_.gif)
_.gif)
Analysis of the Prosecutor's Authority Regarding the Dissolution of a Limited Liability Company: A Problem Regarding Persona Standi in Judicio
Abstract
In the existing laws and regulations, it is understood that the Prosecutor has the authority to dissolve a Limited Liability Company, but the reasons for the dissolution have not been comprehensively regulated. This will of course have the potential to affect the legal standing of the Prosecutor in submitting the application. Based on this, the formulation of the problem in this article is First, the authority to dissolve a limited liability company by the prosecutor and Second, the judge's legal considerations (ratio decedendi) regarding the authority to dissolve a limited liability company by the prosecutor. This research is a legal research using statutory approach, conceptual approach, and the case approach. Based on the results of the research in this article, it was found that First, the Prosecutor has the authority to dissolve a Limited Liability Company which has been clearly regulated, both in the PT Law, the Prosecutor's Law, and other laws and regulations, but it is related to the reasons for the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company. By the Prosecutor's Office has not been regulated in detail, especially for reasons of public interest. Second, from the 2 (two) existing decisions, namely the Supreme Court Decision Number 3099 K/Pdt/2017 and the Supreme Court Decision Number 2640 K/Pdt/2019 it can be understood that there are things that must be considered regarding the prosecutor's authority in submitting a request for dissolution limited company.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrianto, B. O., Nugraha, X., & Grady, N. (2018). Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 43–62.
Agung, I. B. P. G. (2020). Kewenangan Kejaksaan Mengajukan Permohonan Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas. Kertha Semaya, 8(6), 870.
Dirgantara, F., Muzakki, A., Waluyo, J. E., & Nugraha, X. (2020). Akibat Hukum Tidak Dilakukannya Pemeriksaan Setempat Dalam Gugatan Dengan Objek Sengketa Tanah : Apakah Ada ? 8(30), 600–617. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.780
Effendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Kencana.
Hakim, M. R. (2016). Berkarakteristik Hukum Progresif the Implementation of Rechtsvinding Based on Progressive Law. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5(2), 227–248.
Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi Kedu). Sinar Grafika.
Hartono, J., Rosyadi, J., & Nugraha, X. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Algoritma Harga Sebagai Bentuk Perjanjian Penetapan Harga Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 4(1), 37–49.
Lendrawati, & Sonyatan, S. (2014). Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (Rups) Di Indonesia Dan Australia. Journal of Judicial Review, 16(2), 62–73.
Mahadew, A. R. (2016). The Right To Health In Mauritius: Is The State Doing Enough Or Is The Constitutional Protection Of The Right To Health Still Required. In Litigating the Right to Health in Africa: Challenges and Prospects (hal. 169). Routledge.
Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Revisi) (Edisi Revi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mentari, F. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Dalam Hal Terjadi Merger - Repository Unja. 2(1), 34–48. https://repository.unja.ac.id/28939/
Nugraha, X., Izzaty, R., & Putri, A. A. (2019). Rekonstruksi Batas Usia Minimal Perkawinan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum. 3(1), 40–54.
Nugraha, X., Raharjo, K. W., Ardhiansyah, A., & Raharjo, A. P. (2021). An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v5i2.678
Okman, A., Hasan, Y. A., & Jafar, J. M. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Di Makassar (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 11/Pdt. Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Mks). Clavia Journal of Law, 18(1), 9–24.
Pananjung, M. D. P., Chairunnisa, P., & Triayu, R. (2017). Penerapan Eksaminasi Aktif terhadap Putusan Hakim disertai Prinsip Reward-and-Punishment dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Lembaga Kehakiman yang Bermartabat dan Berintegritas. Padjajaran Law Review, 5(35), 1–18.
Parikesit, R. A. (2021). Penerapan Asas Legalitas (Legaliteit Beginsel/Wetmatigheid Van Bestuur) Dalam Kebijakan Sentralisasi Pengharmonisasian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 450. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i4.809
Prayoga, A., & Rofii, M. S. (2020a). Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas oleh Kejaksaan Sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Ketahanan Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 78–87.
Prayoga, A., & Rofii, M. S. (2020b). Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas oleh Kejaksaan Sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Ketahanan Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 7(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v7i1.3432
Purba, I. G., Syahrin, A. (2019). Demand against Law and Using Authority in Corruption Criminal Action. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). Volume 2, No 4, Page: 194-206.
Putra, H. P. (2020). Assessment Regarding the Nullity or Invalidity of a Governmental Administrative Decision and/or Action. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 3(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.312020.35-50
Sari, N. A. N., Tambunan, E., Felany, P. I., & Nugraha, X. (2019). Implikasi Penafsiran Hak Menguasai Negara Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Politik Hukum Agraria Pada Pulau-Pulau Kecil Di Indonesia. Law Review, 19(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i2.1874
Setiawan, P. J., Nugraha, X., & Tanbun, E. P. (2021). Reformulation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Public Information Requests to Achieve Constructive Law Enforcement and Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i1.122
Setyarini, D. M., Mahendrawati, N. L., & Arini, D. G. D. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.1.1608.12-16
Syaifuddin, M. (2011). Gagasan Pengaturan Hukum Pemeriksaan Perseroan Terbatas (Suatu Evaluasi Normatif terhadap Pasal 138 - Pasal 141 Undang- Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas ). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(2), 274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5498
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 34 timesPDF - 16 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.