Authority of Samarinda City Governments in Giving License to Open State Land
Abstract
Thesis is entitled "Authority of Samarinda City Governments in Giving License to Open State Land" with 2 (two) main issues, namely: (1) What are the criteria for rejection and acceptance that must be used as guidelines by the Notary Honorary Council for requests for approval of the process? summons to notaries who are not classified as obstruction of justice? (2) What is the legal protection for a Notary whose criteria are not classified as obstruction of justice by the Notary Honorary Council? Besides, this research is a kind of normative research. The research approach used is the statutoryapproachand theconceptual approach. The results of this thesis research indicate that the legal certainty of the decision of the Notary Honorary Council regarding the granting of a Notary summons permit by law enforcers can be formed if law enforcers can fully understand the functions of the Notary Honorary Council. In addition, the Notary Honorary Council must be consistent in making decisions so that there is legal certainty for the Notary. The Central Notary Honorary Council must conduct an examination of the Notary so that the good name of the position is protected and fully guarantees whether the Notary has made a genuine mistake personally or from the parties in the deed. The case should be suspended by the Notary Honorary Council as a form of protection for the position of a Notary, unless the Notary will be examined in a criminal case that has nothing to do with the making of the Notary deed. So that the Notary Honorary Council is not involved with the Obstruction of Justice. In the case of giving testimony, a Notary cannot disclose the deed he made either in part or in whole to other parties, this is in accordance with Article 66 paragraph 1 of the UUJN because as a trustee, the Notary is obliged to keep everything that is notified to him secret in his position as a Notary, even though there are some that are not included in the deed, and have been considered to represent the Notary in a trial so that the deed made by or before the Notary is a piece of evidence that has perfect evidentiary power.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Ghofur Anshori, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2009.
Abdulkadir Muhammad, Etika Hukum Profesi, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.
Anang Alfiansyah, Peran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terhadap Terbukanya Rahasia Jabatan Notaris Dalam Menjalankan Jabatan Publik, Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, Volume 1, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya, Sumatra Selatan, 2019.
Arief Sidharta, Etika Hukum, Laboratorium Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung, 2008.
Arief Sidharta, Meuwissen Tentang Pengembangan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2007.
Ateng Syafrudin, Menuju Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Negara yang Bersih dan Bertanggung Jawab, Jurnal Pro Justitia Edisi IV, Universitas Parahyangan, Bandung, 2000.
Dahlan, Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terkait Aspek Pidana Dibidang Kenotariatan, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 18, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala, 2016.
Elwi Danil, Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana, Dan Pemberantasannya, Rajawali Pers, Depok, 2016.
Ende Hasbi Nassaruddin dan Diah Siti Sa’diah, Pemanggilan Saksi Tanpa Surat Pengadilan Hubungannya Dengan UU No. 8/1981 Tentang KUHAP, Varia Hukum, Volume 1, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2019.
Fence M. Wantu, Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim, Jurnal Berkala Mimbar Hukum, Volume 19, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2007.
Habib Adjie dan Muhammad Hafidh, Memahami: Majelis Kehormatan Notaris (MKN), Sinergi Offset, Semarang, 2016.
Habib Adjie, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2013.
Hartono, Penyidikan dan Penagakan Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2010.
Herlien Budiono, Pertanggung jawaban Notaris berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2004 (Dilema Notaris diantara Negara Masyarakat, dan pasar), Renvoi Nomor 4, Edisi 3, 28, 2005.
Lamintang Dkk, Delik-Delik Khusus : Kejahatan Terhadap Kepentingan Hukum Negara, Sinar Grafiika, Jakarta, 2010.
Lili Rasjidi dan I.B Wysa Putra, Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sistem, Remaja Rusdakarya, Bandung, 1993.
M Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP : Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2010.
Miriam Budiardjo, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2009.
Munir Fuady Dkk, Hak Asasi Tersangka Pidana, Kencana, Jakarta, 2015.
Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940
Oemar Seno Adji dan Insriyanto Seno Adji, Peradilan Bebas dan Contempt Of Court, Diadit Media, Jakarta, 2007.
Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia Dulu, Sekarang Dan Di Masa Akan Datang, PT. Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 2009.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2016 Tentang Majelis Kehormatan Notaris, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 180.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, cetakan ke-8, 2013.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2009.
R. Soegondo Notodisoerjo, Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia, Suatu Penjelasan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1993.
Riduan Syahrani, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1999.
Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013.
Satjipto Raharjo, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2000.
Satochid Kartanegara, Hukum Pidana (Kumpulan Kuliah), Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, 1998.
Shinta Agustina Dkk, Obstruction Of Justice: Tindak Pidana Menghalangi Proses Hukum Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi, Themis Book, Jakarta, 2015.
Subekti, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Cetakan Ke-21, Jakarta, PT. Intermasa, 2001.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Cetakan Pertama, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1986.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5552
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 34 timesPDF - 12 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23e4a/23e4acc4ed22c1ae51d49e8e997e015746b90c24" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a15c9/a15c9e998d11cb44861379dab7cb3a65a275f283" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.