Legal Certainty of Stopping the Prosecution of Criminal Cases By The Prosecutor's Office in a Restorative Justice Approach

Hamrin Hamrin, Kumba Digdowiseiso

Abstract


Restroative justice is in principle limited only to actors who have just committed crimes and are not recidivists, and only to certain types of minor crimes. The purpose of the research in this preparation is to analyze the termination of the prosecution of criminal problems by the prosecutor's office through a restorative justice approach and a form of legal certainty for the termination of criminal problems by the prosecutor's office through the Restorative Justice approach. This research uses a normative juridical approach. The type of legal material used is primary, secondary and tertiary legal material analysis used is using qualitative alalysis. Based on the results of research, it is proven that the prosecution of criminal problems can be tried with a restorative justice approach to criminal acts that are tried only to be threatened with a fine or threatened with imprisonment for no more than 5 years, criminal acts are tried with the value of fact objects or the value of losses caused by criminal acts of not more than IDR 2.5 million. The form of legal certainty with the existence of restroative justice is the involvement of victims and actors directly in solving criminal problems. The restorative justice approach in this regard prioritizes efforts to link the participation of victims and actors to share legal certainty for victims.


Keywords


criminal act; restorative justice; legal certainty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achjani Zulfa, E. (2009). Restorative Justice. FHUI Issuing Body.

Aini, S. et al. (2019). valuation of Authentic Assessment Implementation in Public Elementary School 101775 Sampali, Deli Serdang Regency Academic Year 2019/2020. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal. P.29-40

Atasasmita, R. (2020). Contemporary Criminal Justice System. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Azman, A. dan M. T. bin M. (2012). “Crime Victims Support System and Restorative Justice: Possible Implementation in Malaysia.” Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH) Malaysia: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Crime, U. N. O. on D. and. (2006). Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes 5. United Nation. http://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/06- 56290_Ebook

Hatta, M. (2016). Capita Selecta Of Criminal Law Reform And Sentencing System. Liberty.

Indonesian Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restroative Justice, (2020).

PAF, L. (1997). Basics of Indonesian Criminal Law. Image of Aditya Bakti.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2011). Legal Research Methods. Gold.

Prayitno, K. P. (2012). Restorative Justice for Justice in Indonesia (Philosophical Juridical Perspective in Law Enforcement In Concreto). Journal of Legal Dynamics, 12(3).

Ritzer, G. (2004). Sociology: The Science of Double Paradigma. PT. King Grafindo Persada.

Rm, S. (2004). Prosecution and Judicial Practice. Ray Grafika.

Shah, M. et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 276-286.

Strang, J. B. and H. (2001). Restorative Justice and Civil Society.

Sungguno, B. (2011). Legal Research Methodology. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6000

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 27 times
PDF - 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.