_.gif)
_.gif)
Government with Algorithm: Strategy to Improve Synchronous Public Service Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Indonesia
Abstract
This study reviews how government by algorithm uses AI in the public sector. Artificial intelligence has been heralded as the next source of business value in the public and private sectors. Building on organizational resource-based theory and recent work on AI in organizational contexts, this study (1) identifies AI-specific resources that together create AI capabilities, (2) develops models to capture AI capabilities in public services, and (3) looks at public trust capabilities, and (3) examines the relationship between AI capabilities and creativity and organizational performance. The research method uses a qualitative approach with a case study strategy. This type of case study is explanatory. Empirical findings show that Artificial Intelligence (AI) changes how government agencies carry out their functions and roles to improve performance, compliance, and security activities in public service and public goods. Rapid developments in AI can reduce essential governance costs and improve quality and power-based administrative data so that government performance is more efficient and effective. The implications prove that AI capabilities result in increased creativity and organizational performance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Khayer, Y. Bao, and B. Nguyen, ‘Understanding cloud computing success and its impact on firm performance: an integrated approach’, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 963–985, 2020.
A. S. Aydiner, E. Tatoglu, E. Bayraktar, and S. Zaim, ‘Information system capabilities and firm performance: Opening the black box through decision-making performance and business-process performance’, Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 47, no. July 2018, pp. 168–182, 2019.
A. S. Bharadwaj And V. Grover, ‘Q Rmis Qrterjy Information Technology Capability And Firm Performance : An’, Mis Q., Vol. 24, No. 1, Pp. 169–196, 2016.
B. Gärtner and M. R. W. Hiebl, ‘Issues with big data’, Routledge Companion to Account. Inf. Syst., pp. 161–172, 2017.
B. Y. E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee, ‘Artificial intelligence for real’, Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. July, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2017.
D. Bonaretti, M. Bartosiak, T. W. Lui, G. Piccoli, and D. Marchesani, ‘“What can I(S) do for you?”: How technology enables service providers to elicit customers’ preferences and deliver personalized service’, Inf. Manag., vol. 57, no. 6, p. 103346, 2020.
D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt, and R. D. Ireland, ‘Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box’, Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 273–292, 2007.
D. Greiling and B. birgit grueb@jku at Grüb, ‘Towards citizen accountability of local public enterprises’, Ann. Public Coop. Econ., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 641–655, 2015.
G. Schryen, ‘Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there’, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 139–169, 2013.
H. Jacoby and S. Paltsev, ‘What To Expect From Sectoral’, MITSloan Manag. Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 2017.
J. A. Y. B. Barney, ‘Is the Resource-Based " View " a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research ? Yes Author ( s ): Jay B . Barney Source : The Academy of Management Review , Vol . 26 , No . 1 ( Jan ., 2001 ), pp . 41-56 Published by : Academy of Management Stable’, Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2001.
J. Andersén, ‘Strategic resources and firm performance’, Manag. Decis., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2011.
J. B. Barney, ‘Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view’, J. Manage., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2001.
J. B. Barney, D. J. Ketchen, and M. Wright, ‘The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline?’, J. Manage., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1299–1315, 2011.
J. Benitez, A. Castillo, J. Llorens, and J. Braojos, ‘IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability’, Inf. Manag., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 131–143, 2018.
J. Lin et al., ‘How do social commerce-IT capabilities influence firm performance? Theory and empirical evidence’, Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 155–171, 2020.
L. Fiorini, ‘How artificial intelligence will change the future of bullion production’, 42nd Int. Precious Met. Inst. Annu. Conf. IPMI 2018, pp. 60–69, 2018.
Lukman Samboteng, Rulinawaty, M. F. Akbar, and Muh.Rachmat Kasmad, ‘Talent management of state civil officers ( ASN ), bureaucratic digitalization era in Indonesia’, vol. 41, no. 31, pp. 157–169, 2020.
M. Edlins and S. Dolamore, ‘Ready to serve the public? The role of empathy in public service education programs’, J. Public Aff. Educ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 300–320, 2018.
M. Link, C. Dukino, W. Ganz, K. Hamann, and K. Schnalzer, ‘The Use of AI-Based Assistance Systems in the Service Sector: Opportunities, Challenges and Applications’, in Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction, 2020, pp. 10–16.
McKinsey et al., ‘The emergence of Agile people management’, Res. Technol. Manag., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 3–10, Jan. 2019.
N. Haefner, J. Wincent, V. Parida, and O. Gassmann, ‘Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda✰’, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 162, no. October 2020, p. 120392, 2021.
Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940
P. A. Busch and H. Z. Henriksen, ‘Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion’, Inf. Polity, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 2018.
P. Bromiley and D. Rau, ‘Operations management and the resource based view: Another view’, J. Oper. Manag., vol. 41, pp. 95–106, 2016.
P. Makhija and E. Chacko, ‘Efficiency and Advancement of Artificial Intelligence in Service Sector with Special Reference to Banking Industry’, in Fourth Industrial Revolution and Business Dynamics: Issues and Implications, N. R. Al Mawali, A. M. Al Lawati, and A. S, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021, pp. 21–35.
