_.gif)
_.gif)
Progressive Legal Views on the Implementation of the Omnibus Law Method in Indonesia
Abstract
Indonesia is a constitutional state which was contain in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and based on the prevailing laws and regulations. The current laws and regulations are considered to have a lot of influence on legal positivism teachings, the law is considered rigid and causes the number of regulations that Indonesia has. The number of regulations is considered quite a cause for concern, and can lead to a decline in the quality of regulations in Indonesia. So, the Government tries a new method, namely the omnibus law method in simplifying regulations in Indonesia. The government's efforts to reduce regulatory obesity through the omnibus law method are considered formal flaws because they are not in accordance with the rules for the formation of laws and regulations stipulated in Law no. 12 of 2011. The progressive legal view of the omnibus law is necessary then to see the real and living substantial aspects of society and the consideration of social perspectives needs to be adjusted and the Government needs to continue to explore the real aspects in society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aedi, Ahmad Ulil dan Sakti Lazuardi dan Ditta Chandra Putri. (2020). “Arsitektur Penerapan Omnibus Law melalui Transplantasi Hukum Nasional Pembentukan Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol. 14, No. 1.
Al Arif, M. Yasin. (2019). “Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif”, Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 1.
Argama, Rizky. (2020). “Pelanggaran Prosedur dapat Membuat UU Cipta Kerja Batal”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5f87d14085a4c/pelanggaran- prosedur-dapat-membuat-uu-cipta-kerja-batal-oleh--rizky- argama?page=alldiakses pada 29/10.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2017). Perihal Undang-Undang. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. (2018). “Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, dan Relevansi”, Undang : Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Azar, Muhammad. (2019). “Omnibus Law Sebagai Solusi Hiper-Regulasi Menuju Sinkronisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia”, Jurnal Administrative Law & Governance, Vol. 2, No.1.
Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. (2020). “Kompabilitas Penggunaan Metode Omnibus Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 27, No.2
Dysmala, Emma, (2012), “Pemikiran Menuju Hukum Progresif”, Jurnal Wawasan Hukum Volume 27, Nomor 2.
Fauzia, Mutia. (2020). “Sri Mulyani Sebut Tujuan Omnibus Law Untuk Keluar dari Middle Income Trap ” https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/10/12/110107326/sri-mulyani- sebut-tujuan-omnibus-law-untuk-keluarkan-indonesia-dari- middle?page=all. diakses pada 05/11.
Febriansyah, Ferry Irawan. (2016). “Konsep Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang- Undangan di Indonesia” Jurnal Perspektif Vol XXI, No. 3
Fitryantica, Agnes. (2019). “Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia melalui Konsep Omnibus Law”, Jurnal Gema Keadilan Volume 6, Edisi III.
Goertz, Johanna M.M. (2011). “Omnibus or not: Package Bills and Single-Issue Bills in a Legislative Bargaining Game” Social Choice and Welfare Vol 36, Edisi 3-4.
Hazama, Yasushi dan Şeref Iba. (2016). “Legislative Agenda Setting By a Delegative Democracy: Omnibus Bills in The Turkish Parliamentary System”, Jurnal Routledge Turkish Studies
Hidayat, Rofiq dan Agus Sahbani. (2020). “Karut-Marut Penyusunan RUU Cipta Kerja”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5e78dd2d6bfd9/karut-marut- penyusunan-ruu-cipta-kerja?page=all diakses pada 29/10.
JDIH, https://jdihn.go.id/search/pusat diakses pada 14/10/2020.
Kurnia, Titon Slamet. (2016). “Hukum dan Keadilan: Isu Bagian Hulu dan Hilir”, Refleksi Hukum Volume 10, Nomor 1.
Kurniawan, Fajar. (2020). “Problematika Pembentukan RUU Cipta Kerja dengan Konsep Omnibus Law pada Klaster Ketenagakerjaan Pasal 89 angka 45 tentang Pemberian Pesangon kepada Pekerja yang di PHK”, Jurnal Panorama Hukum Volume 5, Nomor 1.
Kurtz, Glen S. (2001). ‘Tactical Maneuvering on Omnimbus Bills in Congress”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, No. 1.
Mayasari, Ima. (2020). “Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi Melalui Implementasi Omnimbus Law di Indonesia”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding Volume 9, Nomor 1.
Nalle, Victor Imanuel W, Retno Dewi Pulung Sari dan Martika Dini Syaputri .(2018).“Analisis Ex-Ante oleh Eksekutif terhadap Rancangan Undang- Undang: Menuju Legislasi Berkualitas melalui Pendekatan Teknokrasi”, Arena Hukum Volume 11, Nomor 1.
Nalle, Victor Imanuel W. (2017). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Yogyakarta: Suluh Media
Prabowo, Haris. (2021). “Menko Perekonomian Airlangga Klaim Omnibus Law sudah Libatkan Buruh”, https://tirto.id/menko-perekonomian-airlangga-klaim-omnibus-law-sudah-libatkan-buruh-eyvP diakses pada 7/01.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2006). Hukum dalam Jagat Ketertiban. Jakarta: UKI Press
Setiadi, Wicipto. (2020). “Simplikasi Regulasi dengan Menggunakan Metode Pendekatan Omnibus Law” Jurnal Rechtsvinding Vol. 9, No. 1.
Shah, M. et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 276-286.
Tidak Diketahui, “Omnibus Law: DPR Bentuk Tim Perumus Libatkan Buruh, Koalisi Sebut Terjadi ‘Pembelahan di Tubuh Serikat Pekerja’”, https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-53821967, diakses pada 7/01/2021.
United States Government Official Website, https://www.usa.gov/how-laws-are-made diakses pada 06/01/2021.
Yahya, Achmad Nasrudin. (2021). “Buruh Mundur dari Tim Teknis Omnibus Law RUU Cipta Kerja, Ada Apa?”, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/07/14/10075351/buruh-mundur-dari-tim-teknis-omnibus-law-ruu-cipta-kerja-ada-apa?page=all, diakses pada 7/01.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6114
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 37 timesPDF - 26 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.