The Analysis of Productivity at PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IV Unit Teh Bah Butong

Syarifah Akmal, Syarifah Yusra

Abstract


PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IV Teh Bah Butong Business Unit, a company that produces products in the form of powdered tea, is one of the companies that continues to grow. Based on observations made in the production processing section, the tea production process often experiences problems. One of the causes is the declining performance of the factors of production, namely equipment. This declining performance of production factors is the cause of the loss of productive time within a certain time. Economically, this would be counter-productive to efforts to meet the company's production targets. This problem will be analyzed by measuring the overall effectiveness of production factors or machines (OEE method), as an important part of a series of industrial production processes. From the calculation results, the level of effectiveness of the production system performance according to world-class benchmark standards has not yet reached the specified standard. In measuring effectiveness, the average performance is 67%. This figure can actually be increased, so that it shows the production performance as targeted by the corporation.


Keywords


Productivity; factors of production; loss time

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blanchard, S. Benjamin, (1997), An Enhanced Approach for ImplementingTotal Productive Maintenance In The Manucfacturing Environment, Journal Of Quality In Maintenance Engineering.

Borris, S. (2006). Total Productive Maintenance. Mcgraw-Hil.

R.C., (2001), Overall Equipment Effectivenes: Powerful Production/Maintenance Tool for Incrased Profits, First Edition, Industrial Press Inc., New York.

Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction To TPM (Total Productive Maintenance).

Mulyati, D., (2011). Analisis Efektivitas Peralatan Produksi Pada PT. Bahari

Wortmann, J.C. Wijgaard, J and Bertrand,J.W.M. (1999). Production Control, North- Holland.

Toomey, J.W. (1996). MRP II; Planning for Manufacturing Excellence, Chapman & Hall, New York.

Volmann, T.E. Berry, B.L, Whybark, D.C, and Jacobs, F.R. (2005). Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply chain Management, Fifth Edition. MCgRow-Hill.

Afshari et al. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem.

Cabala, Pawel. (2010). Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process In Evaluating Decision Alternatives. Operation Research and Decision. 1: 5.

Diah et al. 2018. Penerapan Metode AHP dan SAW Untuk Penentuan Kenaikan Jabatan Karyawan.

Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng. (2011). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Application.

Irfan Subakti. (2002). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (Decision Support System). ITS. Surabaya.

Irvan, Wahyu. (2020). Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Saw Dalam Pemilihan Lahan Kelapa Sawit.

Prisa et al. (2019). Analisis Metode AHP dan SAW Pada Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Ketua Departemen Himpunana Mahasiswa.

Iryanto. 2008). Eksposisi Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Riset Operasi.

Kevin et al. (2014). Perbandingan Metode AHP dan SAW Dalam Menentukan Calon Karyawan.

Kusumadewi, et al. (2006). Fuzzy Multi- Attribute Decision Making. Yogyakarta.Graha Ilmu. Hal 361.

Ni Wayan, et al. (2018). Implementasi Metode AHP dan SAW dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Prediksi Potensi Akademik Mahasiswa STMIK STI.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5672

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 44 times
PDF - 6 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.