P. Mikalef And A. Pateli, ‘Information Technology-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA’, J. Bus. Res., vol. 70, pp. 1–16, 2017.
P. Mikalef and M. Gupta, ‘Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance’, Inf. Manag., vol. 58, no. 3, p. 103434, 2021.
P. Mikalef, A. Pateli, and R. van de Wetering, ‘IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment’, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 512–540, 2021.
P. Mikalef, I. O. Pappas, J. Krogstie, and M. Giannakos, ‘Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda’, Inf. Syst. E-bus. Manag., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 547–578, 2018.
P. Mikalef, J. Krogstie, I. O. Pappas, and P. Pavlou, ‘Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities’, Inf. Manag., vol. 57, no. 2, 2020.
P. Mikalef, M. Boura, G. Lekakos, and J. Krogstie, ‘The role of information governance in big data analytics driven innovation’, Inf. Manag., vol. 57, no. 7, p. 103361, 2020.
P. Mikalef, S. O. Fjørtoft, and H. Y. Torvatn, ‘Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: A Study of Challenges and Opportunities for Norwegian Municipalities’, in Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society in the 21st Century, 2019, pp. 267–277.
P. Mikalef, S. O. Fjørtoft, and H. Y. Torvatn, ‘Developing an Artificial Intelligence Capability: A Theoretical Framework for Business Value’, in Business Information Systems Workshops, 2019, pp. 409–416.
R. Amit and P. J. Schoemaker, ‘Z strategic assets and organizational rent’, Strateg. Manag., vol. 14, p. 325, 2012.
R. K. Alwi, ‘Dilemma of Values in Public Policy Accountability : Implementation of the Street Vendors Empowerment Policy Networking in Makassar City’, in The Sixth Asian Conference on Business & Public Policy 2015, 2015, no. Public Policy Accountability, pp. 1–14.
R. K. Srivastava, L. Fahey, and H. K. Christensen, ‘The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage’, J. Manage., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 777–802, 2001.
R. Kasmad, Alwi, and L. Tamba, ‘Discretion Dilemma of Street-Level Bureaucracy in Implementation of the Street Vendors Empowerment Policy in Makassar City, Indonesia’, Am. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 106–115, 2018.
R. Ronanki and T. Davenport, ‘Artificial Intelligence for the Real World’, Harv. Bus. Rev., no. February, pp. 1–10, 2018.
Rulinawaty Kasmad, L. Samboteng, and A. Mahsyar, ‘The Unwise Policy Of Community Based-Organisation: Can It Empower Them? Implementation Network Of Food Diversification In Indonesia Rulinawaty’, OPCION, vol. 35, no. 22, pp. 2900–2961, 2019.
Rulinawaty, S. Arifin, and L. Samboteng, ‘Leading Agile Organization Can Indonesian Bureaucracy Become Agile?’, Int. Res. Assoc. Talent Dev. Exellence, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2020.
Rulinawaty, S. Aripin, L. Samboteng, and Andriyansah, ‘Capacity Building Model Of Governance Participatory Network: How Community-Based Organization Is Changing The Culture Of Local Governance In Indonesia’, Int. J. Manag. (Ijm, Vol. 11, No. 12, Pp. 1786–1799, Dec. 2020.
S. Bergsten and P. Rivas, ‘Societal benefits and risks of artificial intelligence: A succinct survey’, 21st Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. …, 2019.
S. Chatterjee, N. P. Rana, K. Tamilmani, and A. Sharma, ‘The effect of AI-based CRM on organization performance and competitive advantage: An empirical analysis in the B2B context’, Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 97, no. July, pp. 205–219, 2021.
S. Lins, K. D. Pandl, H. Teigeler, S. Thiebes, C. Bayer, and A. Sunyaev, ‘Artificial Intelligence as a Service: Classification and Research Directions’, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 441–456, 2021.
S. Ransbotham, D. Kiron, P. Gerbert, And M. Reeves, ‘Findings From The 2017 Artificial Intelligence Global Executive Study And Research Project Reshaping Business With Artificial Intelligence Research Report In Collaboration With’, Mit Sloan Manag. Rev., Vol. Fall, No. 59181, Pp. 1–17, 2017.
S. Yeniyurt, F. Wu, D. Kim, and S. T. Cavusgil, ‘Information technology resources, innovativeness, and supply chain capabilities as drivers of business performance: A retrospective and future research directions’, Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 79, no. xxxx, pp. 46–52, 2019.
T. Lumpkin and G. Waring, ‘Id the Resource’, vol. 26, 2001.
V. Kumar, B. Rajan, R. Venkatesan, and J. Lecinski, ‘Understanding the role of artificial intelligence in personalized engagement marketing’, Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 135–155, 2019.
V. Sambamurthy, A. Bharadwaj, and V. Grover, ‘Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms’, MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 237–264, 2003.
W. M. P. van der Aalst, M. Bichler, and A. Heinzl, ‘Responsible Data Science’, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 311–313, 2017.
Y. Chen, Y. Wang, S. Nevo, J. Jin, L. Wang, and W. S. Chow, ‘IT capability and organizational performance: The roles of business process agility and environmental factors’, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 326–342, 2014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5272
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 136 timesPDF - 39 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.