The Element Of Forced Defense In Giving Reasons For Eliminating Crimes For Victims Of "Begal" According To Article 49 KUHP

I Komang Suardika, Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa

Abstract


This study was made to find out and analyze the elements that must be met in forced self-defense in accordance with Article 49 of the Criminal Code and the reasons for eliminating criminals for victims who carry out self-defense by force . The type of normative legal research is used in this study so that the approach taken is a statutory approach with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials as legal material and the case approach is carried out by examining cases related to the legal issues at hand. The document study technique is used as a technique for collecting legal materials, then the legal materials are evaluated, interpreted, argued and discussed descriptively. The results of the study show (1) in accordance with Article 49 of the Criminal Code, the elements that must be fulfilled by someone who makes a forced defense to erase a crime or reduce his sentence are 1). The defense made must be forced. 2). Defending oneself, others, honor, decency and property, 3). There must be an attack or threat and 4). The attack is against the law and (2) the reason for the abolition of the crime consists of reasons for forgiveness and reasons for justification, to be able to apply the reason for the abolition of the criminal as a legal basis against someone who is forced to defend himself as contained in Article 49 of the Criminal Code by fulfilling various elements.


Keywords


Article 49 of the Criminal Code; the reason for the abolition of the crime; forced defense

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nasution, Eva. “Hal-Hal Yang Menghapus Hukuman”, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Moeljatno. 1993. “Asas-asas Hukum Pidana”. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

__________ 2008. “ Asas-asas Hukum Pidana ”. Jakarta: PT. Rinka Cipta.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 2003. “Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia”. Jakarta: PT. Refika Aditama.

Soesilo, R. 1996. “ Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Penjelasannya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal” . Bogor: Politea.

Sudarto. 2018. “Hukum Pidana I edisi revisi”. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto.

Agung, Anak Agung Gede. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Perampokan Pembunuhan Atas Dasar Pembelaan Paksa”. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol. 2 Nomor 1.

Aurianti, M Rizki. 2015. “ Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Anak di Pengadilan Negeri Bantul (Studi Kasus Nomor 223/Pid.B/2014/PN.BTL)”. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Nofrela, Dwi Putri, dkk. 2016. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Karena Melampaui Batas Pembelaan Diri”. JOM Fakultas Hukum, Vol. III, No. 2.

Putri, Chita Reziane Riyanto dan Dey Ravena. 2020. “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kepanjen Dalam Kasus Pembunuhan Pelaku Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (begal) Terkait Pembelaan Paksa Untuk Diri Sendiri dan Orang Lain”. Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 6, nomor 2.

Tabaluyan, Roy Roland. 2015. “Pembelaan Paksa Yang Melebihi Batas Menurut Pasal 49 KUHP”. Kejahatan Lex, Vol. IV, No. 6.

Anandiza, Putri Salsabila Mutiara. 2021. “Batas Pembelaan Diri Berdasarkan KUHP”. Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Perlindungan. Dapat dilihat di https://lbhpengayoman.unpar.ac.id/limit-pembelaan-diri-berdasarkan-kitab-undang-undang-undang-pidana/ , diakses pada 28 April 2022.

Ariefana, Pebriansyah. 2022. “ Kenapa Korban Begal di Lombok Jadi Tersangka? Ada Apa dengan Amaq Sinta? Ini jawaban dari Polda NTB.” Tersedia di https://www.voice.com/news/2022/04/15/165213/kenapa-korban-begal-di-lombok-jadi-tersangka-apa-salah-amaq-sinta-ini-ansian-polda- ntb , diakses pada 20 April 2022.

Undang-undang

UUD Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang KUHP

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak Sipil dan Politik




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5231

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 60 times
PDF - 16 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.