_.gif)
_.gif)
Juridical Analysis of Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding Tax Collection against Taxpayers Who Are Declared Bankrupt: Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 41/PUU-XVIII/2020
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implications of the Constitutional Court's decision on state rights in the context of tax collection, tax law enforcement efforts and fair legal protection and certainty for all parties interacting with legal entities. This study indicates that the state's right to collect taxes is a valid authority not only because it is lawful utilizing normative legal research and a legal approach as normative juridical research that directs research on secondary material such as books, positive legislation, and written norms. Article 23A of the 1945 United States Constitution states that it is constitutionally anchored on the Constitution. This analysis also demonstrates that the arrangements outlined in Article 2 paragraph 6 and Article 32 paragraph 2 of the KUP Law, which are subject to material review, are extremely important and helpful for preserving legal certainty and justice in tax payments.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Absari, G. A. P. D. W., & Parsa, I. W. (2019). Pengenaan Pajak Penerangan Jalan terhadap Konsumsi Tenaga Listrik yang Dihasilkan Sendiri setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 80/PUU-XV/2017. Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3), 1-17.
Ardiansyah, B. G. (2017). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Pajak Daerah. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 1(2), 1-8.
Burton, R. B. (2020). Assessment of Certain Justice towards Tax Omnibus Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(5), 486-493.
Cahyady, Y., & Ambarwati, R. D. (2022). Pembaruan Hukum pada Pengadilan Pajak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi atas Uji Materi terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002. Bunga Rampai Keuangan Negara 2021, 267.
Cahyani, G. A. D., & Suharta, I. N. (2019). Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 63/Puu-Xv/2017 terhadap Penunjukan Kuasa Wajib Pajak. Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(6), 1-15.
Fauziati, P., Minovia, A. F., Muslim, R. Y., & Nasrah, R. (2020). The Impact of Tax Knowledge On Tax Compliance Case Study in Kota Padang, Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies, 2(1), 22-30.
Gerungan, R. M. (2020). Implikasi Hukum dan Legalitas Tax Amnesty terhadap Tingkat Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak di Indonesi dalam Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 63/PUU-XIV/2016. Lex Administratum, 8(1).
Hajawiyah, A., Suryarini, T., & Tarmudji, T. (2021). Analysis of a Tax Amnesty’s Effectiveness in Indonesia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 44, 100415.
Handini, R. S., Ispriyarso, B., & Sa’adah, N. (2022). Kewenangan Menteri Keuangan dalam Pemilihan Ketua dan Wakil Ketua Pengadilan Pajak setelah Dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 10/PUU-XVIII/2020. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 5(1), 90-102.
Harvelian, A. (2017). Implikasi Hukum dan Legalitas Tax Amnesty terhadap Tingkat kepatuhan Wajib Pajak di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(3), 277-294.
Hasan, D. (2021). Konsep Pengenaan Pajak Alat Berat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 15/PUU-XV/2017. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(3), 505-526.
Hermawan, A. W., & Sinaga, H. D. P. (2020). Public Benefit Principle in Regulating E-Commerce Tax on Consumer’s Location in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(08), 1212-1222.
Ilyas, W. B. (2012). Analisis Hukum terhadap Pengenaan Pajak Ganda. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 19(4), 566-585.
Kanantha, A. M., & Edwar, F. (2022). Independensi Pengadilan Pajak Ditinjau dari Pasal 24 Ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 4(3), 519-528.
Parwati, N. N. T., & Parsa, I. W. (2019). Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 15/PUU-XV/2017 terhadap Alat Berat sebagai Obyek Pajak Ganda. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, (3).
Putri, I. P., Yustikaningrum, R. Y., & Devitasari, A. A. (2021). Implementasi Tax on Food dalam Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Hak Pangan Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 39/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(2), 294-320.
Sinaga, B. R. P., Sinaga, E. N., Barus, L. B., Sinaga, R. Y., & Sinaga, H. D. P. (2020). Justice Reconception in Establishing Responsive Tax Law in Indonesia: A Rawlsian Perspective. Ayer Journal, 27(3), 171-189.
Sinaga, H. D. P. (2018, July). Reorientation of Tax Legal Certainty in Indonesia: An Exploration of Transcendental Law. In 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2018) (pp. 282-287). Atlantis Press.
Sugiono, T. V., & Supriyadi, S. (2021). Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 10/PUU-XVIII/2020 atas Mekanisme Pengusulan Ketua dan Wakil Ketua Pengadilan Pajak. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 5(2), 150-163.
Sugitha, K. N. R., & Wairocana, I. G. N. (2018). Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52 Tahun 2011 terhadap Objek Pajak Hiburan Olahraga Golf. Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 1-16.
Wicaksono, D. A., & Nurbaningsih, E. (2020). Ratio Legis Penetapan Pembayar Pajak (Taxpayer) sebagai Kedudukan Hukum dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(3), 461-494.
Wijaya, S., & Arumningtias, D. (2021). Preventing the Potential Tax Avoidance in Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2018. Multicultural Education, 7(1), 288-301.
Wijayanti, N. M. R., & Nurmawati, M. (2018). Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 39/Puu-Xiv/2016 terhadap Barang Kebutuhan Pokok sebagai Objek Pajak Pertambahan Nilai. Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 1-16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5595
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 53 timesPDF - 6 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.