Implementation of the Ultra Petita Decision of the Constitutional Court in Indonesian Legal Practice (Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 30/PUU-XVI/2018)

Rizaldi Abdillah, Diki Okta Dwi Putra, Sandra Firdausi Aprilia, Abdul Rozak

Abstract


Court Constitution is a judicial institution new constitution _ formed post amendment to three 1945 Constitution. As a Judicial Institution naturally Court Constitution have authority in interpret constitution. The problem is interpretations Court Constitution to Tested laws _ often cause norm new, thing this considered as ultra petita conducted by the Court Constitution. As a judicial institution that has independent nature already naturally Court Constitution to do interpretations Constitution. Besides that nature text in Constitution which is open (open text) requires there is an interpretation of text that. However implementation to decisions Court Constitution no seldom experience waiver by related institutions.


Keywords


constitutional court; law; legal practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dr. Isharyanto, SH.,M.Hum & Aryoko Abdurrachman S.H, “Penafsiran Hukum Hakim Konstitusi (Studi terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang No.7 Tahun 2004 tentang Sumber Daya Air)”, Halaman Moeka Publishing, Jakarta, 2016.

Fadzlun Budi Sulistiyono Nugroho, “Sifat Keberlakuan Asas Erga Omnes dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Gorontalo Law Review, 2019.

Haposan Siallagan, “Masalah Putusan Ultra Petita Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang” Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2010.

Janedriji M Gaffar, “Kedudukan, Fungsi dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia”, Surakarta 2009.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, “Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis”, PT.Bhuana Ilmu Populer, Jakarta, 2009.

Jutta Limbach, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution,dalam The Modern Law Review” Volume 64, Nomor 1, Januari 2000.

Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940

Nuria Siswi Enggarani, “Independensi Peradilan dan Negara Hukum” Law & Justice Jurnal Volume 3, 2018.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 09/MK/2006 tentang Pemberlakuan Deklarasi Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 138PUU-VII/2009 Tentang Pengujian Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Rian Van Frits Kapitan, “Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Constitutional Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Mahkamah Agung” Jilid 44 Nomor 4, Oktober 2015.

Sri Sumantri, “Hak Menguji Material di Indonesia”, Penerbit Alumni, Bandung 1982.

Sudikno Mertokusumo & Pitlo, A, “Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum”, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,1993.

Wicaksana Dranada, “Menggagas Penerapan Judicial Restrain di Mahkamah Konstitusi” Bandung, 2014.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5403

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 46 times
PDF - 13 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.