Conformity Theory (Munasabah) In Ushul Fiqh

M. Jafar

Abstract


In the logic of Islamic law (qiyas) there is 'illat as the reason for establishing a law and justifying an analogy. Imam al-Ghazali included munasabah (conformity) in the category of his masalik al-'illah. Even in his work al-Mustasfa he is more focused and uses more the theory of munasabah as 'illat law. This can be seen clearly in his discussion of the qiyas chapter which was preceded as an introduction to the discussion of istislah (maslahah). Because munasabah has something to do with maslahah. In conformity theory (munasabah) there is al-awsaf munasab (appropriate attributes). Furthermore, this fate is divided into 3, namely: effective fate (mu'atstsir), harmonious fate (mula'im) and odd fate (gharib). Effective munasib (mu'atstsir) is an attribute that is known to be 'illat law based on the statement of the text or the existence of consensus. Munasib in harmony (mula'im) is an attribute that is known to be legal illat not because of a nas or ijmak statement, but because of its conformity with the law. The odd fate referred to by al-Ghazali is a fate that is not in harmony with the genus of law-making acts or there is no comparable example elsewhere.


Keywords


Conformity Theory; Usul Fiqh

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Ishaq Ibrahim. (1997). al-Lakhmi al-Qirnati ash-Syatibi, Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Ahkam, 3rd cet, Volume I, Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah.

Ahmad Hasan. (1994). Analogical Reasoning In Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridical Principle of Qiyas, Delhi: Adam Publishers and Distribution.

Ahmad Hasan. (1994). The Early Development of Islamic Juresprudence, Delhi: Adam Publishers and Distribution.

Al-Tufi. (1990). Syarh Mukhtasar al-Raudhah, Juz III, Beirut: Mu'assasah al-Risalah.

Amin Abdullah, et al. (ed.). (2000). Anthology of Islamic Studies: Theory and Methodology, Yogyakarta: Sunan Kalijaga Press.

Amir Syarifuddin, Ushul Fiqh. (1997). Volume I, Jakarta: Logos Discourse on Science.

Bertrand Russell. (2002). History of Western Philosophy, translated: Sigit Jatmiko, et al., Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cik Hasan Basri. (2003). Fiqh Research Model; Fiqh Research Paradigm and Research Fiqh, jld 1, Jakarta: Prenada Media.

David O'Sears, et. al. (1985). Second Volume of Social Psychology, trans. Michael Adryanto, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Fazlur Rahman. (1994). Islam, translated: Ahsin Mohammad, 2nd cet, Bandung: Pustaka.

Imam Suprayogo and Tobroni. (2003). Socio-Religious Research Methodology, Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Jalaluddin Rakhmat. (1996). Communication Psychology, Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.

Josef van Ess. (1970). “The Logical Structure of Islamic Theology”, in Issa J Boullata (ed.) An Anthology of Islamic Studies, McGill: Institute of Islamic Studies McGill University.

Joseph Schacht. (1950). The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Judith Romney Wegner. (1982). “Islamic and Talmudic Jurisprudence: the Four Roots of Islamic Law and Their Talmudic Counterparts”, in The American Journal of Legal History, vol. XXVI.

Kamal Muchtar, et al. (1995). Ushul Fiqh, volume 1, Yogyakarta: Bhakti Waqf Fund.

Lexy J. Moleong. (2005). Qualitative Research Methodology, Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia, Core Topic of the National Curriculum of Islamic Higher Education Faculty of Sharia, Jakarta: Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia, 1998.

Muhammad Abu Zahrah. (2005). Usul Fiqh, transliterated: Saefullah Ma'sum, et al, cet. 9th, Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.

Muhammad al-Ghazali. (1971). Syifa' al-Ghalil fi Bayan ash-Syabah wa al-Mukhil wa Masalik al-Ta'lil, Baghdad: Matba'ah al-Irsyad.

Muhammad al-Ghazali. (2008). Al-Mustasfa min 'Ilm al-Ushul, 1st cet, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyah.

Muhammad Hashim Kamali. (1996). Principles and Theories of Islamic Law, translated: Noorhaidi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Muhammad Idris ash-Syafi'i. (1969). ar-Risalah li al-Imam al-Muthalibi Muhammad ibn Idris ash-Syafi'i, tahqiq: Muhammad Sayid Kailani, Cairo: Dar al-Fikr.

Muhammad Roy. (2004). Ushul Fiqh of the Aristotelian School: Tracking Aristotelian Logic in Qiyas Usul Fiqh, Yogyakarta: Safira Insni Press.

Rubbert A. Baron. (2005). Social Psychology, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Shely E, et. al. (2009). Twelfth Edition of Social Psychology, trans. Tri Wibowo BS, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Soerjono Soekanto. (1986). Introduction to Legal Research, Jakarta: UI-Press.

Sulaiman Dunya, al-Haqiqah fi Nazar al-Ghazali, Cairo : Dar al-Ma'arif, tt

Syamsul Anwar, Methodology of Islamic Law, Diktat not published.

Wael B. Hallaq. (1997). A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Usul al-Fiqh, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yudian Wahyudi. (2006). Ushul Fiqh Versus Hermeneutics: Reading Islam from Canada and America, Yogyakarta: Nawasea.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5373

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 37 times
PDF - 54 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.