Corrective Feedback in the Digital Learning: The Use of Google Classroom
Abstract
Corrective feedback comes as a crucial aspect for majority of students in digital learning especially during this Covid-19 outbreak. As a reason, the students need to receive more information from their own teachers so as to achieve the learning outcomes regarding the material understanding. Based on the statement mentioned, it might be benefits and challenges perceived by the students towards the corrective feedback in the online learning process since the digital learning does not lead them to have learning satisfaction compared to the offline learning with comprehensive learning interaction of classroom activity. This research was aimed at investigating the benefits and challenges of corrective feedback perceived by the students in the digital learning through the use of Google Classroom. The phenomenology of qualitative study was employed in this study by using interview as the research instrument. Besides, this research was conducted at an Islamic private university in Yogyakarta concerning on Master of English Language Education. The study employed six Master’s degree students of English Language Education who had enrolled in some courses during the digital learning process. Thereupon, the data analysis of this research was conducted by transcribing the interview, applying coding called as open coding, analytical coding, axial coding and selective coding as well as explaining and elaborating research findings in the results and discussion supported by the appropriate theories from the experts. In addition, the researchers had found several findings related to benefits and challenges of corrective feedback perceived by the students in the digital learning. As the benefits of corrective feedback, those were developing writing skill, becoming a guideline for doing the assignments, understanding strengths and weaknesses of writing skill, becoming a habit to write an academic essay, and building grammar understanding in writing skill. Of the challenges in the corrective feedback, those were facing the difficulty to understand the general comments, receiving long duration feedback, providing unequal feedback distribution, giving a limited access for having communication with the lecturers, receiving unclear information towards the feedback content of the writing assignments, providing lack of essay writing examples, and receiving a limited feedback information.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akmal & Mahrup. (2019). Direct-unfocused-corrective feedback: A model for improving writing skills. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(11), 206–220.
Albashtawi, A. H., & Al Bataineh, K. B. (2020). The effectiveness of Google classroom among EFL students in Jordan: An innovative teaching and learning online platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(11), 78. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.12865
Allen, R. E., & Wiles, J. L. (2016). A rose by any other name: Participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 149-165.
Astia, M. (2018). Corrective feedback in English class. Center of Language and Culture Studies, 3(3), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.30957/ijotl-tl.v3i3.502.
Brick, B., & Holmes, J. (2008). Using screen capture software for student feedback: Towards a methodology, in: Ladis Celda, 339–342. Retrieved from https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/file/5baad20d-1c6f-3a98-b380-
Chen, W. (2018). The Effects of Corrective Feedback Strategies on English Majors’ Writing. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p55.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. London: Routledge.
Corder, S. (1974). Idiosyncratic Dialects and Error Analysis, in: J. Richard (Ed.), Error Analysis: Perspectives on second Language Acquisition. Essex: Longman, 158-171.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Dilâra, Ş., & Hakk, İ. (2017). Contribution of corrective feedback to English language learners’ writing skills development through work folio-based tasks. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(1), 1–30.
Ebele, U. F., & Olofu, P. A. (2017). Study habit and its impact on secondary school student’s academic performance in biology in the federal capital territory, Abuja. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(10), 583-588. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.3117
Ferdian, N. R. (2020). ESP students’ preferences in learning English: Face to face corrective feedback vs online corrective feedback. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 2(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v2i1.199
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
Guinness, K., Detrich, R., Keyworth, R. & States, J. (2020). Overview of Corrective Feedback. Oakland, CA: The Wing Institute. https://www.winginstitute.org/instructional-delivery-feedback
Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2014). Technology enhanced feedback on assessment. In The Australian Computers in Education Conference. Adelaide, SA, 228-238.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Interpersonal aspects of response: constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khanlarzadeh, M., & Taheri, P. (2017). Written corrective feedback in second language writing: Does SEMI- feedback suffice? European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 6(2), 2017, 329–342.
Luan, N. L., & Ishak, S. N. A. (2018). Instructor’s direct and indirect feedback: How do they impact learners’ written performance? 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(3), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-08.
Mulati, D. F., Nurkamto, J., & Drajati, N. A. (2020). The Teachers’ Beliefs in Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on the Students’ Writing. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i1.7644
Mulia, N. A. (2020). Indonesian EFL students’ engagement in online language learning platform. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 154-163. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/34159
Purba, N. et al. (2020). Language Acquisition of Children Age 4-5 Years Old in TK Dhinukum Zholtan Deli Serdang. Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature. P.19-24
Rezaei, S., Mozaffari, F., & Hatef, A. (2011). Corrective feedback in SLA: Classroom practice and future directions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n1p21.
Rezazadeh, S., Ashrafi, S., & Foozunfar, M. (2018). The Effects of oral, written feedback types on EFL learners' written accuracy: The relevance of learners' perceptions. CELS, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10968.60169/1
Shae, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis) alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
Suharyanti, E. M., & Fauziati, E. (2020). Written corrective feedback on EFL students at an Islamic junior high school. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 5(2), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.11207
Suryanto, B. T. (2018). Written grammar feedback on students’ writing with visual learning style. Pedagogical Journal, 5(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v5i1.215
Swanto, S., & Din, W. A. (2014). Employing drilling technique in teaching English writing skills to a group of rural Malaysian students. IISTE, 4(14). https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/DCS/article/view/14061
Widyaningsih, T. L. (2018). An Analysis of online corrective feedback implementation in writing class. BRIGHT: A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 2(1), 63-78.
Yoke, S. K., Rajendran, C. B., Sain, N., Kamaludin, P. N. H., Nawi, S. M., & Yusof, S. M. (2013). The use of online corrective feedback in academic writing by L1 Malay learners. English Language Teaching, 6(12), 175-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n12p175.
Yunus, W. M. (2020). Written corrective feedback in English compositions: Teachers’ practices and students’ expectations. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2255
Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student’s engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
Zohrabi, K., & Ehsani, F. (2014). The role of implicit & explicit corrective feedback in Persian-speaking EFL learners’ awareness of and accuracy in English grammar. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2018-2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.637.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6176
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 96 timesPDF - 18 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.