The Role of a Notary Process of Making the Acquisition or Share Acquisition in the Order to Realize the Practice Healthy Business Competition
Abstract
Mergers, consolidations, and acquisitions can be a tool for business actors to get rid of their competitors. One of the merger guidelines that can be used to assess whether the consequences of a merger will affect business competition or not is the Merger Review Guidelines (MRG). In Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, it is expressly stated that business actors are obliged to report the occurrence of a merger no later than 30 days after the transaction. A notary is a public official who is authorized to make an authentic deed as long as the making of a certain authentic deed is not reserved for other public officials. From the point of view of laws and regulations, the position of a Notary in the acquisition process is very clear, especially in Government Regulation Number 27 of 1998 concerning Merger, Consolidation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Capital Market Supervisory Agency Regulation Number IX.E.1 concerning Conflicts of Interest in Certain Transactions
Capital Market Supervisory Agency Regulation Number IX.G.1 concerning Business Merger or Business Consolidation of Public Companies or Issuers.
Capital Market Supervisory Agency Regulation Number XK1 concerning Information That Must Be Announced to the Public Immediately
Christianto Wibisono. 1991. Problems of Acquisition Mergers in Indonesia. Indonesian Business Newspaper Edition December 19, 1991.
Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number 09/KPPU-L/2009
Decision of the Chairman of the Capital Market Supervisory Agency Number Kep-52/PM/1997 concerning Business Merger or Business Consolidation of Public Companies or Issuers
Government Regulation Number 27 of 1999 concerning Merger, Consolidation, and Acquisition of Companies
Gunawan Widjaja. 1999. Several things that need to be considered by Pharmaceutical Businesses in the Practice of Implementing Law no. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition (Anticipating Cases of Monopolistic Practices and Litigation). Paper at the National Seminar “Impact of Anti-monopoly Law and Consumer Protection Law on Pharmaceutical Business in Indonesia, Jakarta, GP Pharmacy.
Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies
Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition
Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Market
Notodisoejo, R. Soegando. 1982. Notary Law in Indonesia An Explanation. CV. Rajawali, Jakarta.
Regulation of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number 1 of 2009 concerning Pre-Notification of Merger, Consolidation and Acquisition
Shah, M. M., et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). Volume 3, No 1, Page: 276-286
Situmorang, Victor M. 1993. Grosse Deed in Evidence and Execution. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Syamsul Maarif. 2008. Merger, Consolidation, Acquisition, and Separation of Limited Liability Companies according to Law Number 40 of 2007 and its Relationship with Competition Law. Journal of Business Law, Volume 27 Number 1 of 2008.
Yani, Ahmad and Gunawan Widjaja. 1999. Anti-monopoly Business Law Series. Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5523
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 31 timesPDF - 33 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.