Optimal Portfolio Based Risk and Return of Corporate Sukuk in Indonesia

Wahyu Rosid, Idqan Fahmi, Rifki Ismal

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the optimal portfolio of corporate sukuk in Indonesia using the risk return analysis approach and the CML (Capital Market Line) model in order to foster investor interest in investing in corporate sukuk instruments. This research was conducted using data throughout 2014 – 2018 and is divided into three measurement periods, namely the crisis period (2014-2016), post-crisis (2016-2018) and long-term (2014-2018), each period representing Indonesia's economic condition. and globally. The results showed that during the crisis period, sukuk with ijarah were superior both in risk and return compared to mudharabah, so that the optimal portfolio composition was to maximize the composition of ijarah. However, in the post-crisis period (improvement of economic conditions) and long-term measurements, the composition of the existing portfolio is more varied depending on the goals of each investor, either to maximize returns or to minimize risk. However, in the post-crisis period (improvement of economic conditions) and long-term measurements, the composition of the existing portfolio is more varied depending on the goals of each investor, either to maximize returns or to minimize risk. The optimal portfolio combination (referring to the benchmark rate) between sukuk mudharabah and sukuk ijarah is 0% mudharabah: 100% ijarah for the period 2014 – 2016 with a return rate of 3.9 and a risk of 0.49, 81% mudharabah : 19% ijarah for the period 2016 – 2018 with a return rate of 2.71 and a risk of 0.65, and 85% mudharabah: 15% ijarah for the period 2014 – 2018 with a return rate of 2.77 and a risk of 0.79. This combination can form an efficient frontier that provides a comparison of the same level of return and risk.


Keywords


Optimal portfolio; risk-return; corporate sukuk

Full Text:

PDF

References


[IBPA] Indonesia Bond Pricing Agency. 2018. Review Ekonomi Dan Pasar Obligasi Tahun 2018. [internet]. [diakses pada: 2019 Mei 13] tersedia pada: https://www.phei.co.id/Portals/0/Berita%20PHEI/Tinjauan%20Pasar%20Surat%20Utang%20Indonesia%202021.pdf?ver=Kwnl44cFjYtgeLmSRuZ0pA%3D%3D

[IFSB] Islamic Financial Services Board. (2018). Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report. [internet]. [diakses pada: 2019 Juli 22] tersedia pada: https://www.ifsb.org/preess_full.php?id=485&submit=more

[OJK] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2018). Statistik Sukuk Korporasi Indonesia Maret 2018. Jakarta: OJK

Ascarya, Karim AA, & Anwar, E. (2013). Optimal Financing for Islamic Banking in Indonesia. Working Paper. 2-60.

Azifah N. (2015). Analisis risk dan return portofolio surat berharga syariah negara dan obligasi pemerintah periode 2010-2014 [tesis]. Jakarta (ID), Universitas Indonesia

Aziz, Musdalifah. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Investor Terhadap Return Saham Perusahaan Lq 45 Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Hasanudin.

Benninga, S. (2000). Financial Modelling 2nd ed. Massachussets(US), Mit Press.

Bodi, K & Marcus. (2014). Manajemen Portofolio dan Investasi. Jakarta(ID), Salemba Empat.

Burhanuddin. (2013). Analisis Perbandingan Obligasi Syariah Mudharabah dan Ijarah di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Fakultas Ekononomi. Universitas Hasanudin.

Devjak, S. (2004). Optimisation of the securities portfolio as a part of the risk management process. Journal of Management, 9(1):81-99.

Dewi, N. (2011). Mengurai masalah pengembangan sukuk korporasi di Indonesia menggunakan analytical networking process. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review. 6(2):138-16.

Eling, M, Schuhmacher F. 2006. Does the choice of performance measure influence the evaluation of hedge funds?Working Paper. 29(1): 1-20.

Elton, EJ, Gruber, MJ, Brown, S., & William, NG (2003). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. New Jersey(US), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Endri. (2009). Permasalahan pengembangan sukuk korporasi di Indonesia menggunakan metode Analytical Network Process (ANP). Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan Pebanas, 13(3):359-372.

Husnan, S. (2014). Dasar-dasar Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritas. Yogyakarta(ID), UPP AMP YKPN.

Ismal, R. (2014). An optimal risk-return portfolio of islamic banks. Humanomics, 30(4): 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-08-2013-0055

Jones, CP & Jensen, GR (1994). Investments: Analysis and Management. New York(US), John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Jones, CP (2014). Investments Principles and Concepts. New York(US), John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Khairani, AB (2015). Analisis perbandingan kinerja kelas aset syariah dan portofolio syariah optimal dengan kinerja kelas aset konvensional optimal [tesis]. Bogor (ID): STEI Tazkia.

Kidd, D. (2011). The Sharpe Ratio and the information ratio. Virginia(US), CFA Institute.

Malik, AD (2017). Analisa faktor faktor yang mempengaruhi minat masyarakat berinvestasi di pasar modal syariah melalui bursa galeri investasi UISI. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Binis Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia. 3(1).

Malik, M & Surya, BA. (2013). Optimal portfolio strategy of Indonesian government bond and foreign exchange using Markowitz efficient theory. Singapore (SG): Proceedings of 4th Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference.2013 September 31– Oktober 1; Singapura, Singapura. Singapura (SG) : World Business Institute, Australia and East Asia Institute of Management

Manurung, AH, & Tobing, WRL (2010). Obligasi (Harga portofolio dan Perdagangannya). Jakarta(ID), PT. Adler Manurung Press.

Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x

Razief, NFD & Mohammad, S. (2011). Risiko-risiko dalam kewangan semasa: penilaian daripada perspektif Islam, International Conference Management (ICM) Proceeding.

Render, B., Stair, RM, & Hanna, ME (2012). Quantitative Analysis for Management. New Jersey(US), Prentice Hall.

Sharpe, WF (1994). The sharpe ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1): 49–58.

Suqaier, Faten, S., & Hussein, AZ (2011). The Effect of Diversification on Achieving Optimal Portfolio. European Journal of Economics Finance and Administration Sciences No. 32.

Tandelilin, E. (2010). Portofolio dan Investasi Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta(ID), Kanisius.

Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk. The Review of Economic Studies, Ltd., 25(2), 65-86.

Triharyanto, RR (2013). Analisis portofolio optimal berdasarkan model indeks tunggal (Studi kasus: saham syariah di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) [tesis]. Yogyakarta (ID): UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Widoatmojo, S. (2005). Cara Sehat Investasi di Pasar Modal. Jakarta(ID), PT Jurnalindo Aksara Grafika.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6200

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 65 times
PDF - 35 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.