Judges' Considerations in Assessing the Criteria for Class Action Lawsuits during the Covid 19 Pandemic Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2002 concerning Class Action Lawsuits (Study of Decision Number: 581/Pdt.G/2020/Pn/Mdn)

Sahala Pardamean Harahap, Risdalina Risdalina, Indra Kumalasari M

Abstract


This study aims to determine the judge's considerations in assessing the criteria for Class Action lawsuits in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2002 concerning Class Action Lawsuit Procedures. This research is descriptive normative legal research with a case approach. This study uses the types and sources of legal materials consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The Class Action lawsuit filed must be examined first and must meet the criteria for a class action lawsuit before the trial is held. The lawsuit in the Decision has met the three criteria for a Class Action lawsuit in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2002 concerning Class Action Lawsuit Procedures. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the lawsuit filed in the decision has met the criteria for a Class Action lawsuit, but there are differences in the fulfillment of the class action criteria in the decision, including the criteria for numeriousity, commonality and typicality, and adequacy of representation. The legal consequences if the lawsuit does not meet the criteria to be examined as a Class Action lawsuit, namely the lawsuit is declared invalid, the case examination is terminated, the lawsuit is declared unacceptable, and the losing party is punished to pay the court costs incurred.


Keywords


judge's consideration; class action lawsuit; class action lawsuit criteria

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aini, Latifah Nur, et al. (2012) Analisis Tentang Gugatan Class Action Yang Diperiksa Dengan Acara Perdata Biasa. Surakarta: Jurnal Portal Garuda

Arif, S. (2019). Influence of Leadership, Organizational Culture, Work Motivation, and Job Satisfaction of Performance Principles of Senior High School in Medan City. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 239-254

Badriyah Harun, (2008) Aryya Wyagrahtama, “Tata Cara Pengajuan Class Action”. (Yogjakarta : Pustaka Yustisia).

Bambang Sunggono, (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Perkasa, Jakarta.

E. Sundari, (2002) “pengajuan Gugatan Secara Class Action” (suatu studi Perbandingan dan Penerapannya di Indonesia, Jogjakarta : Univesitas Atma Jaya)”

Edy Ikhsan dan Mahmul Siregar, (2009) “metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum sebagai Bahan Ajar”, (Medan, Fakultas Hukum Universita Sumatera Utara).

Emerson Yuntho, (2005). Class Action sebagai Pengantar, Jakarta.Gramedia, Yogyakarta

Harahap, M Yahya. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan, Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Harjono. (2017). Materi Kuliah Class Action. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

https://referensi.elsam.or.id diakses pada tanggal 6 Mei 2022

Irianto, Sulistyowati.(2006). Mempersoalkan “Netralitas “ dan “Objektivitas” Hukum:Sebuah Pengalaman Perempuan dalam Perempuan dan Hukum:Menuju Hukum Yang Berprespektif Kesetaraan dan Keadilan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta

Itok Dwi Kurniawan Vol. 6 No. 2 – Desember (2020), Analisis Putusan Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok Sebagai Upaya Mendapatkan Mendapatkan Jaminan Perlindungan Hak Atas Tanah. Surakarta Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana;

M. Yahya Harahap, (2004) Hukum acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaa, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cet. 1(Jakarta : Sinar Grafika)

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta

Mas Achmad Santosa, (1997), Konsep dan Penerapan Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok (Class Action), ICEL, Jakarta.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno.(2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2002 tentang Perwakilan Kelompok;

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2005) “penelitian Hukum” (Jakarta : Prenda Media Group)

Restaria F. Hutabaratn, (2011) “Stigma 65 Strategi Mengajukan Gugatan Class Action” (Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia)

Retnowulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, (1992), Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Subekti, (2002), Hukum Perjanjian, Intermasa, Jakarta.

Sunggono, Bambang.(2007). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. (2007). Hukum Acara Perdata dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia.

Varia Peradilan,(2012). Gugatan Class Action yang Diperiksa dengan Acara Biasa. April No 317. Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Zainal Asikin, (2015). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6156

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 17 times
PDF - 16 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.