Constructive Law Enforcement through Interlocutory Injunction: An Effort to Achieve Procedural Justice

Oki Muji Astuti

Abstract


An interlocutory injunction is a decision that is temporary before examining the subject matter that was handed down before the final decision and can end the examination of the case in court. that based on Article 156 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code states that there are several reasons that the defendant or his legal advisor can submit to the exception or objection of the indictment being unacceptable, including: What is being charged against the defendant is not a crime or violation criminal offense or violation but is included in a civil dispute, but in practice, the Panel of Judges in passing an Interim Decision in a criminal case continues the examination of the case based on the Public Prosecutor's Indictment and the Exception of the Defendant's Legal Counsel is not accepted against the object and subject matter of the same case which has been decided legally. Civil law and has permanent legal force at the level of the Supreme Court. The method used in this study is a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study are expected that the Panel of Judges in giving/imposing an interim decision on a criminal case against the object and subject matter of the same case which has been decided in a civil manner and has permanent legal force, should look at the facts in the trial and the applicable rules, namely the Book of Law. -Law on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), so that it can give/impress the correct interlocutory decision.


Keywords


civil decision; exception; interlocutory injunction; procedural justice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrita, I. (2021). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial di Indonesia. Absolute Media.

Anarki, I. R. (2019). Dasar Hukum pengajuan Eksepsi Dengan Alasan Dakwaan Penuntut Umum Bersifat Prematur (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padangsidimpuan Nomor: 88/Pid.B/2015/PN.PSP). Jurnal Verstek, 5(2), 65–73.

Arief, M. I. (2021). Perbuatan Tersangka/Terdakwa Bukan Merupakan Tindak Pidana. Mekar Citra Lestari.

Budiardjo, M. (1982). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Gramedia.

Effendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Kencana.

Febrian, E. (2019). Splitsing Dalam Perspektif Asas Contante Justitie Dan Asas Non Self Incrimination. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 49(2), 107–130.

Friedman, L. M. (1984). American Law: An Introduction. W.W. Norton and Co.

Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi Kedu). Sinar Grafika.

Hartono, J., Rosyadi, J., & Nugraha, X. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Algoritma Harga Sebagai Bentuk Perjanjian Penetapan Harga Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 4(1), 37–49.

Haryono. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Substantif (Studi Putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VII/2012). Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.1.20-39

Hawilo, M., Albrecht, K., Rountree, M. M., Geraghty, T., Culture, H., Hawilo, M., Albrecht, K., Rountree, M. M., Geraghty, T., Culture, H., Hawilo, M., Albrecht, K., Rountree, M. M., Geraghty, T., Culture, H., & Geraghty, T. (2022). How Culture Impacts Courtrooms: An Empirical Study Of Alienation And Detachment In The Cook County Court System. THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 112(2), 206.

Heylaw. (2022). Bedah Materi PKPA: Jenis-Jenis Eksepsi. https://heylawedu.id/blog/jenis-jenis-eksepsi

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2015). Prinsip- Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Jeremiah Setiawan, P., Nugraha, X., & Srihandayani, L. (2022). Konsep Penegakan Hukum Yang Sistematis Dalam Perselisihan Pra-Yudisial Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art4

Kartoni, Khairani, & Fahmi, K. (2021). Perlindungan Hak Memilih Dalam Pemilihan Umum Melalui Pemutakhiran Data Pemilih Berkelanjutan. Soumatera Law Review., 4(1), 6.

Kasiyanto, A. (2018). Teori Dan Praktik Sistem Peradilan Tipikor Terpadu Di Indonesia Edisi Pertama. Prenada Media.

Kusuma, I. M. W. W., Sepud, I. M., & Karma, N. M. S. (2020). Upaya Hukum Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(2), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.2.2438.73-77

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Revisi) (Edisi Revi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mulyadi, L. (2007). Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Prespektif Teoritis Dan Prakter Pradilan, Mandar Maju, 2007, hal 127. Mandar Maju.

Nugraha, X., Achmadi, R. I., & Sari, N. A. N. (2019). Urgensi Notifikasi Pratransaksi 3P (Penggabungan, Peleburan, Pengambilalihan) Upaya Preventif Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jurnal Legislatif, 2(2), 84–99.

Nugraha, X., Frisa Katherina, A. M., Ramadhanty, S. N., & Tanbun, E. P. (2019). Constitutional Question: Alternatif Baru Pelindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Melalui Concrete Review di Indonesia (Constitutional Question: New Alternative to Protect Citizen’s Constitutional Right From Concrete Review in Indonesia). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1209

Nugraha, X., Katherina, A. M. F., Agustin, W., & Pamungkas, A. (2019). Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Formulasi Baru Upaya Stolen Asset Recovery Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia. Majalah Hukum Nasional. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v49i1.92

Nugroho, S. S. (2022). Filsafat Hukum Mewujudkan Keadilan Berhati Nurani. Lakeisha.

Ramadhan, F., Nugraha, X., & Felany, P. I. (2020). Penataan Ulang Kewenangan Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Ham Berat. Veritas et Justitia. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3514

S.O.M.A. (2010). Soma’s Dictionary of Latin Quotations, Maxims and Phrases: A Compendium of Latin Thought and Rhetorical Instruments for the Speaker, Author and Legal. Trafford Publishing.

Setiawan, P. J., Nugraha, X., & Tanbun, E. P. (2021). Reformulation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Public Information Requests to Achieve Constructive Law Enforcement and Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i1.122

Setiawan, P., Nugraha, X., & Enrick, M. (2020). Analisis Kedudukan Keterangan Korban Terkait Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Dalam Lingkungan Keluarga: Sebuah Antinomi Antara Hukum Materil Dengan Formil. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 9(1), 99–118.

Sumantri, S. (1992). Bunga Rampai Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Alumni.

Sunstein, C. R. (2003). What Did Lawrence Hold ? Of Autonomy , Desuetude , Sexuality , and Marriage Author (. The Supreme Court Review, 2003, 27–74.

Susilo, E. (2020). Surat Dakwaan, Keberatan/Eksepsi,&Bentuk Penyelesaian Hukumnya. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Utama, A. S. (2019). Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 1(3), 306–313.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5517

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 28 times
PDF - 6 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.