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan (Edisi 2). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi (12th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Singh, G., & Slack, N. J. (2016). Job Satisfaction of Employees Undergoing Public Sector Reform in Fiji. (April), 313–323.

Sugiyono. (2013). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Taurisa, C. M., & Ratnawati, I. (2012). Analisis pengaruh budaya organisasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasional dalam meningkaatkan kinerja pegawai. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi (JBE), 170–187.

Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R., England, G., & Lofquist, L. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Voccational Rehabilitation, p. 125.

Yannizar, et al. (2020). Analysis of Good Corporate Governance, Free Cash Flow, Leverage towards Earning Management, and Shareholder Wealth in Service Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal).P. 2567j-2567v.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5199

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 200 times
PDF - 512 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.